Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Civil Disobedience at Downing Street for 9/11 Justice

Cosmos | 06.02.2011 21:55 | Repression | Terror War | Sheffield | World

Gareth reports:

On Monday 31st January 2011, in solidarity with Jon Gold’s action outside the White House, I took a ‘911 Truth’ sign to Downing Street – the British Prime Minister lives at No. 10 – and sat down outside the gates. Within seconds I was approached by a policeman carrying a machine gun who demanded I immediately move, a request with which I respectfully declined to comply with. After ten minutes I was approached by two Ministry of Defence policemen who issued the same request. We talked a little about 9/11. Moments later a police van pulled up and four police officers got out – I was also surprised to see a further four Ministry of Defence policeman approaching to see what was going on. After explaining that I was respectfully going to decline all further requests to move on I found myself being dragged from where I was sitting, put into the police van, and driven away to Charing Cross Police Station

I was released later the next evening having been detained for 30 hours. I’m glad I took a good book!







An Interview with Gareth

9/11 Truth News: Why is 9/11 worth going to jail for?

Gareth: As a result of Monday’s action many of the Downing Street and Ministry of Defence security detail got to find out there was guy with a ‘911 Truth’ sign refusing to go away who had to be carried off by police officers. That starts off all kinds of conversational chain reactions. So in that respect it was worth it.

A friend said to me once that the only rightful place for a peaceful person to be during times of war is in prison. I think it’s a really interesting statement and one I believe to be true. If every person of conscience, every person claiming to be against the war performed non-violent civil disobedience of this kind, the state could no longer claim to be legitimately democratic. It’s certainly a tactic that I intend to repeat and I hope others explore for themselves.

It is also worth mentioning a UK act of Parliament called the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. This legislation, similar in tone to the US Patriot Act, not only grants the police unprecedented powers to search and arrest people but certain sections of the act ban all unauthorised protests within 1 kilometre of Parliament unless written permission is requested from the police 6 days in advance. Even if authorisation is obtained the police are allowed to impose conditions on a protest – and in the case of Downing Street all protests have effectively been banned. Instead they allow protestors to stand in fenced box over 30 metres away across the road, where you can’t be seen.

Unjust laws are one of the consequences of the Post-9/11 world. Brutal wars, torture, demonisation of muslim and non-white communities are some of the other undesirable social, political and cultural injustices and there are many, many more. All are excellent reasons for civil disobedience.

911TN: At what level do you find the receptivity to this topic within the anti-war movement in England? Is there the same sort of disconnect that we’ve seen in the USA, where people don’t seem to quite grasp the relevance of the legitimacy of the 9/11 story (or lack of it) to the prosecution of what we’ve been promised is an endless war?

Gareth: The receptivity in the UK is poor, no doubt about that. I have spoken privately to representatives of the largest UK anti-war organisation – the Stop the War Coalition – and although many of them have expressed doubts about the official story, I strongly suspect the reason they don’t speak publicly about them has to do with the ‘third rail’ recently written about by Jon Gold. Defined by Wikipedia as “a metaphor in politics to denote an idea or topic that is so ‘charged’ and’untouchable’ that any politician or public official who dares to broach the subject would invariably suffer politically.” I think that sadly with the subject of 9/11 a similar fear is a major contributing factor to the deafening silence from the leading figures of the anti-war movement. Despite the fact there is more than enough compelling evidence proving high level US complicity in 9/11, no one wants to be labelled a ‘conspiracy theorist’ – as nonsensical as this ad hominem term is it has a very powerful effect on people.

I don’t really want to speculate beyond that but I think we should be aware that the military industrial complex are fully cognisant of the effect organised and popular resistance has on the war machine and therefore are likely to have attributed resources to limiting these efforts. We know from historical examples like the FBI COINTELPRO program in the Sixties that it happens.

What I find disappointing among the anti-war movement – regardless of the inability to connect the evidence of a staged pretext to legitimise the war and create public support for it – is the complete silence in respect of tax strikes, another form of civil disobedience. If a fraction of the millions who marched in London in 2003 knew that it was a viable strategy, and pro-peace organisations offered support and guidance then it would certainly go some way to bringing these wars that we are directly funding to a peaceful end.

911TN: What is one of the biggest challenges you’ve faced in trying to educate others about the 9/11 topic and how have you sought to overcome that challenge?

Gareth: The effect finding out about 9/11 had on my relationships with my friends and family was definitely a challenge. Initially I found talking about the issue a demoralising and mostly unsuccessful venture. Their rejection of the information hit me pretty hard but I knew I lacked a strong grasp of the subject matter. I undertook 3 months intensive study. It sounds so odd thinking about it now but it was only after the studying, upon venturing out to a 911 meeting in London, that I first met others that had come into the same information. That was just under 5 years ago. Now so many more people seem to be acquainted with the facts and the movement has evolved considerably. I guess the lesson I learned with my friends and family is that you can only do your best, give them d.v.ds, books, recommend the best websites etc and give them space and time to digest the information. Ultimately it’s their choice if they want to engage with the subject or not.

Something else I have found far less challenging but significant enough to mention is being a target of crude and unsubstantiated attacks. It seems that if you demonstrate a commitment to responsible promotion of the message, attempts will be made to discredit you and your work. But I take comfort from the fact that I’m by no means alone and that similar attacks are occurring again and again to people who have a long history of successful campaigning. I have come to accept that it’s just part of the terrain. If anything it’s a sign that you must be doing something right.

911TN: You’re not just a 9/11 justice activist. What are some of the other causes you work on and how does it fit in with 9/11?

Gareth: I was involved with the ‘Kew Bridge Eco Village’ – an experiment in sustainable community living and permaculture farming methods that existed from June 2009 until May the following year. Its original intention was to highlight the inequalities inherent in Britain’s land rights and provide a response to the converging economic, energy and ecological crises, inspiring real debate on real solutions. To a large extent it was very successful. Around 30-40 people of all ages and backgrounds were able to co-exist in relative harmony. We got a tremendous amount of mainstream media coverage, most of it fair and supportive.

We took our inspiration from the Native Americans and individuals like Gerard Winstanley who in the mid 1600′s, with fourteen other men took over and farmed vacant and common lands in England, producing food that was distributed evenly among those who participated and other needy peoples. Winstanley believed that the earth and its fruits were “a common treasury for all”. Further writings he distributed in the form of pamphlets expressed a worldview that envisioned a symbiotic relationship between humans and nature, acknowledging the inherent connections between people and their surroundings. He once declared that “true freedom lies where a man receives his nourishment and preservation, and that is in the use of the earth”. Similar writings and practices appear throughout history in indigenous communities predating western culture.

We found that what we were trying to achieve with the Kew Bridge Eco Village became contagious and other projects sprung up locally and in other parts of the UK. Towards the end we made significant steps in being completely self-sufficient but due to planning permission being granted for luxury apartments we were forcefully evicted from the land.

Some of us then decided to take our message to the centre of the political establishment in the UK, setting up a ‘Democracy Village’ in Parliament Square opposite the Houses of Parliament. Similar in ethos to the Kew Project we focused our attention on campaigning for an end to the war in Afghanistan. The result was a blitz of peaceful direct actions. Buildings were scaled (including our Houses of Parliament, twice!) and banners were hung. The actions took place throughout the area until, three months after it began, a High Court injunction was approved and we were again forcibly removed from the land.

Currently I’m involved in the early stages of a Transition Town project in my local area.

I think the link between these actions and 9/11 stem from a belief that war and international terrorism exist because of an over-reliance on fossils fuels. These fossil fuels appear to not only be running out but their use is having an alarming effect on our planet, potentially making it uninhabitable in the long-term.

