Although many of the allegations broadcast by Channel 4 involved London planning applications, the Rochdale-based “Save Spodden Valley campaign” is calling for an Inquiry.
The community campaign claims that the Manchester office of PPS Group was commissioned by Countryside Properties PLC to promote its planning application in 2005 to build over 600 homes and a children’s nursery on what was the world’s largest asbestos textile factory.
The controversial plans for the former Turner and Newall asbestos factory remain firmly on hold. Last month it was announced that the main developer, Countryside Properties PLC had pulled out of the deal. It is not known if the remaining developer, Heywood-based MMC Estates, has retained the services of PPS Group.
The 3 year community campaign in Rochdale has seen the developers:
- publicly apologise for “past actions” and “miscommunication”;
- The Advertising Standards Authority ruled against the developers for a “misleading” newsletter that breached their Code on honesty, truthfulness and substantiation;
- Countryside Properties were found to have “cybersquatted” misleading domain names that could have been confused with the local community campaign;
- BBC investigations revealed misleading assurances made on behalf of the developers about asbestos test results and exposed asbestos.
SSV campaign co-ordinator Jason Addy is shocked by the alleged tactics of PPS Group exposed on the Channel 4 Despatches programme. He is backing calls for an Inquiry into their activities in Rochdale.
“The last 3 years have seen some very odd goings-on in Rochdale with the asbestos site planning application. We’ve had several mysterious telephone calls and email enquiries.
“I don’t know whether PPS Group have been involved in any of this. If not, a thorough Inquiry should give them an opportunity to clear their name”.
The Dispatches documentary also revealed party political donations to various constituencies that were subject to controversial planning applications. Although no allegations were levelled at Rochdale, such claims have angered Spodden Valley’s asbestos campaigners:
“Exposure to asbestos dust can cause terminal cancer. If anyone is found guilty of corruption in trying to gain planning permission on toxic sites, then they should see the inside of a prison cell”.
The section of the Dispatches investigation into PPS Group can be viewed at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8576816145694781888&q=DISPATCHES%3A+BRITAIN%E2%80%99S+BAD+HOUSING&total=2&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
(From 16 minutes 50 seconds to 25 minutes 24 seconds)
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
muppets squeezed by the balls...
02.08.2007 00:15
goggy
PPS Group- slippery, sly and they don't reveal all the facts...
02.08.2007 07:37
HMS Ganges planning application. Trust me, it was nasty stuff.
Yet PPS Group's website brags about it in one of their Case Studies:
http://www.ppsgroup.info/CaseStudies.aspx?page=5
PPS group proudly state:
"The aim – to secure consent for a residential led mixed-use scheme on the HMS Ganges site. The site had a history of failed applications and significant transport issues. [WITH THE HUGE PROFITS AT STAKE IT WAS WORTH BRINGING PPS GROUP IN FOR ANOTHER ROLL OF THE DICE]
The proposal was strongly opposed by a residents’ association, led by a media-savvy and publicly recognised figurehead. [FORMER BBC NEWSREADER LAURIE MAYER]
To counter this PPS undertook quantitative analysis to identify supportive residents. A newsletter and telephone survey then generated a petition and letters of support from residents of Shotley Gate in favour of the scheme. Shotley Gate residents felt overlooked because of the noise the residents’ association was making, which didn’t reflect their own views, and when given the opportunity they were keen to express their support to Babergh District Council. [LIE, DIVIDE AND CONQUER]
Positive press coverage prior to the planning committee added weight to the case presented by the applicant in a briefing for members. In addition, at the committee meeting a well-connected stakeholder, the local Post Master, spoke in support of the scheme. [USE LOCAL PEOPLE THEN DROP THEM LIKE A STONE AFTERWARDS]
The proposal gained planning consent at the committee meeting on 14 June 2005".
But does PPS Group represent all the facts on their website?
NO.
They forget to mention their "sucess" was then rejected by the Secretary of State:
http://www.myshotley.com/ganges-more280706.html
I suppose that self-promotion is the Achilles Heel for spin doctors of PPS Group. They spend that much time sprouting bullshit that it can go above their necks and they drown in it.
Former PPS Group employees with a conscience will change this though.
Shotley Observer