9/11, The New Evidence discussed with former 'Leveller' Journalist Ian Henshall

Ian Hensall is one of the foremost UK researchers into the 9/11 attacks. He is also the publisher of Crisis Newletter, www.dumpblair.co.uk and www.911dossier.co.uk
911 The New Evidence by Ian Henshall

"in the 6 years since the tragic events" - that means thas the source of this cut and paste is 3 years old - hardly news is it.

You do know hat Bush is no longer president do you?
Thank god this conspira-bollocks is getting rarer.

.

Some science then...

Last year 9 members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice had a peer-reviewed paper 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe' published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal. According to one of the scientists involved Professor Steven E Jones "in short, the paper explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings." It can be read at  http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM.

In 2008, several of these authors published three articles challenging the official reports in US scientific journals, The Open Civil Engineering Journal  http://bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM, The Environmentalist  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4, and The Journal of Engineering Mechanics  http://ascelibrary.aip.org/dbt/dbt.jsp?KEY=JENMDT&Volume=134&Issue=10#DISCUSSIONS%20AND%20CLOSURES. Dozens of other papers making similar challenges have been published in the sister publication of the Scholars group, The Journal of 9/11 Studies  http://journalof911studies.com

See also:

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
 http://ae911truth.org

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
 http://stj911.com

60 Aerospace Engineers call for a new investigation.
 http://world911truth.org/60-aerospace-engineers-call-for-a-new-911-investigation

So Bush blew up the towers? Good. A few more dead bankers. Hopefully he'll come over here and sort out Cannary Wharf.

The US portrays itself as indestructible and in a sense ruler of the world. Although many people outwardly do not like this perception, inwardly it does provide people with a sense of comfort and stability. Maybe a central point by which to measure what goes on around them and the rest of the world. What happened during the 9/11 attacks showed people that there is no such thing as "indestructible". People all around the world felt vulnerable (love or hate the US) the all powerful superstate showed it too has weakness.

So how does this relate to conspiracy theory?

Cognitive dissonance. Something so terrible happens that you cannot accept the outcome. If your world is so shaken you will look for evidence to disprove reality. Basically in terms of 9/11, evidence that the US self-flagellated. From the point of view of the 9/11 conspiracy theorist, it is far better flagellation occurred, rather than a country as powerful as the US be severely wounded by a small group of highly skilled foreigners.

So does this mean all conspiracy is nonsense?

No, not at all. History has proven many underhanded deeds have taken place. History too will finally prove whether 9/11 was an inside job.

A good example of misplaced conspiracy goes back to the great fire of London. In this instance foreigners were blamed for starting the fire. And indeed, so strong was the public outcry against foreigners that one man was executed and blamed for starting the fire. For many hundreds of years there was a plaque attached to the monument [of the fire] condemning foreign people for burning down London. Only recent history accepts the fire was caused by a careless baker.