However, this did not restrain Obama or his New Zealand guest from issuing wild insinuations about Islamic terrorism. Obama is reported to have been briefed by intelligence officials before he spoke on the matter. Which makes his response an all the more odious bit of politicking to turn a horrific, tragic event into a propaganda stunt to stir up anti-Islamic fears and shore up Washington’s illegal “wars on terror”.
What should be disturbing is the level of inculcation of such irrational propaganda. It seems that every and any horror no matter how obviously unrelated to Islamic countries can now immediately be attributed by Obama and other Western leaders to “Islamic terrorists”.
It is as astounding act of reality inversion. The US leader who has taken international wars of aggression to record heights of lawlessness and who has made such a big deal of “embracing the Muslim world” nevertheless shows a disgraceful ability to prolong these wars by twisting any tragedy into a snide vilification of Islam.
by Finian Cunningham, Global Research, 23 July 2011
Within hours of Norway’s deadly bomb and gun attacks claiming at least 91 victims it has become clear that the horror was perpetrated by a Norwegian loner with rightwing Christian fundamentalist affiliations.
Yet President Barack Obama reacted immediately to the news of the atrocity to insinuate an Islamic connection and to justify America’s war on terror.
Obama spoke on Friday while hosting New Zealand Prime Minister John Key in the White House.
The US President said of the attacks: “It's a reminder that the entire international community has a stake in preventing this kind of terror from occurring, and that we have to work co-operatively together both on intelligence and in terms of prevention of these kinds of horrible attacks.”
Prime Minister Key added: “If it is an act of global terrorism I think it shows that no country, large or small, is immune from that risk, and that is why New Zealand plays its part in Afghanistan as we try and join others like the United States in making the world a safer place,” he said.
On Friday evening local time, 32-year-old Anders Behring Breivik was captured by police moments after he went on a two-hour shooting rampage at a youth summer camp, killing at least 84 people, most of whom were aged between 14 and 18.
Hundreds of teenagers had gathered on the island of Otoeya, about 20 miles northwest of the capital, Oslo, for an annual summer camp organised by the Scandinavian country’s ruling Labour party.
Six-foot blond-haired Breivik was heavily armed and dressed as a policeman when he arrived on the island and beckoned the youths to assemble near him. About two hours earlier, a massive car bomb had exploded in the downtown area of Oslo ripping through government buildings and killing at least seven.
The youths on the island of Otoeya thought that Breivik was carrying out a security check in connection with the bombing in the capital. He proceeded to open fire on the campers and ran amok for nearly two hours before being arrested. There were scenes of pandemonium as the gunman chased after victims through wooded areas on the tiny resort island. Some youths dived into the water in a bid to swim back to the mainland, with Breivik shooting at those trying to escape.
The gunman is believed to have also carried out the bombing. Days before the massacre, Breivik reportedly posted a message on the internet saying: “One person with belief can achieve more than one hundred thousand without belief.”
The Norwegian is also reportedly associated with extremist rightwing groups in Northern Europe. A Christian fundamentalist, Breivik is believed to have shared rabid “Islamophobic views”.
He is said to have been living with his mother in a wealthy district of Oslo and to have run a farming business. This is how he obtained the fertilizer materials believed to have been used in making the car bomb.
The profile of Breivik that emerged minutes after the incidents was clearly that of a Norwegian citizen who acted on a deranged loner mission.
However, this did not restrain Obama or his New Zealand guest from issuing wild insinuations about Islamic terrorism. Obama is reported to have been briefed by intelligence officials before he spoke on the matter. Which makes his response an all the more odious bit of politicking to turn a horrific, tragic event into a propaganda stunt to stir up anti-Islamic fears and shore up Washington’s illegal “wars on terror”.
What should be disturbing is the level of inculcation of such irrational propaganda. It seems that every and any horror no matter how obviously unrelated to Islamic countries can now immediately be attributed by Obama and other Western leaders to “Islamic terrorists”.
It is as astounding act of reality inversion. The US leader who has taken international wars of aggression to record heights of lawlessness and who has made such a big deal of “embracing the Muslim world” nevertheless shows a disgraceful ability to prolong these wars by twisting any tragedy into a snide vilification of Islam.
* Finian Cunningham is a Global Research Correspondent based in Belfast, Ireland.
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
I wondered how long...
24.07.2011 20:17
FFS, it's not an outrageous thing to have thought it might have been an fundamentalist Islamic attack, so suggesting it might be by anyone is hardly a terrible thing to have done.
Next they'll be people here suggesting it was a 'false flag' operation... I despair.
Global Research = not much research, more mentally deluded ideological speculation. Can't they be banned from here please?
Jack
Jacking Off
24.07.2011 20:29
As 1/294 'terrorist attacks' in Europe in 2009 was carried out by 'Islamist extremists' it IS outrageous to assume that it was Islamists.
http://www.dangardner.ca/index.php/articles/item/90-remember-that-eurabian-civil-war
fuck islamophobia
Islamophobia is a disease
25.07.2011 08:39
Norvello
e-mail: myemail@home.com
The question is appropriate: What did the CIA know?
25.07.2011 14:54
The Western politicians who were not capable to talk to the public without consulting their minders first said it was a matter of international terrorism, although the perpetrator is an European nationalist who has never been in Afghanistan. They would not have said that had their secret police minders told them that it was an internal European issue. The perpetrator displays a hatred of all things related to Karl Marx which could come directly out of a CIA think tank, and appears to be connected all over the international milieu of anticommunist venturers. His ideological poison carries the signature of the particularly virulent strain of anticommunism which employs a reverse interpretation of Antonio Gramsci´s theory of cultural hegemony to enable itself to masquerade as a rebel force before it seizes power. This strain developed when the CIA assimilated renegade Nazi rackets, and spread rapidly among the defeated souls whose infantile conservatism has taken the place of a mature insurrection in North America. When the gunman selected those he so grossly misperceived as the future elite of Marxism as his target, it was not only a sick self-hatred against European founding fathers, but also a ready-made ideological poison produced by the CIA - which is likely seeing this experiment as failed but too shy for public admissions and recalls. It is deeply ironic in itself when the secret police are in discord with their most empathic admirers. A CIA frontend such as the LGF blog was the first to publish the Fjordman theory, and has been in schism with its own ideological children since the latest change of parties in the White House made the North American secret police more powerful than under any previous administration, but to no avail. The anticommunist poison is out there in those sick minds causing this insane terror, and its fingerprints are all over it.
And now for a good laugh: http://bit.ly/obGNqr
pancake
How long before the pro-establishment, pro-imperial trolls show up...
25.07.2011 17:24
watcher