Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Chemicals cause silent pandemic

Polly Ester Cotton | 10.11.2006 02:57 | Analysis | Ecology | Health | World

The combined evidence suggests that neurodevelopmental disorders caused by industrial chemicals has created a silent pandemic.

According to recent studies published in the medical journal, The Lancet, commonly-used chemicals are causing a significant rise in developmental brain disorders including autism, ADHD and cerebral palsy.

Research identified 202 potentially harmful chemicals, including mercury, solvents, and pesticides, that are most likely to be contributing to the dramatically rising pandemic of irreversible neurological disorders. Although, they estimate that there are more than 1,000 chemicals that are known to be neurotoxic in animals, and are also likely to be harmful to humans.

Developing brains are much more susceptible to toxic chemicals than those of adults, according to the researchers, and developing foetuses are at the highest risk. The report said;”The combined evidence suggests that neurodevelopmental disorders caused by industrial chemicals has created a silent pandemic”.

As many as one in six children are said to be affected today. Although toxic exposure can also have delayed consequences as well, causing Parkinson's disease or other neurological diseases in adults.

Polly Ester Cotton

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

Are there any links please

10.11.2006 13:11

be interested to follow this up .. thanx

Interested Party


Cure

10.11.2006 15:01

Interested Parties might find a reference to this in the curret New Scientist which is likley to be in good llibraries.

A few pages further on is "Way of the Hunters" which I photocopied after reading "..they do not define themselves by how they get their food but by how they relate to each other." Interested people might think that an irrelevant jump from chemical pollutants, but those who heard Zerzan might see a connection.

If we will run back about 150 years we are close to the coward Darwin and the idiot Marx making their contributions. Marx was an idiot not to see the necessity of a Dialectical Synthesis between his ideas and the ideas of Malthus. Darwin was a coward who sat on his ideas for twenty years until Alfred Russel Wallace wrote him a letter that effectively published "The Origin of the Species". The paragraph headings in Wallaces letter were used as the chapter headings in Darwin's book.

Wallace later went on to suggest the path of future human evolution, He talks of Hospitality and Co-operation as lines of evolutionary development. It may be that he also had a sharp idea about the polluting consequences of industrial development. Over sixty years ago in Neath old men talked about Coal being too precious to burn. Anyone know the source of that idea? Wallace was lecturing in the Mechanics Institute in Neath about 1850, The nephew of the man (died 1907) who coined the phrase 'Anarcho-Syndicalist' gave a pretty accurate description in 1943 of coming ecological catastrophe being the result of industrialisation..

If you think about that Bushman self description, you might conclude that Wallace was wrong about it being future evolution, it is the natural state of poor people. All the evils come from Money and Civilisation. We have to think on along Edward Carpenters' lines "Civilisation, its cause and cure" How do we effect the CURE?

Ilyan


Where's the Reference?

10.11.2006 16:16

What we've got so far is an assertion allegedly based on more than one study in the Lancet. No reference to the articles or quotes from them.

But apparently there's a reference to it in the latest New Scientist. Wwhat issue? What page? Quotes? No, because someone else wants to add some more unsourced allegations about Darwin, Marx, Wallace and Primitivism. Very kind I'm sure but not what was asked for.

This doesn't amount to anything, certainly not News, until you show us some sources.

I don't believe this


Links:

10.11.2006 17:43

See: Grandjean, P. and Landrigan, P.J. The Lancet, Nov. 8, 2006; Vol. 368: online edition. Philippe Grandjean, M.D., department of environmental health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Annette Kirshner, Ph.D., health science administrator, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

..or…

Chemical pollution 'responsible for silent pandemic of brain damage'
 http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1651552006

Millions of children 'damaged by chemicals'
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/08/nchems08.xml


Chemical pollution 'harms children's brains'
 http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article1962438.ece


Danger: chemical hazards
 http://environment.guardian.co.uk/waste/story/0,,1943058,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1


A 'Silent Pandemic' Of Brain Disorders
 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/07/health/webmd/main2161153.shtml


A Silent Pandemic: Industrial Chemicals Are Impairing Brain Development Of Children Worldwide
 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/11/061108155004.htm



Or type “The Lancet chemicals autism” into Google news for all 77 news articles.

Definitely Not Lord Sainsbury


Believe References.

