Six years on from an event with the largest single loss of life in London since the blitz can the Metropolitan Police, with it's long track record of complicity in facilitating Miscarriages of Justice be allowed to offer a 'narrative' which is so deeply flawed and suspect? How about a 'narrative' which has remained unexamined and unchallenged except by the July 7th Truth Campaign? A 'narrative' that has ascribed guilt to four men without their families having the opportunity and legal representation to question, particularly when the four accused have been denied their own Inquest proceedings? Or a 'narrative' deemed outside the scope of inquiry by the 7/7 Inquests, and a 'narrative' which has led to the demonisation of the Muslim population? This is the same flawed and unproven narrative that has been the basis for the questioning of multi-culturalism and a 'narrative' which has done much to fuel the race-hate and bigotry of the far-right neo-fascist organisation, the EDL.
Greetings from J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign,
On the 6th anniversary of 7/7, J7 are once again forced to reiterate our demand for a fully Independent Public Inquiry held outside of the constraints of the Inquiries Act 2005.
At the conclusion of the 7/7 Inquests, Lady Justice Hallett named the 4 accused, Khan, Tanweer, Hussain and Lindsay as the perpetrators of the events of 7/7, despite the clear legal constraints that apply to Coroners and their ability to apportion guilt. Hallett concluded the inquest proceedings by refusing to resume the Inquests into the deaths of the 4. As part of our efforts to get to the truth of 7/7, J7 submitted a clear, detailed and reasoned submission to the inquests outlining why the resumption of these Inquests was imperative. J7's submission for resumption can be read here
As we stated in our submission:
* The lack of representation of the families of the 4 men allowed any and all of the evidence presented to go unchallenged, meaning no witnesses called to the inquests were cross examined on behalf of the families of the accused.
* The Inquests sat without a jury.
* The Metropolitan Police investigation, Operation Theseus, was deemed to be outside the scope of the Inquests and thus the entire investigation behind Ian Blair's "largest criminal inquiry in English history" remains unexamined and unquestioned.
* The Inquests for the 4 accused, in which a verdict of suicide would require a criminal standard of proof, were not resumed.
There are many glaring holes in the evidence that was presented to the Inquests, as detailed on the J7: 7/7 Inquests Blog which we set-up specially to report on the inquests, yet these potential showstoppers for the official narrative of events went unreported in the mainstream media. The absolute pressing necessity for a fully independent Public Inquiry is now greater than ever in order to enable anyone to have any confidence in the evidence by which the guilt or innocence of the four accused might be established. To date there has been no proper legal scrutiny of this evidence. Furthermore, in cases of alleged suicide, the intent to commit suicide must be proven and this burden of proof has not yet been met.
Without a full Public Inquiry, it remains the case that:
* The bodies of Tanweer and Khan were not included in the 'Life Extinct' body counts carried out on 7th July by Dr Morgan Costello.
* The police viewing of the Luton Station CCTV footage was conducted as early as 10th July, despite the official account clearly stating that the men were identified on CCTV at King's Cross Thameslink on 11th July, and that it was this discovery that led the investigation to Luton as a possible site of interest.
* There exist no sightings of three of the men, Khan Tanweer and Lindsay, after the footage from King's Cross Thameslink, some way from the Underground tube network. Apparently the temporary CCTV system that was installed at King's Cross underground malfunctioned for the 20 crucial minutes between 8.30 and 8.50. Additionally, there are no recordings of the three from any other cameras. This means that there is absolutely no CCTV evidence that shows three of the accused anywhere on the London Underground network on the morning of 7 July 2005.
* No CCTV from the pre-explosion tube carriages has been released, despite this CCTV apparently existing, and despite it being crucial evidence which could confirm or deny that three of the men boarded the carrriages they are alleged to have boarded. This CCTV should also have been made available to Colonel Mahoney when the expensive modelling of likely injuries sustained by the deceased was conducted to make up for the lack of any internal post mortems on the victims.
* No CCTV exists from McDonald's showing whether Hussain actually used the premises to insert a new 9v battery into his apparently malfunctioning bomb, as it was revealed during the inquests that the store manager can be seen on CCTV (oh the irony) turning off the CCTV system before Hussain entered.
