This thurs 17th at Doncaster Racecourse 9am onwards
hundreds of businesses will be attending this grooming event to get on board the nuclear gravy train and earn more profit and power for arms companies like Rolls Royce, Boeing, Costain and the many other associated crooks!
While they plot out our landscape for new nuclear dumps and power stations they continue to poison our land and communities with their existing nuclear facilities and dumps. Fast tracking the open cast coal and selling off forests that will fuel these new nuclear facilities this 'rennaissance' agenda is raping our earth and condeming our future.
http://namrc.group.shef.ac.uk/events/winning-business-in-the-nuclear-renaissance/
Doncaster Racecourse is approx a mile from the centre's train station.
Comments
Hide the following 16 comments
Coal?
16.02.2011 14:25
Costain's got nowt to do with arms. Not sure what Boeing's got to do with nuclear either.
Protest if you like, but at least get your facts right.
Fingerbob
More of the same
16.02.2011 15:01
http://www.sellafieldsites.com/forum/15/new
Antinuke
spook?
16.02.2011 15:07
boeing is a sponser of the factory of the future and NAMRC at the AMP and it doesnt take much to see thats its all related and fuelling the same obscene regime, its not that hard to research so do your own same goes for costain
your comments are only on here to try and demoralise and distract from the truth your games up
come on people dont be discouraged by this nonsense
nuclear is nwo
Meanwhile, in the real word.
16.02.2011 18:05
Fingerbob
lol
16.02.2011 18:07
artfulldodger
what
16.02.2011 18:12
artfulldodger
Der..
16.02.2011 18:16
-----------------
But of course, twas only just last week that I saw a coal powered steam train transporting uranium rods to a nuclear waste dump. (And please don’t give me the coal = electricity = train power argument as heavy trainsport train run on diesel)
I don’t really know a lot about the subject, please enlighten me, what part does coal play in the nuclear process, do nuclear power stations need fuelling with coal?
Also what’s concrete coal? If your referring to fly ash? That’s an existing by product of coal powerd electricity production, and can be used as a supplement to concrete. Its good quality stuff that can be used to part replace the cement and can actually improve the concrete strength and will result in the concrete having a lower embodied energy..
Anyway, you’ll probably now just call me a troll/government agent for having a different option to you...
Engineer
good option to follow
16.02.2011 19:07
All the trouble in the middle east, its like when oil rose in the 70s (but we had the north sea reserves then). Its time we reduced our reliance on them, otherwise we are in danger of having no electricity.
Its a no-brainer to me, its clean, fuel comes from stable countries.
Nuclear is definitely good a lot of positive points about it.
simon
Come off it
16.02.2011 20:48
I'm not saying nuclear's the answer to all our problems, but if you don't like it, at least try and base your case on the facts not on self-righteous fantasy.
'Sustainable energy without the hot air' figures that nuclear produces about 4% of the CO2 emissions of coal, even counting for the mining, construction, etc. Good book - if you're at all interested in energy, you should read it.
Fingerbob
worth keeping eye on
16.02.2011 21:15
Surely - its better than burning coal - which produces lots of CO2?
(even through countries like China / India / Brazil will continue to burn coal and they are much bigger than us - so its wont make a blind bit of difference if we stop using coal anyway).
I think the best reason for nuclear options is to cut our reliance of the Middle East's resources who never seem to stop fighting.
Can't think of any other feasible alternatives. Solar is out. Wind isn't great. Tidal isn't an option.
Nuclear seems a good option until we find something else.
ted rockson
crap
16.02.2011 21:49
artfulldodger
Accidents never happen (and even when they do...)
17.02.2011 13:35
On another note, directing abusive comments at people who question your theories (even if they are correct) is unnecessary and is likely to put people off/annoy them rather than encourage them to investigate further!
zarniwoop
e-mail: zarniwoop@aktivix.org
rennaisance? rennaissance?
18.02.2011 07:24
Renaissance man
Ignorance and propoganda
18.02.2011 13:24
In exiting this event, I was handed, by one of two (yes, count them) female protesters, an appalling leaflet, containing graphic images of mutant babies. These cases, I have subsequently discovered, are documented as originating from Afghanistan and are alleged to be caused by the use of depleted uranium weaponry. I fail to see what relevance this bears to supply chain, quality and legislative issues, surrounding the future construction of UK nuclear power generation facilities.
The production and deployment of nuclear weapons, to kill and maim, and the generation of energy from nuclear materials to generate energy, in an attempt to alleviate the global energy crisis, are entirely disparate pursuits, undertaken with very different aims and intentions. They have only one thing in common; the word nuclear, the meaning of which is totally variable, dependent on context.
I hope those two women read this, before they decide to stage another ill-informed protest. They showed about as much intelligence as the BNP; inasmuch that not every Muslim is an Islamic fundamentalist, not every application of nuclear technology is undertaken with the aim of causing death and human suffering.
Jessica Wells
e-mail: jplaysguitar@msn.com
its all related
21.02.2011 18:49
nuclear waste equals depleted uranium
25 years since chernobyl
21.02.2011 18:57
remember?