This is an Anonymous reply to an article which a German indymedia node flagged as conspiracy theory. It is more probable that they were right to do so than not, but Anonymous wants to know from Geral Sosby, who stated there that he was a former cop capable of leaking evidence of a secret castration program. It remains unclear whether he did himself post it on indymedia or someone who claims to have spoken to him. His website speaks for itself, but whether he does remains obscure. There he also makes grave allegations on American indymedia nodes which cannot remain unanswered. So here we go, cop.
https://linksunten.indymedia.org/en/hidden/node/35219 Just that you are a renegade agent does not mean that you were in the same situation as a runaway target. You chose to work with them against us before you chose to work with us against them. If the indymedia node you mentioned was indeed a false flag operation (unreachable as of this writing) then it might not be the right place for what you have got to say anyways. But if the false flag operation is your appearance then indymedia as a network would be well advised to treat you as what you are. Was your posting on that node related to a local incident, or is it just a planetary warning like the one your handlers gave a while ago when the political climate changed in favor of the insurrection?
By the way potency pills are being offered to Anonymous all the time... our email spamboxes are full of them. But they also are full of banking and insurance trash, and a lot of other things that hint at perpetrators who can afford to throw money out of the window like a surveillance bureaucracy feeding from income taxation. For this to be rogue businessmen certainly there must be a lot of economic opportunity in someone taking the bait to make it worth being censored by a thousand spam assassins before getting there, and for the resulting pollution of the namespace to be an unintended consequence the market must be quite mad. But Anonymous has never encountered a person claiming that they worked for the American government and that they wanted to offer potency pills both at the same time, so Anonymous talks from a certain mental distance when it comes to attempts of pharmaceutical castration.
Please elaborate why an opponent who is otherwise bound to its preference of invisible torture over visible torture (Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, Quantico) would in some instances chose to leave the most barbarian of traces which could and would be presented as hard forensic evidence in any public accusation. Someone telling in public the three letters poisoned my dick would certainly be believed more than anyone else telling about anything less obvious the three letters might have done to them. Is this a special type of torture applied against targets who are expected to never get free again, or is it a long time enabling plot of Josef Mengele wannabes, or both? The way you present it does not make any sense other than scaring a scared person even more, and comes close to or is to be summarised as pollution (most of all places in the country that produced him).
Anonymous knows that the CIA or FBI is no better than the KGB, or the German uberwachungsstaat for that matter. They're all dead meat even when they hide behind a smiling Buddha, or spam on the face of the Earth if you like, and if you actually want independent activists to believe anything of your account then you have to be more useful than the usual panic peddlers. A lot more. If what you are telling is the case, including the attempt thereof, then there is quite some organisational structure and logs to be conquered from it. It's how many jobs? How many clueless relatives? How many targets, how many betrayed relatives there? How much taxpayer money per dick? Per attempt? In its own terms this program considers itself how much of a success? Have you come to indymedia for cooperation or for a co-operation? Where are the eunuchs?
