exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing
colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial
projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European
settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative
is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the
original inhabitants.
African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual
conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This
year's conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial
project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and
Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction,
dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new
Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to
reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its
potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and
exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing
colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial
projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European
settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative
is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the
original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick
Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and
professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the
logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate
the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices
that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an
event."
Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler
colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not
merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel,
nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to
highlight Zionism's structural continuities and the ideology which
informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward
Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a
spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a
preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the
precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of
Zionist settlement in Palestine.
Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the
Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion]
carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have
stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by
an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian
nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to
fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its
control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices
take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime
bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft,
identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall,
the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on
willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements,
all with the continued support and backing of imperial power.
Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial
paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served
as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian
political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of
committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and
Jews.
The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm
was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do
current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place
address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the
creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when
exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial"
condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a
"post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist"
society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and
reservations become "state-building"?
Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and
their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own
history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this
internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist
settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and
empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the
indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement-from Arizona to
Auckland.
SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to
be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.
For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and
understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and
struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and
the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push
the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments
and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine
through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual
and political impact of Edward Said's life and work (2004),
international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of
Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of
Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in
Palestine (2010).
For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual
conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine:
www.soaspalsoc.org
SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed
students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences
on Palestine since 2003.
http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/661/past-is-present_settler-colonialism-matters
______
[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of
Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event,
Cassell, London, p. 163
[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9.
January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412