Indymedia has clear editorial guidelines and you can only hide a post under such circumstances, please can readers read the post under the following url and say which guidelines have been breached by the post exposing the hypocrisy of George Galloway and the SWP who are responsible for continuing the Labour oppression in the East End which they see as ripe for exploitation. here is the url 
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/10/410207.html
this time, the infiltrator gives no reason contrary to imc post guidelines. this person keeps trying to hide the posts since who is sim1 and what is imcuk editorial policy being used to hide ok posts?
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/10/410207.html this time, the infiltrator gives no reason contrary to imc post guidelines. this person keeps trying to hide the posts since who is sim1 and what is imcuk editorial policy being used to hide ok posts?
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Don't be an arse
08.10.2008 16:36
CH
It's the way of the world
08.10.2008 16:36
There used to be a group that had something to do with Bristol university and Bristol Indymedia that had a website that listed all the hidden and deleted stuff as well as the edits that are carried out by the moderators but that closed a year or so back.
Most of the time you just have to live with it.
Former IMC collective worker
i am happy with censorship according to the guidelines but this is not..
08.10.2008 17:14
whycensorwithoutreason
asking why a post not breaching guideline is hidden is not arsy - it is vital
08.10.2008 17:19
Furthermore, the post is not discriminatory or inaccurate in any way. Importantly, the issue raised is reflective of people's concerns and yet it is being censored arbitrarily. if this is what imc-uk is doing now, this debate should be on the website for all readers...
whycensorwithoutreason
Missing the point
08.10.2008 17:42
CH
no allegations but supported sourced referring to galloway is your objection
08.10.2008 19:13
So exactly what allegation do you refer to and again what is the reason for hiding the post as it seems you have the same philosophy as Sim1 perhaps you are one of the same but i will rely on the honesty of old IMC-UKers who were not linked to the likes of SWP and george galloway ... i ask again who is sim1?
whycensorpostswithoutreason
Non news
08.10.2008 21:29
Sim1 is a commentator not a moderator and had nothing to do with the post being hidden. The post had no content and the fact that politicians are sleazebags is hardly news. Find yourself a bulletin board to have your rants on.
As to spamming the newswire with your complaints about moderation, perhaps you should read the guidelines you claim not to have breached and see that you have in fact breached them. There is a publicly archived list to take your moderation queries to.
IMCista