Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Guns and Butter: 9/11 Blueprint: The Architecture of Destruction

Bonnie Faulkner interviewing Richard Gage | 06.09.2007 12:30 | History | Terror War | Sheffield | World

Interview with Bay Area architect Richard Gage, AIA, about the organization he has formed, "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth". Outreach to architects and engineers; presentations to the public and to professionals; the physical evidence of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center twin towers and building seven. Visit his website at  http://ae911truth.org/ .

Guns and Butter: 9/11 Blueprint: The Architecture of Destruction - mp3 10M

9/11: Blueprint for Truth Front Cover
9/11: Blueprint for Truth Front Cover

9/11: Blueprint for Truth Back Cover
9/11: Blueprint for Truth Back Cover


The presentation that is referenced in the interview can be watched here:

 http://blip.tv/file/306082/

It can be downloaded (flv format, plays in vlc,  http://videolan.org/ ) from here (270Mb):

 http://blip.tv/file/get/NetVidProductions-HowTheTowesFell419.flv

There is audio version here:

 http://www.911podcasts.com/files/audio/20070420%20Richard%20Gage%20SSU%2080kbps.mp3

The presentation was also adapted for radio by Unwelcome Guests,  http://www.unwelcomeguests.org/

Unwelcome Guests: #374 - Why the Towers Fell
Proofs of Demolition by Explosives
 http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=24521

There is also a DVD of the presentation available from their site,  http://www.ae911truth.org/dvdorder.php but if you wait a while there will no doubt be torrents of it available.

For more on WTC Building 7, including video's of the collapse see:

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/09/350617.html#wtc7

Bonnie Faulkner interviewing Richard Gage
- Homepage: http://gunsandbutter.net/

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Wot? No 9/11 deniers yet?

06.09.2007 17:19

That makes a change! Perhaps the truth behind the 9/11 atrocity has just become too difficult to subvert?

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain

BonChance


We are still here...

07.09.2007 11:01

...but there is only so many times alot of us want to have the same arguments over and over again.

By the way, on the whole, when people who do not buy the 'inside job' speculation post onto these sort of threads, the usual response is that 'the powers that be' must be getting nervous as their 'disinformation agents' are out in force. This along with claims of being 'gatekeepers', 'spooks' or merely 'sheeple' Yet when no one can be arsed to respond, you start asking where they are?

Suffice to say, if the 'architects for 9/11 truth' are of equal calibre to the 'scholars for 9/11 truth' I would not trust one even to build a garden shed. All this stuff about freefall collapse into the buildings footprint, the alleged massive pools of molten steel - have been argued about and refuted many times on this site and elsewhere. Is it worth even having the debate over and over again? Frankly, I have never seen any convincing evidence put forward by 9/11 truthers to substantiate their wild and often contradictory claims, but you obviously think there is convincing evidence and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion.

Skeptic


Facts remain facts. Lies remain lies. 2+2=4

07.09.2007 20:46

Skeptic says: "the alleged massive pools of molten steel - have been argued about and refuted many times on this site and elsewhere."

How can you 'refute' hard data?

How come those who cling to the official story have all forsaken their senses? How come even rudimentary police detective methods are not applied to the mountain of discrepancies?

Skeptic also says "Is it worth even having the debate over and over again?"

No, of course not. It is time to move towards indictment of those who are already identified as having been implicated. Starting with N.Rockefeller, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Giuliani, Tenet etc ad nauseum.
.

Re-investigate NineEleven


Hard data?

11.09.2007 08:30

How can you refute hard data, you ask.

You have not presented any hard data for one thing. With respect to pools of molten metal, you have some eyewitness testimonies which apparently saw molten metal, but what metal it was remains unspecified - it could well have been aluminium from the planes, and office buildings and the numerous computers they house also contain alot of metal - you have to prove it was molten steel for your counter theory to carry any weight.

Whatever the alleged presence of thermite was on the steel beams, how do you know, 'for a fact' that this was not connected to the clearing up operation when the steel beams were cut up and removed. While we are at it, as far as I am aware, thermite does not explode, so why the emphasis on the alleged explosions heard by firemen, rescue workers etc.

More often than not your 'hard data' is nothing more than assumptions based on photographs and video footage. There is no hard evidence that the 'solid orange slag' being lifted out of the wrecakge by a crane in that over used photo is metal at all, it could have been fibre glass building insulation. Your case is built on assumption and more often than not, 'facts' which quickly become disputable if you make the effort at examing them in any detail. You can continue with your 'inside job' cult beliefs if you want, I still say you have no case.

Skeptic


Have you watched the 9/11 Blueprint for Truth film?

16.09.2007 13:33

Hi Skeptic,

I wondered if you had actually watched this movie? I haven't yet though I have just ordered it from the States. I ask because you seem very convinced that there's no good evidence that the official story is wrong.

I guess you could say I'm biased (being essentially a believer) but when I see the footage of those relatively small planes crashing into those massive towers and then the towers going completely into free-fall collapse within an hour or two, well to me it just looks suspicious as hell. I mean, these are gigantic steel and concrete towers, designed to withstand a multiplicity of such impacts surely? I'm not a structural engineer, for sure, though I worked in construction for years. To me I don't buy it that so terrific an inferno could have been generated by the planes impact to bring down steel like that. I sure can't see any such fire on any of the films. To me the whole thing just looks dodgy as anything. I'm pretty sure that the vast majority of brits with any construction experience at all would say the same. I mean, surely you have to admit it really does look suspect? I'm open-minded and happy to hear any good ideas you have that say it was fire, or whatever.

With respect

Nick Sandberg

Nick Sandberg
mail e-mail: nick227@tiscali.co.uk


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech