On 13th September the White House said that there is “overwhelming evidence” that Bin Laden is behind the 9/11 attacks http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091301overwhelmingevidence
Perhaps this "evidence" is from his bugged satellite phone? http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&startpos=1800#alate1101phoneruse
They know the names of the hijackers by 11am on 11th September http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101evidencetrail
Bin Laden's last known public appearance was on 25th November 2001 http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&startpos=1800#a112501milawa
In December 2001 more journalists than US troops are at Tora Bora in the "search" for Bin Laden http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=aearly1201journalists
But there is no evidence for Bin Laden being involved with 9/11: "the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11" http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060610&articleId=2623
The US DOJ hasn't said that there will be no indictment for Bin Laden they just haven't produced one and refuse to answer questions about it. http://www.teamliberty.net/id290.html
Do you ever get the feeling that you have been lied to?
Comments
Hide the following comment
repost
26.10.2006 14:27
bored