Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Get Bikes Off the Roads

Outraged | 16.05.2007 14:16 | Climate Chaos | Free Spaces | Social Struggles | World

Yep that is what the new Highway Code wants....
Consider signing this petition and spreading the word if this is not entirely anathama to your political attitudes (if you don't want to sign this then please go and do something useful in the way of Direct Action - hell why not just do both!)
 http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/roads4bikes/

The new highway code requries cyclsits to use cycle facilities 'wherever possible'. Many facilities are of poor standard, or just plain dangerous. cyclists should not be forced to use such facilities against their better judgment.

In short, cyclists should be allowed to use the road.

 http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/roads4bikes/

Outraged

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Weld two bikes

16.05.2007 15:08

together and take up the space of a car.Let them know your there.

Welder


keep them on the road but off the pavement

16.05.2007 16:21

number of times a bikes bumped into me while walking down a busy pavement; or almost run me over while using a crossing.

sure bikes should be treated with respect but they need to apply that to other road/pavement users.

How many cyclists have even read the highway code? Most drivers haven't since they sat their test :(

runover


Cycle lanes

16.05.2007 17:09

It is because of the poor provision of cycle lanes that cyclists end up on the pavement. And then there is the token effort of local councils who provide 'cycle lanes' simply by painting a white line on the pavement and expecting cyclists and pedestrians to share the pavement.

My main road into town - about a quarter of a mile- consists of a cycle lane that starts off on the pavement, then vears off into a bus lane, then stops which mean the cyclist has to get into the appropriate lane for about five meters (which can mean crossing up to three lanes of traffic), then back to the bus lane, back into the appropriate lane again, and the very last two meters is back to the pavement. The road is a steep decline so invariably the traffic is moving quickly, especially the cyclist. Can you imagine just how dangerous it then becomes to have a cyclist swerve off the pavement into the traffic, accross the traffic twice and back onto the pavement again - it is a journey that takes less than three minutes.

As a cyclist I don't want to share a pavement with a pedestrian and I don't want to risk my life by following the guidance in the Highway Code. We do need proper cycle lanes and surely it is in the best interests of all road and pavement users to be supporting this rather than just moaning about cyclists.

Matron of Mischeif


When cars occupy the road space some cyclists take to the pavement...

16.05.2007 18:02

I keep to the Highway Code - within reason, when I can. There are times when I do take to the pavement and usually this is because my path is obstructed by tin-box driving idiots doing their damned hardest to trash the planet. Sitting in traffic, i.e. obstructing the highway with one of those 'car' contrivances (no passengers, motor running) should be made an offence. People do it, day in, day out without any consideration for road users that do not obstruct the highway (cyclists) and without any consideration for the environment. How long should they be put up with, particularly when they have the arrogance to go on about cyclists jumping lights, riding pavements and being a law unto themselves?
Motorists - the sub-species of the human race that they are - might not be extinct but they certainly will be soon. Luckily all the oil is running out and there are not going to be 'leccy cars, divine intervention excepted. Motoring is finito and all their little lights, pointless one-way systems and 'parking lots' will be gone too. Assuming the motorists don't end up destroying the world in their fight for their right to 'sit in traffic' only bicycles will be left. Or will it be 'recumbent trikes' by then?

Silly Billy


crap cycle lanes

17.05.2007 07:50

Round here, our cycle lanes have been created by people who think that we have nothing better to do than weave on and off the pavement, and give way to motorised traffic at every side road we pass, making a five minute journey take at least three times as long. This new rule would be totally unenforceable. I'm all for well thought-out cycle lanes but I won't be forced onto totally useless ones.

More critical mass actions needed everywhere.

byker


Keep bikes off the road --- YES, YES, YES!!!

26.06.2007 17:45

Bikes on London's roads are a meance. The new higway code needs to be adopted oer se. Bike tracks for the sole use of bikes need building in quantity and then it should be an offence for bikes to use roads wherever these tracks are available.

Biles are very dangerous on the road and in the event of an accident it is almost always the bike rider that gets hurt. The ONLY safe way to promote biking is to safely seperate them from the many drivers who do not understand biking.

I am not anti-biking, I am anti accident and banning bikes from the roads where there is a valid bike track would be a major step forward in road and rider safety.

Pete Smith
mail e-mail: rederikus@yahoo.com


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech