Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

David Blunket Sanctioned The Machine Gunning Of Rioting Prisoners

John Bowden | 27.10.2006 10:52 | Repression | Social Struggles | London | Sheffield | World

The true mentality of former Home Secretary David Blunket and his political supporters within the government was chillingly revealed in October of this year with the revelation that he had ordered an ex-Director General of the prison system to sanction the machine gunning of rioting prisoners at Lincoln jail four years ago.

Former Director General Martin Narey and a prison governor claimed that during an uprising at Lincoln jail in 2002 during which prisoners held part of the jail over night, Blunket contacted Narey and ordered him to call in the army and massacre the rioters. Blunket is said to have “shrieked” down the telephone to Narey that he did not care about the loss of life when re-taking the jail and promised Narey absolute political cover for dealing with the uprising. Narey refused Blunket's order and was accused by him of “dithering”, while describing his own behavior as “bold and decisive”.

The prisoners who Blunket wanted slaughtered Attica-style were for the most part short term petty offenders or untried prisoners who had revolted over intolerable conditions at Lincoln. In Blunket's twisted view however, they had forfeited the right to life by challenging the system and should have been eradicated as a consequence.

Blunket's credentials as a racist and extreme right winger are well established, but his response to the Lincoln jail uprising reveal the true extent of his fascist mentality and show just how far he was prepared to pursue state repression in the interests of the system. The critical point, however, is that Blunket wasn't some maverick right-wing lunatic whose opinion of how the rioting prisoners at Lincoln should be dealt with was an isolated one in the Home Office. The truth is that Blunket's reactionary, brutish views regarding prisoners are sentiments representative of a whole mindset within the Home Office and absolutely consistent with the treatment of “unmanageable” prisoners for years. Blunket, always fearful of another protracted Strangeways-like revolt whilst Home Secretary was simply giving verbal expression to a view of how such revolts should be put down in future that is keenly subscribed to by a whole core element within the Home Office and prison officer movement and a view absolutely central to the New Labour project of viciously crushing resistance and defiance amongst the poor and oppressed wherever it manifests itself.

John Bowden

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Narey is a hypocrite

27.10.2006 14:15

Blunkett clearly is, and always was, a sadistic neo-fascist. But the hidden villain of this place is the so-called whistle-blower. At the time Blunkett said his stuff, Martin Narey never said a fucking word. Now Narey has left the Prison Service, acts like a born-again liberal, is employed as head of Barnados (presumably on a fat salary) and goes around saying too many people are locked up, the system treats them badly and there should be a public inquiry into the deaths of Joseph Scholes and other children. But at the time Blunkett wanted the Lincoln protesters murdered, and the families of Joseph and the other boys were being told the system HAD killed their kids, his silence was deafening.

Nicki


At least...

27.10.2006 16:16

he had the sense to try and delegate this task. One of his saner ideas.

20:20


The Diaries

27.10.2006 17:11

The more I read politicians' memoirs, the more I have to conclude that them being in the loop in any sprawling conspiracies is just absurd: they are fucking idiots.

Focus Group


not quite

27.10.2006 21:48

"Sanctioning" implies something that actually happened and was approved of by what ever authority. I'm not aware of prisoners at that place being machine gunned or that its the case that it was ever likely.

So Blunkett got pissed off and was unreasonable and exaggerrated in what he said. That's not at all the same thing as "sanctioning" a massacre. Don't write sillyness here please.

Cal


Double your intelligence or no money back, guaranteed!

28.10.2006 06:18

Hugh Jarce


Quite!

29.10.2006 20:32

Sanction means "authoritative permission or approval". Since permission is usually given before something happens it follows that the thing itself doesn't have to happen to be sanctioned first. It is entirely accurate to say something was sanctioned (given permission) without it ever happening.

To claim Blunkett simply "got pissed off and was unreasonable and exaggerrated in what he said" is denial of the fact that he was Home Secretary and the highest authority in dealing with the situation. Had Narey been of similar mind to Blunkett then the army would have been called in and prisoner protesters may well have been massacred.

There is no sillyness in the article but there is sillyness - or at least denial - about the extent of just how right wing our current government is.

steve


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech