Acts of rebellion like shoplifting can make our lives better. Many of us would even struggle to get by without them [4]. But there is still plenty of room for improvement. The more we stand up to the rich, the better organised we are, and the more we have each others’ backs – the better things will be. If you look at shoplifting as something political then all of this is common sense. It doesn’t always feel like it, because television, newspapers, and preachers all constantly tell us that things like shoplifting are ‘crimes’ that we should feel ashamed of. If we are in debt or out of work then these people tell us that it is our fault. Many of us feel ashamed to tell anyone else that money is tight, or that we have a criminal record. However, the “morality” of most news reporters and religious preachers is obviously wrong if we look at the facts. Everything that the rich have was originally taken by force in wars and “colonisation” – in other words it was “stolen”. There are nowhere near enough jobs for everyone to be able to have one [5]. And countless people are short of money or in debt – because the rich have fucked up the economy! So there is no reason to feel shame for having problems like unemployment or debt – the rich created them, not us. There is also no reason we shouldn’t give them a taste of their own medicine – taking more of “their” things by force and standing up to them. So lets ignore them when they call us “apathetic” or “criminal” – if we hold our heads up high, rebel more, and get better organised then there is no limit to what we could do.
Shoplifting happens at the places where we’re meant to spend money, but small rebellions happen at the places we get money too – in jobcenters and at work. Strikes happen sometimes, but there is also a low-level class war being waged. Plenty of people slack off, steal from work [6], or call in sick every day. So long as it doesn’t hurt other workers too much, why not? The profits of our bosses are stolen wages – they get them by selling things made with our hard work, so there’s nothing wrong with trying to get a bit back. But some people go further by conspiring with other workers. Here’s a small example that comes to mind: one mate of mine works in a restaurant. Once when a posh customer was being a dickhead, the waitress she was on shift with added money to the customer’s bill and shared it with her. Another friend has a story about a factory where she used to work. Everyone there would take it in turns to sleep on shift, while the rest kept an eye out for the boss so no-one got caught. These are all small examples – but they show the kinds of things that we get away with without much effort, on a daily basis [7]. When “Left Wing” academics tell us that we need to “get organised”, they normally mean joining a trade union. The fact is we already do “organise” – we just don’t want to be part of their bureaucracies and power games. But imagine what it would be like if we formed real unions along the lines of the rebellions I’ve been talking about. If every time a benefits claimant got sanctioned, a hundred-strong mob turned up outside the job centre? Or if every time we wanted something more from our bosses (more wages, more holiday), we just made their business unworkable till we got it? This is something we could achieve!
On the other side of all this, the rich will not stop fighting until they have everything – total control of our lives and total ownership of everything we make and use. Governments repeal as many of our rights and benefits as they can get away with. Bosses cut our wages and increase our workload the second we give them the chance. Shop owners and landlords charge us as much as possible for the things we need. Even if things are bearable now, if we all settled down and stopped fighting then things would get worse very fast. So when any of us do manage to “make it” and get some reasonable level of income, or stable housing – the fight is not over and that is no excuse to abandon everyone else. One of the big barriers we face is just this – people who are in a similar situation as us, but who still try to stop us rebelling. Too many people have the attitude that “if I can’t get away with it then no-one else should either”, and will even help arrest shoplifters and grass on benefits “thieves”. The worst offenders call themselves the “lower middle class”, and try to adopt the culture of middle class people while looking down on the rest of us. The “upper middle class” laughs at these deluded people, but they are a serious problem for us [8]. If we’re going to challenge them then we need to create more feeling of solidarity in our communities, and to stand up for each other. We need to build what academics call a “culture of resistance” in our neighbourhoods and workplaces – where grasses and scabs feel ashamed to walk down the street, not the people who fight back and stick together.
So to sum up, all our lives would be better if we took our every day rebellions further – doing more, involving more people, being better organised [9]. To make this possible we need to create a “culture of resistance”, where people have each other’s backs and don’t feel ashamed to admit to things like shoplifting or being in debt. If we keep at it with all the passion and dedication that we can – maybe one day we can even get rid of the rich forever. We’re already part way there, we just need to go further and act with more confidence. Let’s make it happen!
