Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Culture Secretary: "There is content that should just not be available"

Chris | 27.12.2008 14:16 | Other Press | Technology | Sheffield | World

Some extracts from an article from todays Torygraph follow...

Internet sites could be given cinema-style age ratings as part of a Government crackdown on offensive and harmful online activity to be launched in the New Year, the Culture Secretary says.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Andy Burnham says he believes that new standards of decency need to be applied to the web. He is planning to negotiate with Barack Obama’s incoming American administration to draw up new international rules for English language websites.

Mr Burnham said: “If you look back at the people who created the internet they talked very deliberately about creating a space that Governments couldn’t reach. I think we are having to revisit that stuff seriously now. It’s true across the board in terms of content, harmful content, and copyright. Libel is [also] an emerging issue.

“There is content that should just not be available to be viewed. That is my view. Absolutely categorical. This is not a campaign against free speech, far from it; it is simply there is a wider public interest at stake when it involves harm to other people. We have got to get better at defining where the public interest lies and being clear about it.”

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Your ISP is already logging all your web activity, this is going to result in a big growth of anti-censorship, pro-privacy VPN services such as offered by companies such as these:

 http://www.securenetics.com/
 http://strongvpn.com/
 http://www.torrentfreedom.com/

And clearly a service like this for activists is needed...

Chris
- Homepage: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/3965051/Internet-sites-could-be-given-cinema-style-age-ratings-Culture-Secretary-says.

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Libel?

27.12.2008 14:48

In totally unrelated news, a convicted fraudster and donor to Obama's campaign by the name of Mr Auchi is purging the web of 'libellous' stories about him being a convicted fraudster, which he is, or anything else with information about him.

Innocent Dave


correct link to article

27.12.2008 16:26

logged


THAT will get nowhere

27.12.2008 16:30

"He is planning to negotiate with Barack Obama’s incoming American administration to draw up new international rules for English language websites."

Our traditions about both "free speech" and "libel*" are so different from yours that any such negotiations have zero chance of getting anywhere. No American adminstration of any political stripe would go along with your concepts. People here wouldn't stand for it.


* The divergergence on this began shortly BEFORE the Revolution. I can't remember which Massachusets Adams was the lawyer in the famous case who successfully presented the novel (for the time) defense that "truth" was a defense and that it was for the prosecuting side to prove "wilfull falsehood or in reckless disregard of truth" and not for the defending side to prove true.

MDN
mail e-mail: stepbyspefarm mtdata.com


Editorial Guidelines?

27.12.2008 19:32

Isn't posting reports from the corporate media against the Editorial Guidelines?

Err


this may be better for activisits

28.12.2008 09:35

burntout


The wider pubic interest is not being served

29.12.2008 04:11

"This is not a campaign against free speech, far from it; it is simply there is a wider public interest at stake when it involves harm to other people."

The wider public interest is in determining what harm is caused by being coerced into no access to speech. The harm to a corrupt politician or a mendacious managing director is surely something that can be tolerated. The harm caused by a media so cowed and tamed by repressive legislation is not.

There are libel laws for those wanton enough to publish libel on the internet. There are pornography laws for those who publish obscene material. There is, in fact, no need for new legislation. There might well be a need for free, universal, access to legal advice and representation for individuals who are being systematically harmed by the management and manipulation of the media.

The wider public interest of reducing harm to people is best served by allowing anything to be published on the net. Redwatch and Stormfront - vicious though they are - do nothing but advertise who would do harm and to whom and why. To push that from public visibility does not reduce the harm but simply satisfies the authoritarian urges of simplistic solutions.

disgusted of ealing


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech