Dan Amos 
http://myspace.com/supportdan
Greg, Natasha & Heather http://myspace.com/shacukprisonersupport
Sarah Whitehead http://myspace.com/supportsarah
Heather Nicholson jailed for 11 years; Gregg and Natasha Avery sentenced to nine years each; Gavin Medd-Hall an eight-year prison sentence Daniel Wadham jailed for five years Gerrah Selby and Dan Amos were both sentenced to four years in prison.
http://myspace.com/supportdan Greg, Natasha & Heather
http://myspace.com/shacukprisonersupport Sarah Whitehead
http://myspace.com/supportsarah Heather Nicholson jailed for 11 years; Gregg and Natasha Avery sentenced to nine years each; Gavin Medd-Hall an eight-year prison sentence Daniel Wadham jailed for five years Gerrah Selby and Dan Amos were both sentenced to four years in prison.
Comments
Hide the following 16 comments
A more specific way.....
24.06.2009 07:50
Heather Nicholson - 11 years
Gregg Avery - 9 years
Natasha Avery- 9 years
Gavin Medd-Hall - 8 years
Dan Wadham - 5 years
Dan Amos - 4 years
Gerrah Selby - 4 years
We want something positive to come out of this situation. We are certainly not going to sit back and moan about how terrible it is. We're going to carry on fighting to save lives as we always have done. All the time we are in prison we will be raising money to help animals. It doesn't matter how much or how little you give because if we all pull together we can make a huge difference.
Please be a part of this and put a huge smile on our faces and, most importantly, make all the difference to animals in need. We will write to tell you how YOUR money is spent on individual animals or equipment and projects.
All that you need to do is to send your donation by cheque or postal order payable to 'Greek Animal Rescue' and send it to: Greek Animal Rescue (G.A.R), 980 Great West Rd, Brentford, TW8 9GS . Please mark the envelope: 'S.A.Y. Appeal'
You can sponsor the whole 50 years of all the prisoners' sentences at 10p a year for example. That would be £5.00. Alternatively, you could just sponsor one of the SHAC prisoners. You could choose, for example, Dan Amos at £10 per year = £40. Do let your prisoner know that you have sponsored him or her! Please look at the prisoner support page for their addresses.
Thanks again for all your support.
Love, UK SHAC7 Prisoners - Natasha, Heather, Gregg, Dan A, Dan W, Gavin and Gerrah x
UK SHAC7
Huge relief...
24.06.2009 09:05
Puppy
free the Shac 7
24.06.2009 09:26
Get lost 'puppy', these arrests won't stop the Animal Liberation movement, your pathetic smear squeeks only make us aware we're on the right track in our fight against the brutal system of exploitation that pays your wages and keeps millions of animals behind bars.
bad news for nectu puppy
Just accept it
24.06.2009 09:54
Another puppy
If only !
24.06.2009 10:05
One
How...
24.06.2009 10:32
Where are the neighbours who had their cars trashed or windows put through? Oh yes of course, there aren't any. Just sounds good for your little PR machine to say that "neighbours were targeted".
As for family being targeted - John Varley's daughter got her car trashed this year - AFTER the SHAC prisoners were sent down. Methinks it may not have been them... Back to the drawing board ey NETCU!
The fact you think receiving a smear letter about your neighbour is being targets just shows how pathetic NETCU are - must be why you always hide at the back when it kicks off on demo's! The footage of Steve at the EDO demo is hilarious - hiding behind his colleagues while everyone storms the site, then once the police have a bit more control he comes out to the front waving his baton! Like a little kid hiding behind the sofa. What a chump.
How?
To Puppy - anmal abuse =child abuse
24.06.2009 12:14
"There is increasing research and clinical evidence which suggests that there are sometimes inter-relationships, commonly referred to as 'links', between the abuse of children, vulnerable adults and animals. A better understanding of these links can help to protect victims, both human and animal, and promote their welfare."
From:
NSPCC
To 'How'
24.06.2009 12:23
No, at first they did assume that they were genuinely being warned of a paedophile loose in the area.They they realised that they were being expoited by a third party for their own ends. As a result, they too were targeted and victims of the blackmail plot carried out by SHAC.
It really isn't that difficult.
Corky the Cat
To NSPCC
24.06.2009 13:23
The fact that you choose to miss this or that you cannot discern the difference neatly illustrates the issues common to all AR extremists.
Not NSPCC
ACPO
24.06.2009 16:31
Steve Discombe
To Not NSPCC
24.06.2009 17:54
As to not mentioning vivisection once again proves you have not read the report. Page 4 of the report states "Three categories of animal abuse are:
1 Physical abuse: includes kicking, punching, throwing, burning, microwaving,
drowning, asphyxiation, and the administration of drugs or poisons."
Workers at HLS and Covance have been shown on video punching and throwing animals. And as for "... the administration of drugs and poisons." I'll leave that for the reader to make their mind up.
Please read reports before commenting on them.
Typical of pro-vivisection.
NSPCC
Try reading it again..slowly
25.06.2009 07:30
I wonder if another study should be conducted into the effect on written comprehension?
Matt Clowes
To Matt
25.06.2009 07:54
Also it does not say anything about "illness" only abuse, which just shows you haven't read the report. As for claiming animal sanctuaries hoard animals what a silly person you are. Just shows how the pro-vivisection people are actually not bothered about scientific findings they are just idiots and often thugs (might makes right huh). Still while you are posting nonsence here you aren't abusing your animals/partner/kids.
So to all the NETCU/NPOIU/Random other coppers here how does it feel knowing that the people you protect are far more likely to go home and abuse their partners and kids?
Mathiilda
Interesting NSPCC article
25.06.2009 08:02
I found it disgusting that people who were pro-animal tests are not only ignoring the report but actually making thing up and pretending they are in the reports. The report is there for everyone to see and yet the pro-animal tests posts on this thread are trying to make people think that it says something about hoarding animals when itsays nothing of the sort. It makes me wonder what other supposed facts these pro-animal test people make up when it comes to animal tests.
I'm disgusted that these people ignore a paper published by a well respected organisation such as the NSPCC with a lot of support from other well respected organisations.
Are the people on these threads people who work in animal testing labs or police? Either way they should take a long hard look at themselves.
This thread (especially the lies from the pro-animal testing side) has made me think again about my stance on vivisection. Can someone point me at good websites I can get a more informed view on vivisection?
Thank you
Unbiased Observer
@ Unbiased Observer
25.06.2009 14:08
ARA
Re: Try reading it again slowly
03.07.2009 17:12
Matt Clowes