We are all familiar with the tired methods of political inversion, murderers screaming victim in order to confuse and deceive is a very popular strategy of lacklustre, inept and visionless, conservative politicians. Costello is known for his lack of understanding regarding the public consciousness. Nevertheless, he retains his front bench position based on his ability as a parliamentary performer – Costello would be well advised not to venture outside his area of expertise; the public is able to detect grating contradictions and screaming hypocrisies!
Howard’s constant use of the word “justice” in relation to the Hicks case is probably the most ludicrous attempt at deception and subterfuge to date. Whatever is said about Guantanamo Bay and the illegal military commission, the word “justice” could never be applied. If you are so confident that ‘justice’ has been served, Mr. Howard, why then did you arrange with the US military to have a gag order placed on Hicks – surely YOU don’t have anything to hide?
For years Howard’s Attorney General, Philip Ruddock, hid behind the excuse of “TESTING” the Hicks case in a bona fide legal arena. However, the lack of real evidence proved problematic for the US military. Rumsfeld to the rescue, the US military was given license in 2002 to utilise torture methods to force detainees to incriminate themselves and anybody who the military deemed to be a threat to them or their masters – in flagrant contravention of the Geneva Convention torture would now be utilised to manufacture ‘evidence’! Is this the “TESTING” you had in mind Mr. ‘comic book’ Attorney General?
Hicks resisted five long torturous years prior to his ‘confession’ – we draw your attention to the British sailors currently spilling their guts to the mass media after only a few weeks in Iranian custody. After five years enduring physical and psychological TORTURE, the veracity of any 'extracted' information or “confessions” would obviously be in question. Howard’s constant reference to a “CONFESSION” may be perceived by the public as a desperate 'stutter' from a known war criminal.
A previous article stated the Hicks case had the potential to bring down the government. Anyone familiar with the Australian psyche and the treatment the conservative Howard government displayed toward Hicks would have understood the negative consequences.
We can hardly wait for the next instalment of gaffes, fumbling and desperate innuendos from a government thrashing in quicksand!
[The opposition leader, Kevin Dudd, is conspicuous by his LACK OF COMMITMENT on this very important issue.]
Source:
![](/img/extlink.gif)
Comments
Display the following comment