The person killed is claimed to be male by the name of Usama Bin Laden (also Osama) who, the US is claiming, was resident in Pakistan. This man has been regularly broadcast on US TV and internet broadcasts since 2001 very often accompanied by chatter from the Central Intelligence Agency emanating from their HQ in the Pentagon and from within CIA affiliated news organisations in New York and Washington.
The claim is currently being disseminated by state controlled media in the US and UK, joined by overt and covert members of the Security and Intelligence Services posing as analysts and media commentators. Critical analysis appears to be on hold across the board at present with no detectable attempt by media corporations to challenge or properly qualify the reports being made by western intelligence sources.
It is extremely unlikely that the current narrative will be excepted in its current form and suspicions are now raised that the US and British governments have very seriously misjudged the public view of the situation, the majority view being that Al Qaida is a myth and the atrocity carried out in New York in 2001 was a prelude to a resource war for oil and gas in the Middle-East waged by Industrial Globalist's in pursuit of security of energy supply for the west and major economies of the east. A policy that continues with the current campaign being waged in Libya by Nato in order to seize the required oil resources in order to 'effect' the price of oil on the international markets. The price of oil being a serious and persistent barrier to economic growth of western economies at present.
The announcement of Bin Laden's death appears within 24 hours of the exposure of an assassination attempt by Nato against the libyan leader Khaddafi with the highly illegal bombing of Khaddafi's residence in Tripoli, certainly the result of a policy of deliberate targeting of foreign heads of state by Nato generals.
Today's announcement is certainly backed by little or no evidence with an extraordinary claim that the body of Bin Laden has been buried at sea. A claim that infers that the US is now completely dependent on US nationalists to defend on internet forums and websites globally almost certainly with the use of 'trolling', a process whereby fact that runs counter to the interests of the state is re-worked into deranged or inaccurate speculation or infantilised in order to de-legitimise widely held logic and reason. This process has been persistently in use by the US and UK state bodies throughout the declaration of the current resource wars by Republican President George Bush in 2001.
At present, unreliable state agents acting within media corporations are attempting to build the narrative that today's announcement is universally accepted in the UK and US and reaction against the announcement is isolated to Afghanistan, thereby accelerating domestic hostility to the Afghan people and bolstering domestic support for US and UK military presence there, perhaps a sign of over confidence in the recent 'unifying' symbolism enacted by the recent military/state wedding which took place in London and which is widely hoped to draw a line under seething public resentment at the persistent lying and fraudulent activities of the British Parliament over recent years.
This morning, various state agents and military actors embedded within western media corporations have attempted to claim that Al Qaida are about to 'respond' to the death of Bin Laden raising the ugly spectre of domestic western terrorism once more. It is now possible that 'elements' within the United States may once again be plotting further atrocities on its own territory or on the territory of foreign nations in order to further consolidate its now decade long resource war and undisguised and barely hidden venom against muslim races in the region.
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Oh dear!
02.05.2011 11:45
Images, Video, DNA, Blood, medical evidence.
Should be appearing from now.
Looking forward to it.
Langolier
buried at sea?
02.05.2011 12:37
x
Death to the infidel.
02.05.2011 13:56
I disagree. The world is waiting for compelling evidence to confirm the claims the Americans are making.
And worringly, media reports trying to suggest that anything that deviates from the official narrative are conspiracy theories are already appearing, which is always a sign of pre-rehearsed wrongdoing!
Telegraph "Osama bin Laden dead? Now for an explosion of conspiracy theories" published May 2nd 2011.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100085976/osama-bin-laden-dead-now-for-an-explosion-of-conspiracy-theories/
To be perfectly honest with you, I think you have to be psychologically a bit ill to expect that people are going to swallow this line without any evidence.
Absolutely nobody is going to take the Americans at their word.
We should be naturally suspicious as most media are reporting the "Osama Bin Laden is Dead" rather than "Americans claim Osama Bin Laden Dead" which would be a lot more responsible (and accurate!!!).
The images and video should be out into the public domain by tonight UK time.
British Terrorist.
Still nothing!
02.05.2011 14:15
Maybe the soldiers left the lens cap on the camera and the pictures didn't come out!!!
Tip-Off
the limit
02.05.2011 15:42
my question
he he he
02.05.2011 16:47
I suppose we'll know for sure in a few hours. The world is waiting.
anon
Face Palm
03.05.2011 12:00
Telegraph "Osama bin Laden dead? Now for an explosion of conspiracy theories" published May 2nd 2011.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100085976/osama-bin-laden-dead-now-for-an-explosion-of-conspiracy-theories/ "
So hear we have the old canard that the media are in on it, which is frankly ridiculous, as an atheist and a member of several Skeptic forums I have to inform you that Skeptics are talking about an explosion of conspiracy theories too, it was my first though also!
By your own logical fallacy, I and the many members of Skeptic and Atheist forums (some of whom are anarchists like me), are also in on this rehearsed wrongdoing, when in actual fact it's obvious CT'ers are going to have a field day, and furthermore, like 9/11 will run with their first conclusions in the face of evidence released to the contrary as the story unfolds.
My advice is to hold back until you have the full story, and put across a considered argument if there is one.
James Allen