10.11.2006 17:57

The source for Darwin and Wallace was John North, a Turner and Fitter in Neath Abbey who around 1960 also gave a pretty full version of Wallace's lecture "The Advantages of a Varied Knowledge" which had been delivered in Neath in around 1846.

The sources for Marx was a professional agent of International Communism, and an Anarchist who had skipped South Africa in a hurry after being involved in organising mixed race trade unions back around 1920. The necessity for a Dialectical Synthesis of Marx and Malthus is what I later, around 1950, derived from their instruction.. I do not know how close the Chinese were to that thinking then.

Any of those three could run intellectual rings around most academics I have met.

Ilyan


Thank you Not-Lord S

11.11.2006 11:11

That's what I was wanting to see, thank you very much. Now I'm off to the library :)

Monkee


Medical Expediency

11.11.2006 15:17

It is a matter of record that there is mounting awareness and concern over the increasing manipulation of science and medicine by global corporations with vested interests which now amounts to a stranglehold.

It seems that this corporate control extends not only to a corrupted peer review process that results in a biased view being presented to the medical community by compliant or ineffectual editors of medical journals, but the US government now insists that scientists must be politically approved before the scientists can participate in meetings of the World Health Organisation.

As if the control of medical science by industry were not bad enough, it has long been suspected but now seems certain that governments themselves exert an equally tight stranglehold on a nation’s health.

By 2003, the UK Science Minister, Lord Sainsbury, had donated over £11 million to the Labour Party. The Science Minister has responsibility for the Office of Science and Technology and for the chemical and biotech industries, as well as for all the Research Councils, including the Medical Research Council. The Office of Science and Technology monitors all Government funding of research grants and it controls official science policy.

Crucially, it is “policy” that determines the research that Government permits to be funded. This was most tellingly confirmed by the Secretary of State for Health (answered by Yvette Cooper) in a written answer to a question asking about funding for research into the causes of, and cure for, ME (Hansard: 11 May 2000: 461W 462W). In her reply, Ms Cooper stated “The Department funds research to support policy and the delivery of effective health practice in the National Health Service”. This seems to confirm the invincibly circuitous nature of Government strategy.

However, even more disturbing information has just been released and was posted on Co-cure on 26th June 2004 at 19.06 (Co-cure NOT; ACT: [US]: WHO scientists will require clearance). The notice states that the Bush administration has ordered that Government scientists must be approved by a senior political appointee before they can participate in meetings of the World Health Organisation. Officials at the WHO in Geneva say this could compromise the independence of international scientific deliberations.

The request is the latest instance in which the Bush administration has been accused of allowing politics to intrude into the once-sacrosanct areas of scientific deliberation. Prominent scientists accused the administration of “misrepresenting and suppressing scientific knowledge for political purposes”. Republican Henry Waxman said “This new policy politicises the process of providing the expert advice of US scientists to the international community”.

The WHO is the United Nations agency dedicated to health. It traditionally insists on picking experts to sit on official scientific panels, but William Steiger, godson of President Bush’s father (former President George HW Bush), stated in a letter declaring the new vetting policy that civil service and other regulations “require experts to serve as representatives of the US government at all times and advocate US Government policies”.



See also:

"The present upsurge in chemically-induced ME/ICD-CFS"

DUed


Ecoquiz

11.11.2006 22:23

Thank you very much for information and how are we going to act upon it?

1) start an endless discussion,
2) get together with a few friends and produce a leaflet to give outside supermarkets, with the list of the most dangerous chemicals,
3) dress as carrots,
4) start a riot,
6) write to the Prime Minister,
7) drink to forget,
7b) smoke a lot of dope,
8) do something else,
9) do nothing.

greengrass


"how are we going to act upon it?"

12.11.2006 00:36

Getting together with a few friends to produce a leaflet to give outside supermarkets, with the list of the most dangerous chemicals would be a positive way of sublimating personal energy, but perhaps a more constructive effort would be to point and laugh at so-called green politicians until they address this silent pandemic as well as the more popular issue of the global warming.

Socialists needn’t feel smug at my mockery of the greens, you all need to make yourselves aware of this hidden pollution and health issue too. Millions are affected and everyone is at risk, although some more than others...

Most of the people affected by this pandemic can not (for one reason or another) represent themselves. They need political and social campaigners to help represent them. And that my friend means YOU!

Be inspired. Read about it. Tell others. We need a revolution of attitudes. Help change social consciousness.

Spread the word!


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech