Teaching the High Court Australia, the Rule of Law and basic Human Rights: when is Ignorance NOT an excuse?
The article demonstrates the stranglehold lawyers have on the media. We make Judges out of these people! No wonder the country is in a mess. Lawyers refuse to accept HREOA1986 as law, because it makes their monopoly profession, an illegal one, and without discrimination, anyone can be a lawyer/advocate.
Combine it with our Notice of a Constitutional Matter, Writ of Mandamus, Lets see if we cant celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the year that Australians get confirmation of their already passed and underused Bill of Rights
The article demonstrates the stranglehold lawyers have on the media. We make Judges out of these people! No wonder the country is in a mess. Lawyers refuse to accept HREOA1986 as law, because it makes their monopoly profession, an illegal one, and without discrimination, anyone can be a lawyer/advocate.
Combine it with our Notice of a Constitutional Matter, Writ of Mandamus, Lets see if we cant celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the year that Australians get confirmation of their already passed and underused Bill of Rights
On December the 9th 2008, the Sydney Morning Herald published the latest in about twenty two years of lawyer generated propaganda, against the Australian Bill of Rights. This is misleading and deceptive conduct, and the Newspaper should should be taken to the Federal Court of Australia, and fined heavily. Helen Irving is Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Sydney.
Teaching the High Court Australia, basic Human Rights: when is Ignorance NOT an excuse?
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), was enacted as a Federal Law, by the Labor Party with Liberal Party support as Schedule 2 to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 . Reading and understanding a Statute:
· The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 is a Statute.
· The Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is a Statute.
· The Judiciary Act 1903 is a Statute.
· The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 is a Statute.
· The Trade Practices Act 1974 is a Statute.
· The Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) is a Statute
· The Privacy Act 1988 is a Statute
· The Evidence Act 1995, (Cth) is a Stautue.
Multiple Federal Court Judges and High Court Judges, including the Chief Justice of Robert Stenton French, have now called HREOA1986 as a general rule, or dismissed it outright, as an act of treason against the Australian people.
The First Statute on the list has two Supremacy Clauses:
S 5 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 makes every Federal Law supreme and
S 109 makes them prevail,over all State Enactments.
The second says a Schedule is part of an Act ( Statute).
The Third says that the common law shall prevail, in S 80 Judiciary Act 1903.
The Fourth makes it a common law crime to disobey a Statute, by misleading and deceiving the good people of Australia, are criminals,
The Fifth refers to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights not just in its Dictionary, but in three offences in Schedule Section 3.
The Fourth specifically implements the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
In the fifth, in Section 138 (3) (f) Evidence Act 1995, (Cth) , are told where to find the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The article demonstrates the stranglehold lawyers have on the media. We make Judges out of these people! No wonder the country is in a mess. Lawyers refuse to accept it as law, because it makes their monopoly profession, an illegal one, and without discrimination, anyone can be a lawyer/advocate.
Combine it with our Notice of a Constitutional Matter, Writ of Mandamus, Lets see if we cant celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the year that Australians get confirmation of their already passed and underused Bill of Rights
http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com
http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=11345
Invalid Australian Constitution empowers crooked (High Court) Judges to violate Common Law rights for ALL Australians
http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=10581
Death of Mandamus: French, Hayne, Gummow, Crennan JJ protecting and coverup conspiracy to pervert justice
http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=11130
Teaching the High Court Australia, basic Human Rights: when is Ignorance NOT an excuse?
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), was enacted as a Federal Law, by the Labor Party with Liberal Party support as Schedule 2 to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 . Reading and understanding a Statute:
· The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 is a Statute.
· The Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is a Statute.
· The Judiciary Act 1903 is a Statute.
· The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 is a Statute.
· The Trade Practices Act 1974 is a Statute.
· The Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) is a Statute
· The Privacy Act 1988 is a Statute
· The Evidence Act 1995, (Cth) is a Stautue.
Multiple Federal Court Judges and High Court Judges, including the Chief Justice of Robert Stenton French, have now called HREOA1986 as a general rule, or dismissed it outright, as an act of treason against the Australian people.
The First Statute on the list has two Supremacy Clauses:
S 5 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 makes every Federal Law supreme and
S 109 makes them prevail,over all State Enactments.
The second says a Schedule is part of an Act ( Statute).
The Third says that the common law shall prevail, in S 80 Judiciary Act 1903.
The Fourth makes it a common law crime to disobey a Statute, by misleading and deceiving the good people of Australia, are criminals,
The Fifth refers to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights not just in its Dictionary, but in three offences in Schedule Section 3.
The Fourth specifically implements the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
In the fifth, in Section 138 (3) (f) Evidence Act 1995, (Cth) , are told where to find the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The article demonstrates the stranglehold lawyers have on the media. We make Judges out of these people! No wonder the country is in a mess. Lawyers refuse to accept it as law, because it makes their monopoly profession, an illegal one, and without discrimination, anyone can be a lawyer/advocate.
Combine it with our Notice of a Constitutional Matter, Writ of Mandamus, Lets see if we cant celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the year that Australians get confirmation of their already passed and underused Bill of Rights
http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=11345 Invalid Australian Constitution empowers crooked (High Court) Judges to violate Common Law rights for ALL Australians
http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=10581 Death of Mandamus: French, Hayne, Gummow, Crennan JJ protecting and coverup conspiracy to pervert justice
http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=11130
e-mail:
Homepage:
