Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

BBC says sorry over lax Data Protection for sources - another own goal!

Unbanked | 01.04.2014 16:29 | Indymedia | Other Press | Social Struggles | London | World

The BBC itself has admitted during today (Tuesday 01 April 2014) to being sorry over the disclosure in the last 48 hours that the BBC'sd own lax management had allowed sources' data to be disclsoed to the supposed subject of last night's Panaroma episide abouut London's Tower Hamlets Borough Council.

The BBC itself has admitted during today (Tuesday 01 April 2014) to being sorry over the disclosure in the last 48 hours that the BBC'sd own lax management had allowed sources' data to be disclsoed to the supposed subject of last night's Panaroma episide abouut London's Tower Hamlets Borough Council.

This is the latest episode in the saga of the Panaroma programme being in the news about its role over sources and 'participants'.
The previous one of course involved the LSE students' alleged absue by the
Panarima programme over its North Korea "investigation".

So what about any substance in the hype that so many familiar couriers of the PR about Tower Hamlets Hamelts Borough Council have been indulging in?

The only thing that will be remembered for any length of time is the claim that the
incumbent "executive mayor" in Toweer Hamlets Council had allowed several £Millions worth of funding from the Council's "reserves" to recruit electoral support by favouring "Bengali and Somalina" groups, some "charities" based in Tower Hamlets.

The rest of the routines carried in the Panaroma episode are not new, as they had been already publicised by a number of the PR people doing the marketing of the
Panaroma episode.

Those did their bids via identufiable blogs and a small number of Fleet Street-linked outlets.

Posing against those is the Guardian and most noticeably their London blogger Dave Hill.

If the Guardian were ever investigated for bias, nepotism or alleged corruption then Dave Hill would certainkly feature in the list of the first five.

Hill is a lazy apologist for Council abse and misuse.

So what was the point of this Panorama?

If supporters of demicray and accoyuntabuility weere expecting any susbvnace to use in thweir claims then they weere dispaoouinmted.

It may be that in the near futire, more revelatons will conmdfirm as to how much public miney Tower Hamklets Council applied to stop the investigfayion.

One source that the BBC is irked about is of coyurse the woman decsriobed as being 24 and from a place ouitrsdie of London and as a "Bengali" who worked very brifely in the production team before turning into a useful supporter of the Tower Hamlets Council regime.

She was able to hand over a heavy duty set of materials to the Council.

Those materials contained sensitive details on the alleged absue as well as about the sources, quite a few insdie the Council itself.

Given that PRIVATE EYE had publsihed clear evidence of the tussle that had been going on over the udner-production Panorama, how was it that the BBC did not own uip to the heavy duty breavh until after tarnsmission last night?

That question is only the first on a very long list.

Unbanked

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Typing

02.04.2014 03:20

BBC says sorry over lax Data Protection for sources - another own goal!
Unbanked | 01.04.2014 16:29 | Indymedia | Other Press | Social Struggles | London | World
The BBC itself has admitted during today (Tuesday 01 April 2014) to being sorry over the disclosure in the last 48 hours that the BBC'sd own lax management had allowed sources' data to be disclosed to the supposed subject of last night's Panorama episode about London's Tower Hamlets Borough Council.

The BBC itself has admitted during today (Tuesday 01 April 2014) to being sorry over the disclosure in the last 48 hours that the BBC'sd own lax management had allowed sources' data to be disclosed to the supposed subject of last night's Panorama episode about London's Tower Hamlets Borough Council.

This is the latest episode in the saga of the Panorama programme being in the news about its role over sources and 'participants'.
The previous one of course involved the LSE students' alleged abuse by the
Panorama programme over its North Korea "investigation".

So what about any substance in the hype that so many familiar couriers of the PR about Tower Hamlets Hamlets Borough Council have been indulging in?

The only thing that will be remembered for any length of time is the claim that the
incumbent "executive mayor" in Tower Hamlets Council had allowed several £Millions worth of funding from the Council's "reserves" to recruit electoral support by favouring "Bengali and Somalian" groups, some "charities" based in Tower Hamlets.

The rest of the routines carried in the Panorama episode are not new, as they had been already publicised by a number of the PR people doing the marketing of the
Panaroma episode.

Those did their bids via identifiable blogs and a small number of Fleet Street-linked outlets.

Posing against those is the Guardian and most noticeably their London blogger Dave Hill.

If the Guardian were ever investigated for bias, nepotism or alleged corruption then Dave Hill would certainly feature in the list of the first five.

Hill is a lazy apologist for Council abuse and misuse.

So what was the point of this Panorama?

If supporters of democracy and accountability were expecting any substance to use in their claims then they were disappointed.

It may be that in the near future, more revelations will confirm as to how much public money Tower Hamlets Council applied to stop the investigation.

One source that the BBC is irked about is of course the woman described as being 24 and from a place outside of London and as a "Bengali" who worked very briefly in the production team before turning into a useful supporter of the Tower Hamlets Council regime.

She was able to hand over a heavy duty set of materials to the Council.

Those materials contained sensitive details on the alleged abuse as well as about the sources, quite a few inside the Council itself.

Given that PRIVATE EYE had published clear evidence of the tussle that had been going on over the underproduction Panorama, how was it that the BBC did not own up to the heavy duty breach until after transmission last night?

That question is only the first on a very long list.

Unbanked

reader


Daily Telegraph's Andrew Gilligan appears to have been served legal notice

03.04.2014 21:22


The Gilligan piece promised a lot this miring.

But after only 4 comments, visitors have been unable to post any comments.

Is that to do with Tower Hamlets Council sending Gilligan a legal action notice?

 http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100266083/lutfur-rahmans-muslim-favouritism-the-evidence/#disqus_thread

Londonresident


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech