Norway's immigration figures show that for the public 'immigration' means black or Eastern European and migrants from Western countries are not migrants. Immigration is not about nationalism.
You truth tellers have having problems with plain speaking. As a UK black, I’ll do it for you. Norwegians DO NOT CARE about immigration. They DO NOT CARE ABOUT multiculturalism. There has been no failure in multiculturalism in Norway, unless we are talking about racial discrimination.
Norwegians DO CARE about black immigration. Let’s be clear: white immigration is OK. Middle Eastern, African or Asian immigration is destroying the country. Right.
Let’s look at figures. I point to ‘Immigration to Norway’, countries of origin, 2011,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Norway
Let’s add up available figures for immigration from African/Asian and white countries.
Middle East, Asian, Africa - 250,680
White countries (including S America)- 296,684
The countries with the largest number of migrants are Poland, 60,610 and the second largest is Sweden, 34,108. Pakistan is the third, with 31,884.
The number of immigrants in Norway and children of two immigrant parents was in 2010 approximately 552,000 combined, which corresponded to 11.4% of the total population (2010). Over half, of course, were white countries.
It is convenient to be misleading in public discourse in the UK. When immigration is talked of people think about people who are racially different and East Europeans. So, white Brits will start complaining about immigration to migrants from the US. Indeed, In 2008, of the top ten migrant countries to the UK, the top five were: returning Brits, US, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada.
Why is it that people who complain that they are not allowed to tell the truth about immigration have a problem in admitting they are just concerned about black people?
Norwegians DO CARE about black immigration. Let’s be clear: white immigration is OK. Middle Eastern, African or Asian immigration is destroying the country. Right.
Let’s look at figures. I point to ‘Immigration to Norway’, countries of origin, 2011,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Norway Let’s add up available figures for immigration from African/Asian and white countries.
Middle East, Asian, Africa - 250,680
White countries (including S America)- 296,684
The countries with the largest number of migrants are Poland, 60,610 and the second largest is Sweden, 34,108. Pakistan is the third, with 31,884.
The number of immigrants in Norway and children of two immigrant parents was in 2010 approximately 552,000 combined, which corresponded to 11.4% of the total population (2010). Over half, of course, were white countries.
It is convenient to be misleading in public discourse in the UK. When immigration is talked of people think about people who are racially different and East Europeans. So, white Brits will start complaining about immigration to migrants from the US. Indeed, In 2008, of the top ten migrant countries to the UK, the top five were: returning Brits, US, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada.
Why is it that people who complain that they are not allowed to tell the truth about immigration have a problem in admitting they are just concerned about black people?
e-mail:
Homepage:
Comments
Hide the following comment
There are issues with the Poles too- who are white.
02.08.2011 14:06
There is also an issue with value systems, Asian and African immigrants bring their values such as exploitation within the family and the subservience of women and children to the wishes of the men in the community- Islam enshrines this domination in sharia Law- good reasons to oppose this movement?
anon