Using the BBC he said the Egyptian revolt was a "moment of excitement but uncertainty" and the West should engage with supporters of democracy across the Middle East.
Speaking on the Andrew Marr show, regularly used by Mr Blair since he took the universally unpopular decision to commit British armed forces to the highly illegal and costly invasion of Iraq, he said "We should have a strategy of engagement with the democratic, modernising forces across the region. We should be helping countries evolve and move in the direction of change."
Mr Blair in his position as British Prime Minister has regularly opposed being called to account for his part in the deaths of almost 900,000 Iraqi's during the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq and has routinely chosen deception to avoid criminal proceedings over his conduct. A fact widely considered to be anti-democratic and an affront to the rule of law by the majority in the UK.
Mr Blair has also highlighted the scope of change taking place in Egypt and hinted at the consequences that may follow for those deemed anti-democratic by those engaged in the change that now appears to be on the horizon. Mr Blair said "This is a region in transition. The question is where is it transiting? It can either go towards an open-minded, modern type of democracy, let's hope that it does, or it could be swung into something narrow and extreme and closed-minded."
The comments will anger many, for whom Mr Blair is no respecter of the principle of Democracy. For Mr Blairs critics, he is an arch schemer with little or no respect for the people who rides roughshod over Democracy with lies and deception disseminated through the media which has in the past led to serial human rights abuses, large scale refugee movements of entirely innocent people and loss of life measured in the hundreds of thousands, many of whom have been children.
Mr Blair went onto say "I think there's every possibility that we get the first and not the second and our purpose as the West should be to engage insofar as possible to bring about that more benign scenario."
Analysts around the world consider the Egyptian uprising symptomatic of the worsening scale of Western influence in the region pointing to the widespread belief that the outgoing Hosni Mubarak is a western client that has just been toppled by the Egyptian people themselves. Indicating that the revolt is far from "benign" as Mr Blair is attempting to suggest.
Mr Blair continues to employ public relations consultants to manage public opinion over his conduct in the past but despite engaging with several publicity stunts including his taking voluntary employment as a largely benign "peace envoy" and earlier releasing the heavily edited book of his selective memoirs, public opinion remains entrenched against him. Mr Blair continues to give lectures on the subject of faith and religion which are ordinarily dismissed as meaningless by scholars from all fields and genuine followers of the faiths.
Mr Blair also defended Mr Mubarak, saying: "You can't invite him to the White House five months ago, and I was there with President (Barack) Obama, as a partner in peace and them simply forget all that. "He was a force for stability in the region and in the peace process, there were economic changes in Egypt that were beneficial over the past years but, having said that, the reason why this is a moment of huge exhilaration and excitement and opportunity is that there were a whole lot of forces for democracy, for change for economic and social reform in Egypt that were held back and those are now unleashed."
With the departing of the Western client Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian people have now released themselves from the shackles of organised political paralysis signalling that the will of the Egyptian people can now more readily be felt across the region. For Mr Blair, who has long claimed to be in favour of a Palestinian state, but who has acted persistently to prevent it from forming, the revolt in Egypt can only be filled with foreboding. It represents an end to Mr Blairs political "technique" of associating himself with a political cause...in order to handicap and disable it by "incompetent association".
For Mr Blair, the Egyptian revolt is the harbinger of the end
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
Wicker man
13.02.2011 19:32
Mr Blair speaks only for himself and his paymasters, he is not a man of peace. He is a man of war who pretends to be a man of peace. There are those in the west who believe him because they have no experience of war, there are those who look at him as they look at actors on the screen and see only the character who dances, smiles and entertains.
For those who have been killed and tormented he is a tyrant who lies, cheats, deceives and misleads for the glory of being a great western leader. For us, this is a man who maims the innocent and kills the children in order to be flattered by historians. This is a Panthiest and a heretic.
Let the people of Egypt light the candle that will burn this heretic to the ground.
Peace and justice to you all. Our time is near.
Kinshasa
One for the history books!
13.02.2011 21:21
Still turning up on the Andrew "biggest cunt at the beeb" Marr show too. Biggest cunt except that useless fuckwit Jeremy Vine that is. Oh and not forgetting tit of the century John "can I have your autograph guvnor" Sopel.
Does he still live round the corner from Hyde Park that Blair? Our friends from the FL are defo inaresteyed!
Frank Stan, the man.
Very intelligent confused person!
13.02.2011 21:24
non e mousse.
egypt filling the void
13.02.2011 21:50
Watch what happens next - don't draw hasty conclusions.
paul
Spectacles for a glass-eyed man.
13.02.2011 22:47
Watch what happens next - don't draw hasty conclusions."
There is confusion but only outside Egypt.
For instance this is a movement that started of its own accord. As it grew naturally, elements in the US, the UK and Israel fought hard to "take the credit" for its organisation leaving people with the suspicion that the CIA, MI6 and Mossad were involved. The end result...as always, has been that the Egyptian people have been robbed of their natural support and as a direct result of that, a new "western client" will be installed once the Egyptian people have been dispersed.
This is not in any way exceptional or out of the ordinary.
What is exceptional this time around, is that this "tapping" in Egypt, was immediately emulated elsewhere right on cue. What we have seen is a desire in muslim countries, for non-western centric Democracy as opposed to the more illegitimate western-centric democracy.
A very important distinction to make.
Ask yourselves this question. How quickly did you see through this so-called revolution?
And then follow it with this question. What makes you different to an Egyptian?
Mr Blair is old order, that order just died.
Vision On