[1] http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-23346533
[2] http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2001/341/regulation/23/made
[3] For example, according to one survey, more than ten percent of people in the UK admit to shoplifting. At least one third of people have stolen from work, and the same number have downloaded pirated music. Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1211629/How-80-think-OK-steal-work-study-reveals-wavering-moral-compass.html
[4] http://www.theweek.co.uk/uk-news/uk-austerity/50665/mothers-steal-feed-children-poor-rely-food-banks
[5] http://www.theguardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/feb/06/unemployment-vacancies-ratio
[6] http://www.submedia.tv/steal-something-from-work-day
[7] While we’re on that – one survey showed that about 43% of people in the UK admit to having pulled a sickie at least once. Source: http://www.tlnt.com/2011/09/01/survey-workers-everywhere-call-in-sick-when-they-arent-sick-at-all/
[8] For example, about a quarter of the people who get caught stealing from work are found out because someone snitched on them. Source: http://www.statisticbrain.com/employee-theft-statistics/
[9] As an example – look at the 200 people in Spain who looted a supermarket in broad daylight: http://elpais.com/elpais/2013/08/30/inenglish/1377875386_327683.html ; or the “robin hoods” in Greece: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/greece/2686331/Greek-Robin-Hoods-rob-supermarket-for-food.html . For your own safety, I suggest you read the article on black bloc tactics before taking part in any redistribution of food – https://theviolentminority.wordpress.com/2013/12/05/black-bloc-tactics-a-quick-guide/
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
we are the mass, but we are not a movement
08.02.2015 19:18
I guess, like many others, activists etc, can see that Anarchism and its offshoots cannot do much. this does not mean that these activists are not sincere, but their struggle is fruitless, as there is no movement.
for a movement, we do need leadership, which you are attempting to provide, but the anarchist ideology cannot really provide one.
i think the growth of anarchism after the collapse of the soviet union was understandable, but enough time has passed to see the deep problems of anarchism.
Anarchism is not up to the job. in the absence of anything other leadership, then it is obvious that the Labour party or Greens, Scottish Nationalists etc will benefit.
Lenin
Re: Lenin
09.02.2015 13:01
TVM
reply to why
09.02.2015 15:56
the things outlined above, 'shoplifting' etc are all very well, but you cannot seriously think capitalism is seriously damaged by shoplifting.
the anarchist desire for a better world is right, but from all the movements that i've been involved with, ie occupy most recently, it is pretty obvious that the anarchist ideology of no leadership, no political demands, etc does not lead to anything. it is not even clear what they want. i can't see how any kinrd of movement with no real demands can attract others, non activists, to itself.
if you want a movement, then say what you want, and form a programme to achieve it. that way, you will be the leadership of this.
it seems to me that only with a serious programme and leadership can there be any kind of change at all. without that, there are nothing but carnivals, etc. which when the dust settles, has accomplished nothing at all.
i have become extremely disillusioned with anarchism, and what it is capable of achieving.
this does not mean i am swp. i;m not. but i cannot see anarchism achieving much more than what it has already achieved, ie not much.
Lenin
Re: reply to why
09.02.2015 21:18
I never said it was
> it is pretty obvious that the anarchist ideology of no leadership, no political
> demands, etc does not lead to anything
Not to me. Maybe you could explain why?
> it is not even clear what they want
Have you ever read the aims and principles of any anarchist organisation? I'd say what they want is pretty clear. Try:
http://www.solfed.org.uk/
http://www.afed.org.uk/
If you're more academic, you could try reading some Kropotkin, or Albert Meltzer, or Alexander Berkman, or Malatesta, or Emma Goldman. They're all a bit different, but what they want is made pretty clear. From the way you talk, I reckon you'd get "an anarchist programme" by malatesta:
http://www.libcom.org/library/an-anarchist-programme-malatesta
> it seems to me that only with a serious programme and leadership can there
> be any kind of change at all
Yeah, "seems". But can you back that up?
> i cannot see anarchism achieving much more than what it has already achieved
I've seen anarchist tactics win plenty of small battles (but that's not what the article was about - my point was about everyday resistance). That SolFed site lists some of them.
TVM
reply to why
09.02.2015 23:16
Afed and Solfed strike me as the anarchist equivalents of the sparts and workers power. they are spent forces, with no doubt sincere well meaning people.
kropotkin et al are worth reading and have important things to say, but im not sure what they have to say is much applicable to 21st century britain. maybe i'm wrong tho.
i dont see the demands made by anarchist groups as at all realistic. some small victories, i wont deny, but nothing really substantial. the 'shoplifting' example is typical, it seems all very rebellious, but in reality doesn't amount to much.
good luck tho.
Lenin
Re: reply to why
10.02.2015 00:39
With shoplifting - well that's one thing that makes a difference in people's lives right now. For the people involved it really is substantial.
TVM
reply
11.02.2015 13:31
but malatesta etc thought of higher things than shoplifting.
what i'm saying, in a perhaps confused way, is that there is a need for something, but i cant see it coming from the same tired anarchist slogans and ideas so far. i cant see anarchism achieving more than what it has done
ie shoplifting, petty symbolic actions, while pretending to ourselves this is some great threat to the state
good luck tho, i think you are honest. cant ask for more than that.
Lenin