Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Locals Protest Outside Housing Exhibition.

Cameraboy | 17.04.2015 23:34 | Public sector cuts | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements | Cambridge | World

On Thursday April 16th 2015 many local people assembled outside Cambridge Corn Exchange in response to a property exhibition hosted there.

The Exhibition in question...
The Exhibition in question...

The 'rabble' outside!
The 'rabble' outside!

Unite(d) in their cause.
Unite(d) in their cause.

Artwork on Corn Exchange reminds us who the venue was ACTUALLY intended for.
Artwork on Corn Exchange reminds us who the venue was ACTUALLY intended for.

Is this all you can now afford in Cambridge?
Is this all you can now afford in Cambridge?

TentCam!®
TentCam!®

A Left Unity contingent were also there.
A Left Unity contingent were also there.

Spot the unintended ironic humour...
Spot the unintended ironic humour...

Placard art #1
Placard art #1

Placard art #2
Placard art #2

Placard art #3
Placard art #3

Placard art #4
Placard art #4


This might on the face of it seem incongruous until you learn that many of the new build properties in Cambridge are being snapped up by foreign investors... and left empty while the current London driven property bubble continues to hyper inflate prices.

This has led to a situation where, despite there being at least 2,500 people awaiting homes on local social housing lists, these same local people are being priced out of the market (either for renting or buying) by the artificially exaggerated prices we are currently witnessing, with Cambridge now being one of the most expensive places in the country outside of London to (attempt to) buy or rent a home.

This problem has been exacerbated by the post-Thatcherite Right To Buy scheme started in the 1980s, which has seen a significant depletion of Council housing stocks, which have not been replaced with enough new stock for a generation.

Meanwhile, as if to rub salt into the collective wound Thursday saw the whole Corn Exchange (a venue originally intended to be a meeting place for more humble working people other than millionaires and so-called nouveau riche) hired to host a property exhibition to encourage even more 'investment' of this nature in the city.

This exhibition was itself sponsored by the very same local newspaper that has recently reported stories like this:

 http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Fears-foreign-buyers-leave-hundreds-Cambridge/story-26278702-detail/story.html

Just really pile on the irony, there seemed to be far more protestors outside the building than potential punters actually going in, with the venue being virtually empty!

Those that did dare to show up and go in were promptly jeered at by the people assembled outside, including a rather large number of BMWs and 4x4s that hastily sailed past on Corn Exchange Street!

As for the protest itself, it was a good natured (and good humoured) affair with a decent cross-section people there to represent the actual residents of the city.

No police showed up, although there was a private security team at the entrance of The Corn Exchange, and I found myself (as a long term resident of Cambridge) in the bizarre situation of being effectively blocked from entering a venue I've previously been allowed into to attend other events.

The message I got from this (whether intended or not) was if you ain't got enough money you ain't welcome inside today.


Need I say more..?


*************************************************************************************************


HOUSING CRISIS IN CAMBRIDGE
PUBLIC MEETING
Tuesday April 28th, 7:30pm
Ross Street Community Centre.

Cameraboy

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

Resistance is required whoever wins the election

19.04.2015 13:38

Congratulations to the housing protestors and for the encouraging reporting of the opposition to another housing swindle.

Regan


Bring back Council Housing to the East End, bring back democratic Councils too

20.04.2015 09:12

Have any of your readers seen a 4 part series shown on C4 called ‘How top get a Council House’?
It was on air in April 2014.
If you haven’t you can still see it online.
Take a look.
The programme is proof that they have scrapped Tower Hamlets council.
Known s the country’s most reprieved bright, the programme was a neo liberal plant arguing for social; cleansing on the ground that people were poor!
None has objected to that line.
Not even Tower Hamlets councillors.
Not Mr Galloway.
Not Mr Ken Livingstone.
Not anyone from the Labour arty, the Tory party or no party.
Mr Kenneth Livingstone and Mr G Galloway are known backers of the Council, claiming that it is a democratic Council.
If so, how is it that the same Council is silent when Tor

DefendCouncilHousingDefendDemocracyforCouncils


Missing something

22.04.2015 04:00

Your argument fails to deal with the issue of associated social movement as it links to low cost housing that has shown demand for low cost social housing always exceeds supply because poor people are drawn to areas of both upward social mobility and restricted rent control reversal paradigms. Society of whatever form will never deal with the demand for any housing at any ACG or U level because there is by nature a shortage at all points of the build/supply/ renewal curve.

Went to Uni in Cambridge


Good points, there is an answer

22.04.2015 09:18

Our Camb, student above makes a couple of important points but misses the key one. The problem with housing in this country is that the stock is dictated by who can pay the most not whose need is the most. The nationalisation of all housing would allow the redistribution of housing based on the needs and requirements of the population. If housing is owned by all, maintained by all and used by all we no longer have the regional variations, landlords can't make profit from renting and everyone gets the house they need, where they need it.

There is simply no need for people to own the house they live in.

Problem solver


Fully agree, great report, good comments.

22.04.2015 11:51

At last some good sense and ideas being written here !

The theory of the public ownership of all housing is one that is gaining in credibility and support all through Europe, I recently spoke in Greece at the University of Athens on this very subject and we had an interactive session after where students talked through ideas and concepts.

We thought the following would be a good start.

1) All housing of all types becomes the property of the State but only where the State is the true representative of the people and controlled by the people's oversight commitee

2) Housing will be allocated on the basis of need and work, social and educational requirements. Students to be given priority for housing near places of education including quiet spaces for reflection and study.

3) No compensation will be paid for housing taken by the people for the people

4) All future private ownership of property banned

5) All future private building of property banned

6) Exceptions to the above only made in the case of extreme political requirements related to Party activity.

This we felt was a good start for further discussion and thought.

Clive Allenby


A couple of questions for you Clive to make things clear to me

23.04.2015 09:37

1) All housing of all types becomes the property of the State but only where the State is the true representative of the people and controlled by the people's oversight commitee
@ Who gets to decide who sits on the "oversight commitee"

2) Housing will be allocated on the basis of need and work, social and educational requirements. Students to be given priority for housing near places of education including quiet spaces for reflection and study.
@ Who decides need ?

3) No compensation will be paid for housing taken by the people for the people
@ What will you do when almost the entire country objects to this ?

4) All future private ownership of property banned
@ How will this be enforced

5) All future private building of property banned
@ See point 4

6) Exceptions to the above only made in the case of extreme political requirements related to Party activity.
@ Interesting - a few examples please of these "political requirements related to Party activity" - shades of Animal Farm methinks !

Take your time Clive, it's not like these ideas have a snowball's chance in Hell of being adopted by anybody in the near future but I guess you knew that already.

Interested bystander


Some additional concerns with Clive's "final solution"

28.04.2015 17:14

1) All housing of all types becomes the property of the State but only where the State is the true representative of the people and controlled by the people's oversight commitee

==> What if someone refuses to handover their house? Will bailiffs and the police be sent around to force them to leave and handover ownership? I imagine a lot of people will have A LOT to lose and will not go down without a fight. You will probably need an armed army to enforce this rule.


2) Housing will be allocated on the basis of need and work, social and educational requirements. Students to be given priority for housing near places of education including quiet spaces for reflection and study.

Does this mean that a single person in a big house will be asked to leave so that a family can move in? If so, what if the person refuses to leave. Will the police be sent around to forcefully evict this person?


3) No compensation will be paid for housing taken by the people for the people
What if people refuse and start riots? People will have a lot to lose. You will need to hire extra police officers to enforce order. Also, have to asked other people if they are happy with this?

4) All future private ownership of property banned
Who will enforce this? People have owned houses for thousands of years. What if people disagree and refuse to follow these rules?


5) All future private building of property banned
What if someone wants to build a house for their family? Who put you in a charge?


6) Exceptions to the above only made in the case of extreme political requirements related to Party activity.
That sounds elitist. One rules for them, another rule for us?

Good luck with your "final solution". My suggestion would be to get a lot of funding and then hire some mercenaries who will go around with big sticks and beat anyone who disagrees with you.

Dave


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech