Various arguments came forth from the cartoons such as freedom of speech vs. censorship; the depiction of religious figures in unflattering manners (many Muslims asked why similar cartoons of Jesus were not displayed); among others.
The Danish government stood firm and said that freedom of speech is guaranteed in Denmark, regardless of the content of material. Worldwide, Denmark became a bastion for freedom of speech. Many people applauded the attitude that came from Denmark, even those who may not have found the Mohammed cartoons to carry an astute message. Hooray for Denmark.
It seems that Denmark, instead of being the pinnacle for the concept of free speech, has fallen a few notches backward and now considers freedom of speech to be a matter only for those who agree with a message, not the totality of the philosophy.
On September 18, 2008, Aljazeera News ran a piece called, "Danish T-Shirt 'Terror’ Convictions." According to the article:A Danish appeals court has convicted six people who sold T-shirts bearing the logos of Colombian and Palestinian resistance groups of supporting banned "terrorist" organizations.
About 300 T-shirts were sold for $33 each, with 75 cents from each sale going towards a Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) radio station and a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) graphics studio.
The six were connected to the Danish activist group Fighters and Lovers, which sold shirts printed with FARC and PFLP logos.These actions of the Danish justice system are lame. In addition, there are many quandaries raised.
The two groups mentioned are considered terrorist groups by the U.S. and the E.U., but their designation came only because the U.S. affixed the name "terrorist" to them. Millions of people worldwide consider FARC and PFLP to be legitimate resistance movements. Their actions fall along these lines.
In the case of FARC, the Colombian government has taken many more actions than the resistance group that would be construed as terrorist. Only a few months ago, the Colombian government sent military assassins into Ecuador, a sovereign nation, to kill some FARC leaders. The diplomatic fallout of Colombia’s intrusion are still visible today.
Possibly the biggest contradiction of this entire mess is that the government of Denmark joined the U.S. in the "coalition of the willing" and sent troops to Iraq to participate in one of the largest terrorist activities of modern times:the destruction of Iraq caused by an illegal invasion in March 2003.
Freedom of speech is a grand concept, but it can not be diluted. The Danish government should hold its head in shame after convicting a few committed and peaceful human beings who were only trying to serve justice. Instead of buckling, the government should have proudly stated that freedom of speech is alive and well in Denmark and that no one will alter the Danish commitment. Instead, it took the cowardly route.
There is one question I will pose and maybe someone will investigate and find an answer: How much did the Danes receive from the U.S. government for pulling such a stunt?
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
Ban the T shirts!
22.09.2008 14:57
Just think of the children and highly impressionable young adults who might see such shirts.
Pete
OK but..
22.09.2008 15:20
A T-shirt is just a T-shirt.
A Radical Fool
Or, better yet.
22.09.2008 15:38
A Radical Fool
Pete bought the propaganda
22.09.2008 15:40
I'd prefer a T-shirt
Ban the T shirts Part 2
22.09.2008 22:43
In Denmark however, people have been killed by violent terrorist groups in the very recent past, so it is not surprising that T shirts advertising violent, terrorist, criminal groups are not that popular.
Try walking through Warrington town centre with an IRA T shirt on if you want to grasp what I'm going on about.
Pete
Pete your argument is inconsistent
23.09.2008 08:49
The USA only took the ANC of its list of terrorist organisations this year.
I'd prefer a T-shirt
under Geneva Convention clause moot interpretation points
23.09.2008 10:22
Now this doesn't mean they put in orders to the sweatshops for funky camuflage fractal designs, or like the best & worst of the late 20th century go to the army surplus store and trust in the snazzy balaclava & black beret finishing touches. Nope. things have moved with the times. A t-shirt can identify group identity & purpose perfectly. So............... a bunch of whatevers in matching t-shirts holding AK's are one step closer to identifying themselves as a militia or territorial armed force in rebellion, war of self-determination or insurgency if they are all wearing the same t-shirts with matching slogans and logos. One step closer to that status is one step further from terrorist status. Of course it's not an idea which appeals to guerilla warfare strategists. But it is one which gets attention from propagandists and politicians. In many ways it's being going on a long time too. During Ireland's war of independence in the 1920's De Valera (the politician) insisted the then IRA launch a uniform wearing attack on British forces - to fulfil the conditions to the sensible opposition of the commanders who knew it would be a near suicide venture. But it did satisfy an international community of "political status". You could write books about it, but your hopes of selling them would be slim as too many have already been written and ignored.
a t-shirt is never just a t-shirt.
¶ gurgle
Denmark is rotten - so another little thought specific to this news.
23.09.2008 22:55
¶ We have though recently looked at Denmark specifically, its freedom of speech issues and its secret services and the importance of one of the few whistleblowers to have the courage to shop their governments for collusion with the illegal war on Iraq.
so plug that ↩
"Support Danish WMD Whistleblower Frank Grevil" 9/9/08 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/09/408390.html
¶ As regards selling t-shirts to promote smaller groups in the Levant; be they in the occupied territories of Palestine or the Lebanon or Sinai - or perhaps more appropriately selling dinky little headbands which do seem more the contemporary side of groovy group guerilla wear - the well established groups already demonstrate perfectly the paradigm I touched upon in the last comment. For example whe we talk about Hamas or Hezbollah in number terms we can go several ways. Hezbollah are the most dramatic & not competing on site, in the fashion terms we're talking about, with the iconic Palestinian scarf which of course has gone beyond all ideology or knowledge (just like the Che Guevara image somebody mentioned above). In traditional paradigm terms they are merely dealing as a militia with political wing on the local front with a state military which cuts deals with them and having the regular showdown with the IDF. Let's leave out all of those sides backers & presume they take up enough collection money to pay the seamstresses enough to sew up the recognisable gear. But how many are we talking about? The grim gothic morbid lot who announce their willingness for martyrdom on their headbands? or the hundreds near thousands around them who wear the t-shirts? I suggest the t-shirt lot are the army & the grassroot support is the quarter of a million people who heeded their call in March 2005 to answer Bush's "cedar revolution" in the wake of Hariri's assassination with its people power of 30,000 or less than one eighth. As we know the "mad mullah revolution" outlasted the "cedar revolution" because when the Syrian army went up the Valley road to Damascus, they weren't needed anymore. T-shirts are in a way a fashion statement and also a sub cultural language & we may see they also play the part, an important part in the development of movements which combine politics, military activity, religion, ethnicity and all the stuff which the 21st century is going to do in many places....... Going to do....... not going to see done. Some t-shirts are now part of the scene whether you like them or not. Some old scarves aren't ever going to go away but a millionaire in jeans on dress-down Friday on a Harley ------ a biker cooking meth ------- doth not make.
I reckon we should go on keeping an eye on the rotten Danes. Yes. But criticise them for the right things. I wouldn't have promoted those t-shirts in the same way I promoted the "Kill Bush" t-shirt which used the Kill Bill movie image. & you know - those t-shirts never sold out.
↩ribbid