* No CCTV exists of Hasib Hussain on either of the buses he is alleged to have boarded. There is no footage of Hussain aboard the number 91 bus, nor the number 30 bus he is alleged to have destroyed, nor is there any street or traffic camera footage showing him boarding either bus.
* There is a huge discrepancy between the explosives allegedly used, as given in sworn evidence to the Jean Charles de Menezes Inquest, and the evidence that Clifford Todd gave to the 7/7 Inquests.
* There is strong evidence in the public domain to suggest that at the heart of the story behind 7/7 lay at least three operatives for both the British and American Intelligence services, one of which served an insanely short period in a US prison for greater crimes than those his testimony put behind bars for far longer terms, before being quietly released.
These questions and many more can be found on the 7/7 Inquests blog.
Six years on from an event with the largest single loss of life in London since the blitz can the Metropolitan Police, with it's long track record of complicity in facilitating Miscarriages of Justice -- and given the recent revelations that it is implicated in the Murdoch News of the World phone hacking scandal -- be allowed to offer a 'narrative' which is so deeply flawed and suspect? How about a 'narrative' which has remained unexamined and unchallenged except by J7? A 'narrative' that has ascribed guilt to four men without their families having the opportunity and legal representation to question, particularly when the four accused have been denied their own Inquest proceedings? Or a 'narrative' deemed outside the scope of inquiry by the 7/7 Inquests, and a 'narrative' which has led to the demonisation of the Muslim population? This is the same flawed and unproven narrative that has been the basis for the questioning of multi-culturalism and a 'narrative' which has done much to fuel the race-hate and bigotry of the far-right neo-fascist organisation, the EDL.
Current Prime Minister, David Cameron, has announced not one but two inquiries into the ongoing criminal exploits and activities of the press and police, just as news was breaking that the families of 7/7 victims were also victims of phone hacking at the hands of Murdoch media. This means that, as if we woke to find outselves in the midst of a Kafka novel, it is apparently right and proper to investigate whether or not the families of 7/7 victims had their mobile phones hacked, but it is not right and proper to have a full, in-depth, independent public investigation into how those same families of the 7/7 victims lost their loved ones.
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign continue to say NO! This will not stand! Only a fully Independent Public Inquiry held outside of the constraints of the Inquiries Act 2005 has the vaguest chance of getting to the truth behind the 'narrative' of 7/7.
J7 will be writing again in the near future to ask for your continued support in our joint campaign for the truth about 7/7, and we will provide a few suggestions for ways you can help us pressure the government into commissioning an independent public inquiry.
For truth and justice,
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign
--
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign
http://julyseventh.co.uk
Email:
julyseventh@fastmail.net
J7 Blog: http://j7truth.blogspot.com/
J7 Inquests Blog: http://77inquests.blogspot.com/
J7 Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/J7-The-July-7th-Truth-Campaign/124593657271
J7 Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=116996339581
J7 Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/j7truth
J7 Forum: http://z13.invisionfree.com/julyseventh
J7 MySpace: http://myspace.com/j7truth
On the 6th anniversary of 7/7, J7 are once again forced to reiterate our demand for a fully Independent Public Inquiry held outside of the constraints of the Inquiries Act 2005.
At the conclusion of the 7/7 Inquests, Lady Justice Hallett named the 4 accused, Khan, Tanweer, Hussain and Lindsay as the perpetrators of the events of 7/7, despite the clear legal constraints that apply to Coroners and their ability to apportion guilt. Hallett concluded the inquest proceedings by refusing to resume the Inquests into the deaths of the 4. As part of our efforts to get to the truth of 7/7, J7 submitted a clear, detailed and reasoned submission to the inquests outlining why the resumption of these Inquests was imperative. J7's submission for resumption can be read here
As we stated in our submission:
* The lack of representation of the families of the 4 men allowed any and all of the evidence presented to go unchallenged, meaning no witnesses called to the inquests were cross examined on behalf of the families of the accused.
* The Inquests sat without a jury.
* The Metropolitan Police investigation, Operation Theseus, was deemed to be outside the scope of the Inquests and thus the entire investigation behind Ian Blair's "largest criminal inquiry in English history" remains unexamined and unquestioned.
* The Inquests for the 4 accused, in which a verdict of suicide would require a criminal standard of proof, were not resumed.
There are many glaring holes in the evidence that was presented to the Inquests, as detailed on the J7: 7/7 Inquests Blog which we set-up specially to report on the inquests, yet these potential showstoppers for the official narrative of events went unreported in the mainstream media. The absolute pressing necessity for a fully independent Public Inquiry is now greater than ever in order to enable anyone to have any confidence in the evidence by which the guilt or innocence of the four accused might be established. To date there has been no proper legal scrutiny of this evidence. Furthermore, in cases of alleged suicide, the intent to commit suicide must be proven and this burden of proof has not yet been met.
Without a full Public Inquiry, it remains the case that:
* The bodies of Tanweer and Khan were not included in the 'Life Extinct' body counts carried out on 7th July by Dr Morgan Costello.
* The police viewing of the Luton Station CCTV footage was conducted as early as 10th July, despite the official account clearly stating that the men were identified on CCTV at King's Cross Thameslink on 11th July, and that it was this discovery that led the investigation to Luton as a possible site of interest.
* There exist no sightings of three of the men, Khan Tanweer and Lindsay, after the footage from King's Cross Thameslink, some way from the Underground tube network. Apparently the temporary CCTV system that was installed at King's Cross underground malfunctioned for the 20 crucial minutes between 8.30 and 8.50. Additionally, there are no recordings of the three from any other cameras. This means that there is absolutely no CCTV evidence that shows three of the accused anywhere on the London Underground network on the morning of 7 July 2005.
* No CCTV from the pre-explosion tube carriages has been released, despite this CCTV apparently existing, and despite it being crucial evidence which could confirm or deny that three of the men boarded the carrriages they are alleged to have boarded. This CCTV should also have been made available to Colonel Mahoney when the expensive modelling of likely injuries sustained by the deceased was conducted to make up for the lack of any internal post mortems on the victims.
* No CCTV exists from McDonald's showing whether Hussain actually used the premises to insert a new 9v battery into his apparently malfunctioning bomb, as it was revealed during the inquests that the store manager can be seen on CCTV (oh the irony) turning off the CCTV system before Hussain entered.
* No CCTV exists of Hasib Hussain on either of the buses he is alleged to have boarded. There is no footage of Hussain aboard the number 91 bus, nor the number 30 bus he is alleged to have destroyed, nor is there any street or traffic camera footage showing him boarding either bus.
* There is a huge discrepancy between the explosives allegedly used, as given in sworn evidence to the Jean Charles de Menezes Inquest, and the evidence that Clifford Todd gave to the 7/7 Inquests.
* There is strong evidence in the public domain to suggest that at the heart of the story behind 7/7 lay at least three operatives for both the British and American Intelligence services, one of which served an insanely short period in a US prison for greater crimes than those his testimony put behind bars for far longer terms, before being quietly released.
These questions and many more can be found on the 7/7 Inquests blog.
Six years on from an event with the largest single loss of life in London since the blitz can the Metropolitan Police, with it's long track record of complicity in facilitating Miscarriages of Justice -- and given the recent revelations that it is implicated in the Murdoch News of the World phone hacking scandal -- be allowed to offer a 'narrative' which is so deeply flawed and suspect? How about a 'narrative' which has remained unexamined and unchallenged except by J7? A 'narrative' that has ascribed guilt to four men without their families having the opportunity and legal representation to question, particularly when the four accused have been denied their own Inquest proceedings? Or a 'narrative' deemed outside the scope of inquiry by the 7/7 Inquests, and a 'narrative' which has led to the demonisation of the Muslim population? This is the same flawed and unproven narrative that has been the basis for the questioning of multi-culturalism and a 'narrative' which has done much to fuel the race-hate and bigotry of the far-right neo-fascist organisation, the EDL.
