Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Irish Redress Board Condemns Innocent Men

Setanta. | 04.05.2008 23:00 | Repression | Social Struggles | World

Draconian Irish law is seen and felt at its worst when members of the public become victims of false allegations made against them at the Residential Institutions Redress Board,Dublin,Ireland.

The Irish Residential Institutions Redress Board Condemns Innocent Men.

The Irish Redress Board was set up under The Residential Institutions Redress Act 2002. This Board was put there to deal with issues of alleged abuse made by claimants who had lived as children under the care of the state in industrial schools many years ago. Such was the level of complaints of mistreatment and assault inflicted on children for generations, that special action had to be taken.

The Irish Government brought in legislation to fast track the complaints. There would be no need for a court hearing. All the complainant had to do was to name the alleged abuser, and his case was processed. Substantial awards were made on this basis. The accused would not be prosecuted, but his name and reputation would be tarnished. That is, if he was guilty in the first place.

But what if the accused person was innocent ? What if he had been in the wrong place at the wrong time, and met the wrong people ? Just imagine a situation where your good name had been used to justify a claim, and you being listed as a child abuser to secure a fraudulent claim for someone else. A horrific situation, but one that is not all that uncommon.

Faced with a situation where your name is being used to justify a false claim, what would you do ?

Would you sit tight and hope that the whole thing would blow over, and maybe hope that nobody would hear about it. After all, if there was no prosecution it would not become public. But what about your reputation and your legacy. Things have an unhappy knack of turning up in the most peculiar forms.

One man in the South East of Ireland made a decision. He was not happy. His name had been used by a claimant. A substantial amount of money was awarded on foot of a false allegation, and this innocent man was pilloried as a result.

The fact that this named victim was not prosecuted by the state offered little solace. His reputation and his family life were in tatters. He complained to the Health Services and other state bodies. That’s when the real trouble began. He obviously had walked in on something that was sacrosanct.
It looks now as if the whole thing was a set up.

The claimants could name anyone. As long as they had a name listed, they got their award.

Guilt or innocence had nothing to do with it. The objective was to indemnify those that had suffered in the industrial schools. By hook or by crook, they were going to get their award. When they listed a name, that was it. Everyone then rolled in behind the presumption of guilt.

Priests, Nuns and other parties must have known that innocent men were being condemned.

Did they willingly collude in the whole charade ?

It was one way of getting off the hook. Get someone up to take the hit, and everyone else is purged of guilt. Abuse in the industrial schools was systematic. The authorities must have known what was going on. It suited them to do nothing. If the truth were known, guilt would be spread out to include a wider circle. The Redress Board put a halt to that. It suited the establishment to contain the problem.

All that was needed was a fall guy, a sacrificial lamb to absorb all the guilt. A man in the South East of Ireland can testify to this. He lived to tell the tale.

Setanta.
- e-mail: setantasetantaone@yahoo.ie

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Clerical abuse

05.05.2008 10:39

Both physical and sexual abuse were endemic in the Irish school system. I was fortunate not to have been sexually abused, although one member of the Christian Brothers did make a sexual suggestion to me, . But I was physically assaulted on a number of occasions, and I do not mean just the routine slapping on the hand, I was punched in the face and chest, beaten about the face, and kicked about the legs and body. This was done to me by two different members of the Christian Brothers, and each of them did it on more than one occasion. I was verbally abused and humiliated too on numerous occasions.

I am not going to go into too much detail, I have recently settled my case and I cannot disclose how much compensation I received but it could not by any means be described as "substantial".

I know that a couple of other boys at the same orphanage were subjected to sexual abuse and saw one of them being fondled by a Christian Brother. I saw other boys being punched and kicked too. I saw one boy being forced to sit in a waste paper basket and being told he was rubbish. He was subjected to further verbal and physical abuse.

I agree that the standard of proof required was not the same as would be required in a court of law, but how can people in their sixties and seventies be expected to produce witnesses to things that happened forty, fifty years ago? or even longer?

The Catholic church got a good deal and was let off the hook with the assistance of the politicians.

ex-pupil


Evidence?

12.05.2008 22:42

It is not only the Irish Residential Institutions Redress Board which has received complaints. Look at the sheer scale of actual abuse in Ferns, or the evidence accumulating in the Dublin report:

"8 priests have been convicted in the criminal courts. 3 priests who have been the subject of allegations of child sexual abuse are currently before the courts.
To date, 112 civil actions have been brought against 32 Dublin priests or priests who held appointments in the Diocese. 72 have been concluded and 40 are ongoing.
Settlement of claims has amounted to €7.8 million (€5.6m in settlements and €2.2 m in legal costs for both sides). Since 2003 the Diocese has invested in the region of €3 million in Child Protection service and related services."
( http://www.dublindiocese.ie/index.php?option=com_conten...d=313)

The statistics printed by the Dublin Diocese indicate that at least 4.8% of Dublin priests (135 of 2,800 clerics) have been the subject of allegations of child sexual abuse.

'Setanta' is claiming that there are a lot of false allegations. If that were the case the Catholic Church would be crowing about finding them out. Why not check the press releases of the Dublin Diocese child protection service  http://www.cps.dublindiocese.ie/cat_index_12.shtml and see if you can produce any evidence of false allegations. I will not hold my breadth.

Instant Karma


Corrected URL

12.05.2008 23:00

The first link I gave does not work. Here it is corrected-
 http://www.dublindiocese.ie/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=635&Itemid=313

Instant Karma


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech