Baldyman must have had to think extra hard about his new ‘radical’ proposals for people on Jobseekers Allowance, aka the dole. It seems that he thought all the way back to 1997 when new Labour launched the New Deal (1), which including mandatory 30 hour a week activity for the long term unemployed.
Whilst IDS is promising 4 weeks hard labour, New Labour splashed out over $6 billion on job creation schemes like the Environmental Task Force and subsidised wage slavery. It was eventually scrapped because it was shit. It was replaced last year by the all new Flexible New Deal, which is also now likely to be scrapped, because it’s shit.
What Iain Duncan Smith’s new scheme is likely to be called is still up in the air as are the finer details, however we can reveal exclusively on the void that it will be shit.
The first New Deal led to people sitting around in offices for 30 hours a week (2) because work placements couldn’t be found for them. It did however make a lot of people rich on the back of the poor. Meanwhile those noble Brits who were actively avoiding employment, estimated by the DWP at only around 100,000 people, blagged, scammed and skived their way through just like they have with every other piece of shit the state has foisted on them. And just like they will again.
For the other million or so on the dole, well it fucked up people’s college courses, led to depression and even abuse by private training providers (3) and wasted a lot of people’s time. One thing it didn’t do was lead to a significant number of people finding work.
Ever keen to outdo New Labour scum though, this is likely to be more shit than anything so far. The original New Deal included a training option, which although predictably shit, did provide some basic skills provision or English Language tuition for the handful who managed to blag themselves onto one of the courses.
This is the essential difference between New Labour and the current shower of scum. New Labour ground your face in the dirt if you were poor supposedly for your own good, Baldyman and his rich chums just like kicking the poor. It makes them feel better about the size of their electoral mandate.
The most truly brutal aspect of this policy is not just the unemployed who are likely to humiliated and exploited on enforced community service. That’s not good enough for the Bullingdon boys. It is the sick who will bear the brunt of this scheme.
One of the tories latest radical plans for welfare include testing everyone currently claiming Employment Support Allowance (aka the sick) with the intention of moving up to a million people onto Job Seekers Allowance. ESA is paid to those, who up until recently, had been declared by their doctors as too ill to work. However GPs, who will soon be running the NHS, are no longer considered to be clever enough to make that kind of decision and it is now left to private company Atos Origin’s computer (4).
Atos Origin are an IT company who have been paid billions to come up with a test that shows most people on benefits are skiving. These tests have been widely slated and not just by us. The Citizen’s Advice Bureau and Macmillan Cancer Support (5) are amongst some of the dangerous radicals who have condemned these tests which have led to people with serious conditions, including potentially terminal illnesses, being declared fit for work.
This declaration not only leads to a benefit cut from around £95 to £65 a week, but also means that they will become eligible for the new forced labour scheme. If they don’t find a job quick enough they will also be forced to pay anything up to twenty five quid a week of their rent due to the 10% Housing Benefit cut for people on the dole for a year. As we have warned, after essentials such as water and fuel this could leave people with a pound or two a day to live on.
So there you have it. The kick in the tail. Whilst all Baldyman plans for the unemployed is the same old deal, they will now be joined by the sick and disabled as they clean the streets and dredge canals.
That’s cancer patients, forced to do physical work and not being given enough money for food. Welcome to Hell.
(1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal_(United_Kingdom)
(2) http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/poverty-pimps-march-on-a4e-close-local-law-centre/
(3) http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/a4e-more-from-the-poverty-pimps/
(4) http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/atos-origin-dont-give-a-toss-for-the-sick/
(5) http://www.socialequality.org.uk/~sepuk/content/new-benefit-system-britain-forces-sick-and-disabled-work
(6) http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/wont-pay-wont-leave-the-real-cost-of-those-housing-benefit-reforms/
facebook group: benefit claimants fight back
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=116432071735566
What Iain Duncan Smith’s new scheme is likely to be called is still up in the air as are the finer details, however we can reveal exclusively on the void that it will be shit.
The first New Deal led to people sitting around in offices for 30 hours a week (2) because work placements couldn’t be found for them. It did however make a lot of people rich on the back of the poor. Meanwhile those noble Brits who were actively avoiding employment, estimated by the DWP at only around 100,000 people, blagged, scammed and skived their way through just like they have with every other piece of shit the state has foisted on them. And just like they will again.
For the other million or so on the dole, well it fucked up people’s college courses, led to depression and even abuse by private training providers (3) and wasted a lot of people’s time. One thing it didn’t do was lead to a significant number of people finding work.
Ever keen to outdo New Labour scum though, this is likely to be more shit than anything so far. The original New Deal included a training option, which although predictably shit, did provide some basic skills provision or English Language tuition for the handful who managed to blag themselves onto one of the courses.
This is the essential difference between New Labour and the current shower of scum. New Labour ground your face in the dirt if you were poor supposedly for your own good, Baldyman and his rich chums just like kicking the poor. It makes them feel better about the size of their electoral mandate.
The most truly brutal aspect of this policy is not just the unemployed who are likely to humiliated and exploited on enforced community service. That’s not good enough for the Bullingdon boys. It is the sick who will bear the brunt of this scheme.
One of the tories latest radical plans for welfare include testing everyone currently claiming Employment Support Allowance (aka the sick) with the intention of moving up to a million people onto Job Seekers Allowance. ESA is paid to those, who up until recently, had been declared by their doctors as too ill to work. However GPs, who will soon be running the NHS, are no longer considered to be clever enough to make that kind of decision and it is now left to private company Atos Origin’s computer (4).
Atos Origin are an IT company who have been paid billions to come up with a test that shows most people on benefits are skiving. These tests have been widely slated and not just by us. The Citizen’s Advice Bureau and Macmillan Cancer Support (5) are amongst some of the dangerous radicals who have condemned these tests which have led to people with serious conditions, including potentially terminal illnesses, being declared fit for work.
This declaration not only leads to a benefit cut from around £95 to £65 a week, but also means that they will become eligible for the new forced labour scheme. If they don’t find a job quick enough they will also be forced to pay anything up to twenty five quid a week of their rent due to the 10% Housing Benefit cut for people on the dole for a year. As we have warned, after essentials such as water and fuel this could leave people with a pound or two a day to live on.
So there you have it. The kick in the tail. Whilst all Baldyman plans for the unemployed is the same old deal, they will now be joined by the sick and disabled as they clean the streets and dredge canals.
That’s cancer patients, forced to do physical work and not being given enough money for food. Welcome to Hell.
(1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal_(United_Kingdom) (2)
http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/poverty-pimps-march-on-a4e-close-local-law-centre/ (3)
http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/a4e-more-from-the-poverty-pimps/ (4)
http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/atos-origin-dont-give-a-toss-for-the-sick/ (5)
http://www.socialequality.org.uk/~sepuk/content/new-benefit-system-britain-forces-sick-and-disabled-work (6)
http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/wont-pay-wont-leave-the-real-cost-of-those-housing-benefit-reforms/ facebook group: benefit claimants fight back
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=116432071735566
Homepage:
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
There is a silver lining
07.11.2010 20:10
I think that is a completely different problem - but, you are right, it does need looking at.
As to "hard labour". Its only 30 hours a week for 4 weeks !!
Schoolkids work more than that. 6 Hours a day, hardly hard work. Try 12
Lastly, there are many community things that need doing. For instance, they roads around where I live are peppered with potholes (even before the trouble of last winter). There is also the aspect of pollution from cow manure in coastal regions where the runoff in the sea is causing huge impacts on wildlife. Less potholes = less pollution and less cowpats would be less pollution. Those are just two examples of jobs that need doing that will help society and the environment.
The long term unemployed represent a huge pool of untapped talent that could be put to good use in return for their welfare (the sick aside).
Franko
But not through forced labour, Franko
08.11.2010 10:41
Annie Citizen
in a sense all labour is forced...
08.11.2010 17:13
You don't have to do this work, it's just you won't get your benefits if you don't.
Similarly with a regular job, you don't have to do it, but you won't get paid if you don't.
I predict this will be just an expensive PR exercise to keep Daily Mail readers happy, with little real effect on doleys. It's just too much hassle and too costly to harass people who don't really want to work. Much cheaper to keep them on the dole. They bring these schemes out every year and they always fizzle out.
This is basically aimed at people suspected of working cash in hand on the side and people being obvious about not wanting to work. Possibly political activists too. But if you are clever and subtle enough about it, you should have no problems. You could also use your work placement for sabotage.
anon
law of nature
08.11.2010 23:25
I think the plan is to do community work anyway. If people want some FREE MONEY then they got to be prepared to give some of their time to get it. Theres no such thing as a free lunch.
That is social fairness. Why should worker's work, and the unemployed just exploit people's goodwill? Fuck that.
>> You don't have to do this work, it's just you won't get your benefits if you don't.
>> Similarly with a regular job, you don't have to do it, but you won't get paid if you don't.
Absolutely. In the same way that an African tribesman doesn't have to go hunting and gathering if he didn't want to. But he does because he needs to.
People need food and shelter, therefore they need to work. This can range from growing your own, or contracting your time out to earn money so you can buy food.
It DOES NOT include, begging or just waiting for the weekly handout by some sort of right.
Benefits are a temporary thing to get people on their feet. Its not designed as a way of life.
You want to eat?... do something to make food appear.
Franko