Why Blair is hated

Please can people use this site in the way that it was intended - to allow a platform for those who are denied access to the mainstream media, together with promoting events and activities that would otherwise go unnoticed. What it doesn't need is alienated individuals who've spent the last 5 hours in the pub, got involved in an argument with their friends, and are looking for a way to continue their discussion, posting already well-rehearsed positions to make themselves feel more important.

Now why do you think that is?

You think IMC Liverpool is for people who can't access mainstream media? Liverpool isn't some developing nation.

The challenge for IMC's in media rich environments like Liverpool is to present a viable alternative that can move faster than the mainstream, is less bogged down in censorship, and can provide eyewitness accounts where the mainstream media can't.

x

Some other parts of the country think Liverpool IS like a developing nation! ;-D

Probably similar to the nobheads who still view Liverpool, Manchester and the rest of the North like some developing/3rd world country. More fool them :)

U.S. Judge Jackson who chaired the Nuremburg Trials wrote into international law that the planning and doing of aggressive wars is the supreme international crime on the planet earth, as it actuates all other crimes high, low, big, and small. He further states that it is the supreme crime on earth whether Germany does it or the U.S.A. does it.

That is the actual international law from the anti-fascist side that Blair and Bush violated. Note it is the worst international crime possible on the planet. Bush Blair lied one million died. The law is for the anti-fascist side yet the Imperialist camp which controls the security council, and is the tiny minority in the world, has by veto taken away the full and written raison-d'- etre of the United Nations Charter which says that the anti-fascist side sets the goal of liberation of the planet to be ending aggressive wars as any nations foreign policy. It says that in this way, the United Nations Charter intends to make aggressive war just a long distant memory for the comming generations.

The new way forward to be collective agree as democracy for settling disputes between nations. It seems now that the Imperialist controlled security council in a vote of 10-5 has launched another war of aggression ( Libya ) completely against the cause of its own Charter, and in veto mode against the General Assembly the majority, who are completely opposed to aggressive war as any nations foreign policy as settling disputes between nations. Viva socialist liberation. End pollution wars, not endless wars for more pollution.