The academic Nafeez Ahmed has made substantial efforts to understand these issues in his recent book A Users Guide to the Crisis of Civilisation: And How to Save it. In it he draws upon a wealth of scientific data to point out that these major crises affecting our planet are symptoms of one single ailing global system. I’m recommending it to everyone, not because my friend Dean Puckett is making a film inspired by the book, but because the information within it is genuinely important.

Our way of life is unsustainable. It doesn’t need to be.

911TN: What have you found to be the most effective method of educating others about 9/11?

Gareth: Generally I find people are receptive to the story of the victims’ families – The Jersey Girls, Bob Mcllvaine – and documented in the film 9/11: Press For Truth. The nature of their extraordinary fight to get an investigation to find out what happened to their loved ones is remarkably powerful and one which seems to make the subject matter more accessible and palatable for newcomers.

The works of Peter Dale Scott and Nafeez Ahmed are hugely useful in the detailing of the deeper historical and geopolitical context of 9/11. Their work seems to bring a very real understanding of not only how 9/11 happened but why.

The documentation supporting Anglo-American covert links to Al Qaeda as an actual asset furthering specific economic and strategic interests is pretty damning. There is just no room for dispute with that sort of information.

911TN: Where do we go from here?

Gareth: More outreach. More civil disobedience. More commitment to promoting responsible information. More alliances. More recognition of why 9/11 happened.

It’s time for the world to find out that the 9/11 Truth movement not only wants peace but is capable of helping achieve it.

Photos by Neil

Cosmos
- Homepage: http://911truthnews.com/

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

solidarity

07.02.2011 04:42

How about some old fashioned solidarity?! Astonishing to see people jumping to ridicule someone for spending 30 hours inside for their beliefs. Sure I disagree with the message of this protest but do we only support eachothers' voices if we specifically agree with their content? No one should have to spend 30 hours alone in a cell for standing in front of Downing Street with a small sign asking for the truth.

I've been in the Charing Cross nick myself, they held me for 23 hrs 45 mins and I only got a rug for the last hour (and a soggy one at that). I hope you're alright and staying strong.

graham


30 hours is a joke

07.02.2011 11:12

regardless of the issues raised, police appear to use the arrest and unnecessary detention of protesters as punishment and deterrent. they're a mob running a protection racket. there's no reason to detain a peaceful human that long. an inspector has to authorise detention every 6 hours.

this needs to be dealt with.
you may as well use freeman techniques as it's unlikely you'll get treated more harshly.
and will certainly give them something to think about.
eg. dont answer their questions, ask some of your own.
put them on their oath
"i'm putting you on your oath, under God, so help me God, NOW we have a contract."
conditionally accept their offers of service, you can set the conditions.
eg.payment of fee OR they do a cartwheel OR stand on their head.
pre-serve notices on the police regarding your past and future treatment.
ask them to submit your [pre-prepared]application form before you can help them.
if arrested, continue the questionning and not answering/non-compliance, conditional acceptance. you can have them in stitches if you use humour. let's face it, if you remove the emotion, objectively it's a pretty humourous situation. i'd rather be arrested here than most other places on earth. at least you're likely to get out within 48 hours without being hurt too much.

imagine, if you will, a filmed stunt where 10 or more ppl line up near downing st [not protesting]
then one woman[or man] moves to protest. when approached, everyone move forward whilst only one spokesman calmy uses freeman techniques to put the constable in his place. [ie. a public servant who's primary role is to keep the peace.] the rest try not to respond to questionning.
if arrested the protest would continue until all are arrested. the protest would then move to the police station[s] concerned.

10 ppl doing this would cause problems. i was told by an inspector that if 100 ppl did something like this it would cause big problems for the met.

peace


well done

07.02.2011 13:24

your actions raise the concious levels of an otherwise zombie nation, thousands of people died for very wrong reasons and the crooks that orchestrated this are still doin their dirty work

the truth will out!

love and respect gareth!

pixies


Just the facts.

