derby water treatment plant raynesway derby plan windsails to add to methane powered genetators nr rolls royce nuclear plant derby
on friday a rep from severn trent water .came to my home as it ajoins thier treatment works .which has for sometime been burning waste from sewers /these have no doubt cut the smell and flies down ..whether any harm is done to enviroment im not sure ,but it must be better than diesel burners .it comes uot the sewers the methane ./david wood the rep asked if id object to windsails and some slight noise .i told him it was a good idea better than nuclear powered plants .this being oposite rolls royce nuclear plant .is a bonus ,.he also mentioned hydro power on the rivers /which is a step in the right direction i explained to him what was dangerous on either side .celanese chemicals they use acate use benzene and much more ,the other side rolls roycs nuclear plant uranium ect used for trident missiles demo 7 am tuesday .on raynesway .and next door b.o.c gases all in flood plains.spondon near by has the worst leukemia rate in uk .through these plants . so is severn trent setting an example .will there be problems anyone can think of let me know ill discuss the issues with them .they have a link on..www.stwater.co.uk enviroment-renewable energy or ring st.on01332683445 direct 01332683377 david wood mobile 07789903782 . anyone with knowledge of this id appreciate knowing pete
e-mail:
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
What is this article all about?
20.10.2008 12:20
uh?
Sounds interesting please put web links on this up, your sentences
20.10.2008 17:50
If they really are going for it & its not greenwash, thats great, proof would be brilliant.
Severn Trent on the other hand use flouride in many areas. including nottingham. There was a scientific consensus a moderate amount of flouride addition to water is necessary as it does prevent decay & our teeth in their natural state need it. But the safety of application via water supply has increasingly been challenged recently with scientific data.
In the United Kingdom the Green Party& many protest groups refer to fluoride as a poison, claiming that water fluoridation violates Article 35 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, is banned by the UK poisons act of 1972, violates Articles 3 and 8 of the Human Rights Act and raises issues under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.[8]
* There are other ways of delivering fluoride besides the water supply;
* Fluoride does not need to be swallowed to prevent tooth decay;
* Tooth decay has dropped at the same rate in countries with, and without, water fluoridation;
* People are now receiving fluoride from many other sources besides the water supply;
* Studies indicate fluoride’s potential to cause a wide range of adverse, systemic effects;
* Since fluoridation affects so many people, “one might accept a lower level of proof before taking preventive actions.”[11]
Dr