Current Prime Minister, David Cameron, has announced not one but two inquiries into the ongoing criminal exploits and activities of the press and police, just as news was breaking that the families of 7/7 victims were also victims of phone hacking at the hands of Murdoch media. This means that, as if we woke to find outselves in the midst of a Kafka novel, it is apparently right and proper to investigate whether or not the families of 7/7 victims had their mobile phones hacked, but it is not right and proper to have a full, in-depth, independent public investigation into how those same families of the 7/7 victims lost their loved ones.
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign continue to say NO! This will not stand! Only a fully Independent Public Inquiry held outside of the constraints of the Inquiries Act 2005 has the vaguest chance of getting to the truth behind the 'narrative' of 7/7.
J7 will be writing again in the near future to ask for your continued support in our joint campaign for the truth about 7/7, and we will provide a few suggestions for ways you can help us pressure the government into commissioning an independent public inquiry.
For truth and justice,
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign
--
J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign
http://julyseventh.co.uk Email:
julyseventh@fastmail.net J7 Blog:
http://j7truth.blogspot.com/ J7 Inquests Blog:
http://77inquests.blogspot.com/ J7 Facebook Page:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/J7-The-July-7th-Truth-Campaign/124593657271 J7 Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=116996339581 J7 Petition:
http://www.petitiononline.com/j7truth J7 Forum:
http://z13.invisionfree.com/julyseventh J7 MySpace:
http://myspace.com/j7truth
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Really?
08.07.2011 16:55
Richard
e-mail:
richard-brennan@hotmail.co.uk
Homepage:
http://brennybaby.blogspot.com
dicky link Dick
08.07.2011 18:54
redirects to some data mining scam or somethink
Huh, do we really have to put up with this sub standard service.
Perky
Flashback: "7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction" - Documentary on 2005 London bombings
08.07.2011 19:17
The Guardian, 8 July 2005
7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction
(released 3 August 2010)
The July 7th Truth Campaign is happy to recommend "7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction" (2010) to anyone interested in the events July 2005 London bombings is one that updates and expands greatly on the information presented in "Ludicrous Diversion" (2006), and also helps place the events of 7/7 in a wider historical and political context.
"Investigative documentary 7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction which examines some of the questions and conspiracy theories about 7/7 the July 7th 2005 London Bombings. The first half of the film examines covert operations from three different periods - Central America 1954-63, Italy 1945-1990 and Afghanistan/Pakistan 1979-Present day. These operations are used to provide context to the second half of the film, which is a detailed analysis not only of the events of the day of 7/7, but of the intelligence and security policy of the War on Terror in which 7/7 happened."
The full film can be watched here on the VeeHD web site:
7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction
from 77Archive
The full video is also available on blip.tv:
Alternatively, you can watch the film in 18 parts using the YouTube playlist version:
__________________________________
The July 7th Truth Campaign
Homepage:
http://julyseventh.co.uk/j7-films-ludicrous-diversion-seeds-of-deconstruction.html#77SeedsofDeconstruction
British government: We wasted millions chasing wrong terrorist threats
08.07.2011 19:27
The Times, 7 June 2011
Daily Telegraph, 6 June 2011
Yorkshire Post, 8 June 2011
Sunday Telegraph, 5 June 2011
The Independent, 6 May 2011
Right, a memorial to the victims of the 7th July 2005 bombings, Hyde Park, London.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
British government: We wasted millions chasing wrong terrorist threats
[propaganda alert]
compiled by Cem Ertür
11 June 2011
1) British government: We wasted millions chasing wrong terrorist threats (7 June 2011)
2) British minister: Universities complacent over Islamic radicals (5 June 2011)
3) Britain’s top police officer defends the use of dum dum bullets (17 May 2011)
__________________________________
“Intelligence indicates that a terrorist attack in our country is ‘highly likely’. Experience tells us that the threat comes not just from foreign nationals but also from terrorists born and bred in Britain. It is therefore vital that our counter-terrorism strategy contains a plan to prevent radicalisation and stop would-be terrorists from committing mass murder. Osama bin Laden may be dead, but the threat from Al Qa’ida inspired terrorism is not.” [1]
“Millions of pounds have been squandered overseas on anti-extremism projects that produced no security benefits, while crucial efforts to counter home-grown terrorism remain underfunded, the [British] Government will admit today.” [2]
“The new Prevent [counter-terrorism strategy] [...] makes clear that there will be no more ungoverned spaces — particularly in higher and further education, in the NHS [Britain’s National Health Service] and the charities sector. To this end the review imposes a duty of care on universities to safeguard students, staff, and the wider community from dangerous radicals. [...] [T]he Preventing Extremism Unit within the Department for Education is seen by many as a role model” [3]
__________________________________
“[Britain’s Interior Minister] Theresa May told The Daily Telegraph that universities were not taking the issue of radicalisation seriously enough and that it was too easy for Muslim extremists to form groups on campuses “without anyone knowing”. [...]
Mrs May made her comments ahead of the publication this week of the updated version of the Prevent counter-terrorism strategy.
“I think for too long there’s been complacency around universities,” she said. “I don’t think they have been sufficiently willing to recognise what can be happening on their campuses and the radicalisation that can take place. I think there is more that universities can do.”
Mrs May said universities had to “send very clear messages” and “ask themselves some questions about what happens on their campuses”. [...]
As part of the Prevent [counter-terrorism] strategy, the [British] Government will define as extremists anyone who “does not subscribe to human rights, equality before the law, democracy and full participation in society”, including those who “promote or implicitly tolerate the killing of British soldiers”. ” [4]
__________________________________
“[London’s] Metropolitan Police is to issue all its firearms officers with the type of ammunition used to kill Jean Charles De Menezes. Hollow point bullets flatten and widen on impact, causing maximum damage to vital organs. [..] Mr De Menezes, a Brazillian falsely identified as a suicide bomber, was shot dead in 2005 with hollow point bullets.” [5]
“Britain's most senior police officer has defended issuing bullets similar to so-called dum dum ammunition as standard to Scotland Yard marksmen. Sir Paul Stephenson said the hollow-point bullets were chosen by his force after a series of trials because they were less likely to pass through a body and hit an innocent passer-by. [...]
The Metropolitan Police Commissioner told LBC radio that the reasons behind the decision were “not for the squeamish”, adding that the bullet “reduces the potential of collateral damage”. [...] “The reality is we think it's appropriate.” ” [6]
__________________________________
notes:
[1] Prevent Strategy
Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty
Home Office website, June 2011
[2] Millions wasted chasing 'wrong' terrorist threats (*)
Money spent abroad was needed at home, report says
by Sean O'Neill, The Times, 7 June 2011
[3] The Prevent test for Islamists is just fair play (*)
Commitment to our values should be compulsory. We cannot tolerate intolerance
by Dean Godson, The Times, 7 June 2011
[4] 'Complacency’ in universities over Islamic radicals (*)
by Duncan Gardham, Daily Telegraph, 5 June 2011
[5] Met Police to use Jean Charles De Menezes death bullets
BBC, 11 May 2011
[6] Police head defends dum dum bullets
Press Association, 17 May 2011
(*) title of the print edition
__________________________________
related documents:
Remarks by the President to Parliament in London, United Kingdom
White House website, 25 May 2011
Not just special, but an essential relationship (*)
Prime Minister David Cameron and US President Barack Obama have written a joint article for the Times at the start of the US State Visit to the UK.
by David Cameron and Barack Obama, The Times, 24 May 2011
Prime Minister: “While Bin Laden is gone, the threat of Al Qaeda remains”
Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a statement to the House of Commons on the death of Osama Bin Laden and wider counter-terrorism issues.
Number10.gov.uk (the official website of the UK Prime Minister's Office), 3 May 2011
Teaching methods that help to build resilience to extremism: rapid evidence assessment
Department for Education, May 2011
PM’s speech at Munich Security Conference
Prime Minister David Cameron has delivered a speech setting out his view on radicalisation and Islamist extremism.
Number10.gov.uk (the official website of the UK Prime Minister's Office), 5 February 2011
Channel: Supporting individuals vulnerable to recruitment by violent extremists
A guide for local partnerships
Produced in partnership with the Association of Chief Police Officers
Association of Police Authorities website, March 2010
(*) title of the print edition
__________________________________
related news:
Yorkshire cities to lead renewed drive against Islamist terror (*)
Yorkshire Post, 8 June 2011
Shops warned over terrorist threat to food (*)
Food and drink sold in Britain is under a growing threat from terrorist groups which might try to poison supplies, the Government’s security advisers have warned.
by Richard Gray, Sunday Telegraph, 5 June 2011
A moment of closure for victims of terror (*)
As Barack Obama lays a wreath at Ground Zero, and the inquest into the 2005 London bombings prepares to give its verdict...
by Cahal Milmo and Sarah Morrison, The Independent, 6 May 2011
Police need more powerful weapons to combat ‘Mumbai-style terror attacks’ says police chief
Daily Mail, 15 April 2010
(*) title of the print edition
__________________________________
related articles:
Government recruits doctors to become thought police, pinpoint potential terrorists among their patients
by Ethan A. Huff, Natural News, 8 June 2011
The Anglo-American relationship: Vision of a war without end
Obama's visit. Part II
by Felicity Arbuthnot, Global Research, 5 June 2011
Obama's UK-fest : Vision of a war without end
by Felicity Arbuthnot, Global Research, 31 May 2011
The Anglo-American military axis: West backs holy alliance for control of Arab world and Persian Gulf
by Rick Rozoff, Global Research, 26 May 2011
Britain's war on Islam
by Stephen Lendman, SteveLendmanBlog, 11 January 2011
Britain: More revelations about secret shoot-to-kill policy at de Menezes inquest
by Paul Mitchell, World Socialist Website, 25 November 2008
__________________________________
propaganda alerts:
UK Foreign Minister: We will continue to fight against terrorism wherever it rears its head
by Cem Ertür, 911Blogger, 5 May 2011
WikiLeaks: London is a hub of al-Qaeda’s global terrorism network
by Cem Ertür, 911Blogger, 29 April 2011
MI5: Our ‘regret’ over failing to prevent 7/7 bombings
by Cem Ertür, 911Blogger, 22 February 2011
__________________________________
Cem Ertür
Homepage:
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-06-10/british-government-we-wasted-millions-chasing-wrong-terrorist-threats
[audio] Former police intelligence analyst: 7/7 was an inside job
08.07.2011 20:43
Yorks police intel. analyst: 7/7 was inside job
A-Infos Radio Project website, 8 July 2011
EXCLUSIVE - Radio interview this evening with Tony Farrell who was sacked for his beliefs
Tony Farrell was a principle police intelligence analyst for South Yorkshire police but he was sacked when he told his bosses what they didn't want to hear, that the 7/7 London Bombings were not carried out by Muslim terrorists but by the enemy within.
Bristol Broadband Co-operative
Homepage:
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/53018
The 9/11 truth is out on the internet
11.07.2011 00:42
This is the 9/11 truth: The WTC was destroyed by 3 underground thermo-nuclear explosions. They were detonated by the US government which used this as an excuse to lead the US and its allies into invading Afghanistan and Iraq. All these wars and deaths were based on a lie.
Goebbels: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
Will you help to tell the truth to the world?
www.mathaba.net/news/?x=625926
www.911-truth.net/
Be sure to watch the 26 part video there.
#4 is on the built-in nuclear demolition scheme of the WTC
www.911-truth.net/911_WTC_nuclear_demolition_Dimitri_Khalezov_part04.mp4
#14 in on Building 7, which collapsed even though no plane hit it.
www.911-truth.net/911_WTC_nuclear_demolition_Dimitri_Khalezov_part14.mp4
#24/25 is on the chronic radiation sickness of the WTC responders
www.911-truth.net/911_WTC_nuclear_demolition_Dimitri_Khalezov_part24.mp4
www.911-truth.net/911_WTC_nuclear_demolition_Dimitri_Khalezov_part25.mp4
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNh1Isb20tw&feature=player_embedded
careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com/2011/05/911-comparing-building-implosions.html
anonymous
e-mail:
indymedia.20.xyz1@spamgourmet.com
Is Tony Farrell an inside job?
13.07.2011 07:00
For those who would like to look at this story in a little more detail:
Caz