07.02.2011 13:54

Given the recent proper peer review of Harrit's paper on nanothermite, and the impossibility of it being conventional bombs used on 911 begs the question: why do you beleive this?

 http://climateguy.blogspot.com/2010/11/peer-review-of-harrit-et-al-on-911-cant.html

naNO.


I Love It!

08.02.2011 00:03

There's nothing more courageous than standing up for what you believe in, even in the face of tyranny! These governments all over the world are way out of control, and it's time for the people to reign them back in...time for a fresh start! 9/11 was not carried out by the individuals who the corrupt media tries to say it was, and it's in everyone's best interest to look for the information yourself, so you too can realize why people are serious about getting the info out to others! It really is that important! Take the time to do the right thing, for a change! Viva 9/11 Truth! Power to the people!

celebs4truth
mail e-mail: phelpsjeffrey@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://www.celebs4truth.com


More links!

09.02.2011 11:31

David Rovics on 9/11 Truth:

 http://songwritersnotebook.blogspot.com/2008/03/911-truth-movement-vs-911-truth.html


George Monbiot on 9/11 Truth:

 http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2007/02/12/short-changed/

and

 http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2007/02/20/bayoneting-a-scarecrow/


Schnews on 9/11 truth:

 http://www.schnews.org.uk/archive/news559.htm


Other lefties caught red handed working for the lizards include: Noam Chomsky, Democracy Now, Counterpunch, Tony Benn, New York Indymedia, London Indymedia, The Stop the War Coalition, EVERY major left party in the UK and Europe, EVERY major anarchist group in the UK and Europe and of course all those islamist groups who celebrate the events of 9/11 as a great victory.

Thank god that sane and courageous voices like Charlie Sheen are there to set the record straight…..

G.


In support of 9/11 scepticism

22.08.2011 23:05

People on the radical left would do well to investigate the evidence and issues surrounding 9/11, as it impacts directly on virtually every issue in the modern world, especially media control and bias, censorship, civil liberties and geo-politics.

It is not sufficient to bury one's head in the sand and say that the matter is settled, although in a way, it is: there's no doubt that 9/11 was a false flag attack - the evidence is utterly overwhelming and comes from a myriad sources, including over 100 eye witnesses, dozens of whistleblowers and over 1,500 expert opinions. Read Niels Harrit's (peer reviewed) paper on the forensic analysis of dust samples taken from Manhattan on 9/11:

 http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm

The cited critique by Climate Guy should also be noted (posted by Just the facts):

 http://climateguy.blogspot.com/2010/11/peer-review-of-harrit-et-al-on-911-cant.html

The fact that Climate Guy is a climate change denier should not put you off, although it does give me pause for thought. You should also read the last few comments under his article, as they do throw considerable doubt on his argument (to say the least), in my opinion.

But I'm not a chemist. I have a degree in Physics, along with a PhD in Engineering Mathematics. It is completely clear to me that WTC7 (the third tower to collapse on 9/11) could not have collapsed due to fire (and some superficial structural damage). Even NIST was eventually forced to concede that the first 2.5 seconds of the collapse proceeded at freefall acceleration. This is not even remotely possible for a steel-framed high-rise structure of that type, without severing nearly all the core columns virtually simultaneously, using explosives (and possibly incendiaries). It's as simple as that. There is no credible counter-argument.

The fact that media organisations are not prepared to take these arguments seriously should be no surprise. Liberal lefty commentators like Chomsky and Monbiot have completely ignored the evidence and refuse to engage with it - their ignorance is painfully obvious. They are afraid for their reputations. No one wants to say the Emperor has no clothes on; they'll not be thanked for it. It is largely left to scientists and engineers to plough a thankless furrow. But the truth will out, eventually. Yesterday's 'conspiracy theory' is today's declassified history (see: Operation Gladio, Walsall Anarchists (1892), etc etc etc ...).

Chris W
mail e-mail: chris.whitrow@gmail.com
- Homepage: Croydon


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech