Martin Summers: William Hague Is "Going To Nuremberg" If He Attacks Syria

Former French Foreign Minister: The War against Syria was Planned Two years before “The Arab Spring”
By Gearóid Ó Colmáin - Global Research, June 15, 2013
In an interview with the French TV station LCP, former French minister for Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas said:
‘’I’m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.
This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.
Naturally, I refused, I said I’m French, that doesn’t interest me.’’
Dumas went on give the audience a quick lesson on the real reason for the war that has now claimed the lives of tens of thousands of people.
‘’This operation goes way back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned… in the region it is important to know that this Syrian regime has a very anti-Israeli stance.
Consequently, everything that moves in the region- and I have this from the former Israeli prime minister who told me ‘we’ll try to get on with our neighbours but those who don’t agree with us will be destroyed.
It’s a type of politics, a view of history, why not after all. But one should know about it.’’
Dumas is a retired French foreign minister who is obliged to use discretion when revealing secrets which could affect French foreign policy. That is why he made the statement ‘I am French, that doesn't interest me’. He could not reveal France’s role in the British plan as he would be exposing himself to prosecution for revealing state secrets.
There have been many disinformation agents in the British and French press, many of them well known ‘leftist’ war correspondents and commentators, who have tried to pretend that Israel secretly supports Assad. Those who make such arguments are either stupid, ignorant or deliberate disinformation agents of NATO and Israel.
Israel’s support for Al Qaeda militants in Syria has even been admitted by the mainstream press. For example, Germany’s Die Welt newspaper published a report on June 12th on Israel’s medical treatment of the Al Qaeda fighters.
Israel planned this war of annihilation years ago in accordance with the Yinon Plan, which advocates balkanization of all states that pose a threat to Israel. The Zionist entity is using Britain and France to goad the reluctant Obama administration into sending more American troops to their death in Syria on behalf of Tel Aviv....
 http://www.globalresearch.ca/former-french-foreign-minister-the-war-against-syria-was-planned-two-years-before-the-arab-spring/5339112

"William Hague Is "Going To Nuremberg" If He Attacks Syria"

No he's not. British politicians do not go to the Hague, no more than US politicains go to the Hague. Tony Blair and George Bush didn't go to the Hague. Only African niggers and Asiatic wops go to the Hague. This is because, as we all know, white westerners are superior ethnic stock to all other human breeds and that superiority extends to never being able to do anything wrong. If there is a suspicion that something has been done by the white westerner, then you must leave it to God to decide.

I would say at this point that you should know that, but you are white middle class and you have been conditioned not to know these things. This has been done for your own good.

What will decide Syria's future, is which political fiction has got the longest legs.

Willaim Hague is just a suited and booted modern day witch playing the numbers game.

The numbers, like the bones of a bat in a witches cup, never lie.

I would just like to say at this point that I am a supporter of the rebels.

Bashar al-Assad is seen as a western stooge in Syria and thereabouts and that is why the rebels are attacking him. The British and Americans are trying to convince everybody that they support the rebels but no self-respecting rebel would accept that. The media in the UK and US are full to brimming with stories about the "relationship" between the rebels and the US UK govs. They have even engineered a western backed pisspot of Syrian dissidents in London and the US all trying to pretend that they are the legitimate government of Syria. No rebel in Syria wants anything to do with the westerners and there hand puppets.

The US and UK want only one thing...a known quantity in power in Syria. That known quantity is what allows them to keep the Israeli occultists alive and well.

William Hague is simply playing you all for mugs. He is deliberately trying to present HM Gov as wreckless and Republican-like as a means to steer you into a sedentary position. Hague knows that whatever he supports - you are bound to oppose. So he supports the rebels, and that inevitably means that you will support Assad, the secret object of the US and UK governments affections.

Do you think that a bombing campaign in Syria will not entail quietly bombing the rebels to death at the same time as very noisily bombing Assad into submission? The media know how this will go, any action in Syria means that they have to step up to the plate and wage an information war of their own. The will over-report the damage done to the Syrian government, while under-reporting the damage done to the rebels.

By this weaved deceit, will Syria fall into the hands of the Americans who will hand it over to Israel. When this has been completed, the Americans will simply move onto their next target, Iran.

None of you will oppose this.

All you will ever be able to say, is that you bleated throughout.

You are not free. You will never be free.

"Others, in an attempt to absolve themselves from the unearned guilt they harbor living in a nation of prosperity and wealth, try to buy morality on the cheap by pronouncing themselves for the 'good'. To them, the derivation of the 'good' is based on a simple, yet peculiar standard: the powerful and competent are wicked, while the feeble and impotent are innocent - regardless of the context. That is why they defend Iraq instead of America, and the Palestinian "resistance" instead of Israel."

What a demented lunacy that is.

You say the "powerful and competent" versus the "feeble and impotent". But it is exactly the other way around. The might that you so lovingly adore is itself an example of what is weak and impotent. It takes a coward to hold a gun to womens head. It takes a coward to claim that all disagreements can be settled by force. It takes a coward to claim that not resorting to violence is a sign of weakness. It takes a coward to copy the situation the weak find themseles in, just to use it for his own violent ends.

When you are old, in a wheerlchair or living in weakened state...I shall come calling for you and I shall hold a gun to your temple. I shall do this to make a statement. That statement shall be that I am strong, you are weak, and that the contest between us will be settled by force.

I will not concern myself with the injustice of it, because I am strong enough not to have to answer for myself.

That is what you are really saying.

All you know, is that violence wins over the weak. That is all you know.

That is outright yellow-bellied cowardice.

Go back to your website and print your name where we can all see it.

If you are strong enough, you will be able to do that without thinking!