And what about our soldiers? Terry Jemison of the Department of Veterans Affairs reported this week to the American Free Press that "Gulf-era veterans" now on medical disability since 1991 number 518,739, with only 7,035 reported wounded in Iraq in that same 14-year period.
This week the American Free Press dropped a "dirty bomb" on the Pentagon by reporting that eight out of 20 men who served in one unit in the 2003 U.S. military offensive in Iraq now have malignancies. That means that 40 percent of the soldiers in that unit have developed malignancies in just 16 months.
Since these soldiers were exposed to vaccines and depleted uranium (DU) only, this is strong evidence for researchers and scientists working on this issue, that DU is the definitive cause of Gulf War Syndrome. Vaccines are not known to cause cancer. One of the first published researchers on Gulf War Syndrome, who also served in 1991 in Iraq, Dr. András Korényi-Both, is in agreement with Barbara Goodno from the Department of Defense's Deployment Health Support Directorate, that in this war soldiers were not exposed to chemicals, pesticides, bioagents or other suspect causes this time to confuse the issue.
This powerful new evidence is blowing holes in the cover-up perpetrated by the Pentagon and three presidential administrations ever since DU was first used in 1991 in the Persian Gulf War. Fourteen years after the introduction of DU on the battlefield in 1991, the long-term effects have revealed that DU is a death sentence and very nasty stuff.
Scientists studying the biological effects of uranium in the 1960s reported that it targets the DNA. Marion Fulk, a nuclear physical chemist retired from the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab and formerly involved with the Manhattan Project, interprets the new and rapid malignancies in soldiers from the 2003 war as "spectacular, and a matter of concern."
This evidence shows that of the three effects which DU has on biological systems -- radiation, chemical and particulate -- the particulate effect from nano-size particles is the most dominant one immediately after exposure and targets the Master Code in the DNA. This is bad news, but it explains why DU causes a myriad of diseases which are difficult to define.
In simple words, DU "trashes the body." When asked if the main purpose for using it was for destroying things and killing people, Fulk was more specific: "I would say that it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people."
Soldiers developing malignancies so quickly since 2003 can be expected to develop multiple cancers from independent causes. This phenomenon has been reported by doctors in hospitals treating civilians following NATO bombing with DU in Yugoslavia in 1998-1999 and the U.S. military invasion of Iraq using DU for the first time in 1991. Medical experts report that this phenomenon of multiple malignancies from unrelated causes has been unknown until now and is a new syndrome associated with internal DU exposure.
Just 467 U.S. personnel were wounded in the three-week Persian Gulf War in 1990-1991. Out of 580,400 soldiers who served in Gulf War I, 11,000 are dead, and by 2000 there were 325,000 on permanent medical disability. This astounding number of disabled vets means that a decade later, 56 percent of those soldiers who served now have medical problems.
The number of disabled vets reported up to 2000 has been increasing by 43,000 every year. Brad Flohr of the Department of Veterans Affairs told American Free Press that he believes there are more disabled vets now than even after World War II.
They brought it home
Not only were soldiers exposed to DU on and off the battlefields, but they brought it home. DU in the semen of soldiers internally contaminated their wives, partners and girlfriends. Tragically, some women in their 20s and 30s who were sexual partners of exposed soldiers developed endometriosis and were forced to have hysterectomies because of health problems.
In a group of 251 soldiers from a study group in Mississippi who had all had normal babies before the Gulf War, 67 percent of their post-war babies were born with severe birth defects. They were born with missing legs, arms, organs or eyes or had immune system and blood diseases. In some veterans' families now, the only normal or healthy members of the family are the children born before the war.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has stated that they do not keep records of birth defects occurring in families of veterans.
How did they hide it?
Before a new weapons system can be used, it must be fully tested. The blueprint for depleted uranium weapons is a 1943 declassified document from the Manhattan Project.
Harvard President and physicist James B. Conant, who developed poison gas in World War I, was brought into the Manhattan Project by the father of presidential candidate John Kerry. Kerry 's father served at a high level in the Manhattan Project and was a CIA agent.
Conant was chair of the S-1 Poison Gas Committee, which recommended developing poison gas weapons from the radioactive trash of the atomic bomb project in World War II. At that time, it was known that radioactive materials dispersed in bombs from the air, from land vehicles or on the battlefield produced very fine radioactive dust which would penetrate all protective clothing, any gas mask or filter or the skin. By contaminating the lungs and blood, it could kill or cause illness very quickly.
They also recommended it as a permanent terrain contaminant, which could be used to destroy populations by contaminating water supplies and agricultural land with the radioactive dust.
The first DU weapons system was developed for the Navy in 1968, and DU weapons were given to and used by Israel in 1973 under U.S. supervision in the Yom Kippur war against the Arabs.
The Phalanx weapons system, using DU, was tested on the USS Bigelow out of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in 1977, and DU weapons have been sold by the U.S. to 29 countries.
Military research report summaries detail the testing of DU from 1974-1999 at military testing grounds, bombing and gunnery ranges and at civilian labs under contract. Today 42 states are contaminated with DU from manufacture, testing and deployment.
Women living around these facilities have reported increases in endometriosis, birth defects in babies, leukemia in children and cancers and other diseases in adults. Thousands of tons of DU weapons tested for decades by the Navy on four bombing and gunnery ranges around Fallon, Nevada, is no doubt the cause of the fastest growing leukemia cluster in the U.S. over the past decade. The military denies that DU is the cause.
The medical profession has been active in the cover-up -- just as they were in hiding the effects from the American public -- of low level radiation from atmospheric testing and nuclear power plants. A medical doctor in Northern California reported being trained by the Pentagon with other doctors, months before the 2003 war started, to diagnose and treat soldiers returning from the 2003 war for mental problems only.
Medical professionals in hospitals and facilities treating returning soldiers were threatened with $10,000 fines if they talked about the soldiers or their medical problems. They were also threatened with jail.
Reporters have also been prevented access to more than 14,000 medically evacuated soldiers flown nightly since the 2003 war in C-150s from Germany who are brought to Walter Reed Hospital near Washington, D.C.
Dr. Robert Gould, former president of the Bay Area chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), has contacted three medical doctors since February 2004, after I had been invited to speak about DU.
1. Dr. Katharine Thomasson, president of the Oregon chapter of the PSR, informed me that Dr. Gould had contacted her and tried to convince her to cancel her invitation for me to speak about DU at Portland State University on April 12. Although I was able to do a presentation, Dr. Thomasson told me I could only talk about DU in Oregon "and nothing overseas, nothing political."
2. Dr. Gould also contacted and discouraged Dr. Ross Wilcox in Toronto, Canada, from inviting me to speak to Physicians for Global Survival (PGS), the Canadian equivalent of PSR, several months later.
3. When that didn't work, he contacted Dr. Allan Connoly, the Canadian national president of PGS, who was able to cancel my invitation and nearly succeeded in preventing Dr. Wilcox, his own member, from showing photos and presenting details on civilians suffering from DU exposure and cancer provided to him by doctors in southern Iraq.
Dr. Janette Sherman, a former and long-standing member of PSR, reported that she finally quit some time after being invited to lunch by a new PSR executive administrator. After the woman had pumped Dr. Sherman for information all through lunch about her position on key issues, the woman informed Dr. Sherman that her last job had been with the CIA.
How was the truth about DU hidden from military personnel serving in successive DU wars? Before his tragic death, Sen. Paul Wellstone informed Joyce Riley, R.N., B.S.N., executive director of the American Gulf War Veterans Association, that 95 percent of Gulf War veterans had been recycled out of the military by 1995. Any of those continuing in military service were isolated from each other, preventing critical information being transferred to new troops. The "next DU war" had already been planned, and those planning it wanted "no skunk at the garden party."
The US has a dirty (DU) little (CIA) secret
A new book just published at the American Free Press by Michael Collins Piper, The High Priests of War: The Secret History of How America's Neo-Conservative Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in Their Drive for Global Empire, details the early plans for a war against the Arab world by Henry Kissinger and the neo-cons in the late 1960s and early 1970s. That just happens to coincide with getting the DU "show on the road" and the oil crisis in the Middle East, which caused concern not only to President Nixon. The British had been plotting and scheming for control of the oil in Iraq for decades since first using poison gas on the Iraqis and Kurds in 1912.
The book details the creation of the neo-cons by their "godfather" and Trotsky lover Irving Kristol, who pushed for a "war against terrorism" long before 9/11 and was lavishly funded for years by the CIA. His son, William Kristol, is one of the most influential men in the United States.
Both are public relations men for the Israeli lobby's neo-conservative network, with strong ties to Rupert Murdoch. Kissinger also has ties to this network and the Carlyle Group, who, one could say, have facilitated these omnicidal wars beginning from the time former President Bush took office. It would be easy to say that we are recycling World Wars I and II, with the same faces.
When I asked Vietnam Special Ops Green Beret Capt. John McCarthy, who could have devised this omnicidal plan to use DU to destroy the genetic code and genetic future of large populations of Arabs and Moslems in the Middle East and Central Asia -- just coincidentally the areas where most of the world's oil deposits are located -- he replied: "It has all the handprints of Henry Kissinger."
In Zbignew Brzezinski's book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, the map of the Eurasian chessboard includes four regions strategic to U.S. foreign policy. The "South" region corresponds precisely to the regions now contaminated permanently with radiation from U.S. bombs, missiles and bullets made with thousands of tons of DU.
A Japanese professor, Dr. K. Yagasaki, has calculated that 800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The U.S. has used more DU since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. Four nuclear wars indeed, and 10 times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from atmospheric testing!
No wonder our soldiers, their families and the people of the Middle East, Yugoslavia and Central Asia are sick. But as Henry Kissinger said after Vietnam when our soldiers came home ill from Agent Orange, "Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used for foreign policy."
Unfortunately, more and more of those soldiers are men and women with brown skin. And unfortunately, the DU radioactive dust will be carried around the world and deposited in our environments just as the "smog of war" from the 1991 Gulf War was found in deposits in South America, the Himalayas and Hawaii.
In June 2003, the World Health Organization announced in a press release that global cancer rates will increase 50 percent by 2020. What else do they know that they aren't telling us? I know that depleted uranium is a death sentence for all of us. We will all die in silent ways.
To learn more:
Sources used in this story that readers are encouraged to consult:
American Free Press four-part series on DU by Christopher Bollyn.
o Part I: "Depleted Uranium: U.S. Commits War Crime Against Iraq, Humanity," 8 Aug 2004;
o Part II: "Cancer Epidemic Caused by U.S. WMD: MD Says Depleted Uranium Definitively Linked, 13 Aug 2004"
o Part III: "DU Syndrome Stricken Vets Denied Care: Pentagon Hides DU Dangers to Deny Medical Care to Vets" 21 Aug 2004,
o Part IV: "Pentagon Brass Suppresses Truth About Toxic Weapons: Poisonous Uranium Munitions Threaten World" 28 Aug 2004,
* August 2004 World Affairs Journal. Leuren Moret: "Depleted Uranium: The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War,"
* August 2004 Coastal Post Online. Carol Sterrit: "Marin Depleted Uranium Resolution Heats Up - GI's Will Come Home To A Slow Death,"
* World Depleted Uranium Weapons Conference, Hamburg, Germany, October 16-19, 2004
* International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan. Written opinion of Judge Niloufer Baghwat
* "Discounted Casualties: The Human Cost of Nuclear War" by Akira Tashiro, foreword by Leuren Moret
Leuren Moret is a geoscientist who has worked around the world on radiation issues, educating citizens, the media, members of parliaments and Congress and other officials. She became a whistleblower in 1991 at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab after experiencing major science fraud on the Yucca Mountain Project. An environmental commissioner in the City of Berkeley, she can be reached at leurenmoret (at) yahoo.com.
Comments
Hide the following 13 comments
DU
04.10.2006 18:56
Hi lauren,
Very interesting and accurate information on DU. The pictures you used are deeply moving and show the genuine horror of what Depleted Uranium is doing to the Iraqi children.
best,
Roger
Roger Hellraiser
bollocks, bollocks, and more bollocks
04.10.2006 20:52
First we start off with the gruesome, get your flesh creeping, pictures. Doesn't say where they come from, though. Now, five years after Gulf War II, you'd expect more and more of these children to be born. Have you heard about it? Been reported in any medical journals? No? Didn't think so.
Then we get the wonderful statement: 'Vietnam was a chemical war for oil' oil? In Vietnam? In 1964?What has the author been smoking? Can I have some, please?
It also bears the hallmark of 'black' propaganda? How do you really want to scare the shit out of people? Servicemen in particular? Why, by telling them that if they fuck their wives, they're going to give them cancer.
'Not only were soldiers exposed to DU on and off the battlefields, but they brought it home. DU in the semen of soldiers internally contaminated their wives, partners and girlfriends. Tragically, some women in their 20s and 30s who were sexual partners of exposed soldiers developed endometriosis and were forced to have hysterectomies because of health problems.
'In a group of 251 soldiers from a study group in Mississippi who had all had normal babies before the Gulf War, 67 percent of their post-war babies were born with severe birth defects. They were born with missing legs, arms, organs or eyes or had immune system and blood diseases. In some veterans' families now, the only normal or healthy members of the family are the children born before the war.'
Study group? I defy the author of the paper, or anyone else, to produce an article from a peer reviewed health journal that bears out any of the statements in the paragraphs above.
sceptic
Takashi Morizumi
04.10.2006 22:04
First of all, to answer your first question, the photos were taken by Takashi Morizumi, a Japanese photographer who spent time in Iraq following the studies of the effects of depleted uranium. How do I know? I met him at the World Uranium Weapons Conference in Hamburg in October 2003.
To answer some of your remaining questions, perhaps the lack of current information about the effects of DU from the latest combat in Iraq might have something to do with the fact that the same people who were responsible for using DU weapons are pretty much throttling any objective information from getting out of Iraq.
I cannot vouch for any study groups but I know for a fact that the figures quoted are widely accepted outside government offices and even then there are government agency officials who believe the figures to be accurate. Perhaps you should make your own investigation before you make blanket dismissals. Why not contact Chris Busby?
http://www.cerrie.org/people/busby.php
http://www.llrc.org/misc/subtopic/cv.htm
The New Toxic Avenger
DU
04.10.2006 23:32
Similarly, any effects that might be happening in Iraq should also be happening in the Balkans. If there is a cover up in Iraq, there won't be in Serbia.
The figures might or might not be accepted, but they are very precise. Why have they not been published in a peer reviewed journal? Or, if they have, give us a reference. And don't give me crap about censorship - the Lancet managed to publish a nice bit of disinformation not exactly favourable to the powers that be.
sceptic
Breakfast
05.10.2006 14:47
Like I said, perhaps you should address your scepticism to an expert like Dr. Chris Busby or Dr. Doug Rokke.
An MOD official, in a Gummeresque way, was quoted as saying that he would be happy to have DU sprinkled on his breakfast. I wonder if you would, 'sceptic'...
The New Toxic Avenger
Would I sprinkle it on my breakfast?
05.10.2006 18:04
Busby and Rokke are irrelevant to this: what I want to know is where the poster gets his 'facts' and 'figures'. Because I think they are invented.
sceptic
Bush Flash - Eric Blumrich
05.10.2006 20:00
I don't know how you can ask that question and then say that Doug Rokke and Chris Busby are irrelevent - they are two of the main researchers into the effects of DU.
The figures have been around for years and you will find them in this widely distributed animation by Eric Blumrich @ bushflash.com - why not ask him as well?
http://www.bushflash.com/pl_hi.html
Incidentally, I doubt the poster of this message is really Leuren Moret. She lives and works in the US and I suspect somebody has spoofed her identity to post this article.
No, you wouldn't sprinkle it on your breakfast but in a gesture to supposedly prove its safety, an MOD spokesperson in a rather idiotic statement said he would - though I doubt he would ever be expected to do so.
The New Toxic Avenger
another wonderful piece of disinformation
05.10.2006 21:04
More pictures of deformed children. Well, we can all find those, and post them on a website, and say, 'Look! Here's proof!' It's not. it's bollocks. You mean to tell me that after 15 years or so, no one in the medical profession has noticed any of this stuff? Get real!
Why are Bokker et al irrelevant? Because the article quotes 'facts' and 'figures'. And, as I said, I defy Bokke or Busby to track down these 'studies'. And if they do find them , I'll bet you they won't be in a peer reviewed medical journal.
sceptic
Some info
06.10.2006 09:10
The type of ammo used n the Balkans was chiefly 30mm DU penetrators fired from A10s, it totalled around 14 tonnes, however most of these missed their targets and became embedded in the ground. Unless you get a hard target impact, DU dust doesn't form and subsequently spread. However, as UNEP admitted there could well be problems with groundwater contamination and because of this, the Serbian authroities have begun a program of removing contaminated soils.
Iraq
The case for a causal link between birth defects and DU is far from proven, in spite of this they have become a cheerleader for the campaign. What is clearer is that there has been a rise in some cancers. The International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons and IPPNW are currently supporting the first ever civilian epidemiology survey in Basra and the initial findings suggest a 1.4x increase in solid cancers. The project is still only halfway to completion though and as you might expect, the conditions on the ground do not make research any easier. Iraqi physicians are in the process of constructing a reliable cancer registry and once that is done they will examine where DU fits into other environmental risk factors.
US Vets
I've spent months looking for the study that Moret quotes and have been unable to find it anywhere in the literature. The DU issue seems to trigger a very unfortunate hashing of campaign work and 'science'. It does the cause a great disservice.
However, there is growing evidence that DU can cause many of the health problems it is accused of, from direct DNA damage to immune system supression through chemical toxicity and radioactivity. However further research is needed into the precise biological mechanisms involved. It is also clear that the ICRP's safety standards from internal radioactive emitters need reassessing in the light of recent advances in our understanding of low level radiation.
CADU
Baby Bird
06.10.2006 09:22
Perhaps it is worthwhile contacting either Doug Rokke or Chris Busby because they almost certainly contributed to the study you are ranting about.
Now, if you don't want to bother doing that and want top carry on mouthing off about where the study came from and where the photos came from and ignore all attempts to answer your questions then that's fine. You can stay in this little room and shout all day long because you won't be bothering anybody. Conversely, you could make a bit of effort on your own part and contact Takashi Morizumi and ask him about his photos. Or you could put your questions to two scientists who have written the report and probably have answers to your questions.
Until you do so, don't expect any further contributions from me.
The New Toxic Avenger
'who have written the report'
06.10.2006 11:42
To quote CADU: 'I've spent months looking for the study that Moret quotes and have been unable to find it anywhere in the literature.'
My personal view is that they are invented.
sceptic
that study...
06.10.2006 12:48
This may be of interest:
What are the risks of DU to human health?
There are three chief hazards associated with DU: its chemical toxicity, radioactivity and the effects of fine metal particles, or fumes, on the body. Both of these hazardous properties are exacerbated by the fact that DU is pyrophoric. A pyrophoric material is one that oxidizes rapidly and can burst into flame at low temperatures in the proximity of oxygen. As the projectile hits a hard target, the DU burns at temperatures of between 3000°C and 6000°C. As it oxidizes, it turns into a fine dust, which can be blown for long distances from the place of the impact; this dust can then be inhaled by soldiers and civilians alike.
We do not as yet understand the full impact that fine particles of DU oxide may have on the human body. We do not have an accurate internal dose assessment; we have little information on the precise distribution and dynamics of internalised particles, and we are still lacking a complete understanding of the mechanisms by which damage to cells and organs occurs. Despite this, there is mounting scientific evidence from both animal, and in vitro studies that suggest deleterious effects on human health from inhaled DU particles.
Animal and cellular studies have shown clear evidence of the carcinogenic (transforming healthy cells into cancerous ones), neurotoxic and immuno-toxic effects of DU (the immune system defends the body from Infections and even some types of cancerous cells); as well as its ability to damage the reproductive system and foetus (which may cause birth defects). Some data also suggests that uranium can directly damage the DNA and enzyme proteins in living cells. Many scientific and medical papers on the chemical and radiological toxicities of uranium have been published.
Assessing the precise mechanisms by which DU may damage the human body Is made more difficult because both Its chemical toxicity and radioactivity can cause similar effects, such as the generation of free radicals within the body.
CADU
Wakeup!
14.10.2006 10:47
A five year old would be rolling around the floor in laughter at this comment...LOL!
"her work does not appear in peer reviewed jounals"
OF course it does'nt you clod ! The info is too HOT and is rejected by the journals.
PLEASE GROW UP !
On the positive side I have seen research that suggests that there are supressed
physics that can help in the clear up of this radioactivity....still researching.
NOT THAT THIS EXCUSES THEIR SICKNESS IN ANY WAY WHAT SO EVER.
I'm just looking for a bit of hope here.
The Oracle
The Oracle