The desperation of the creeping coup to copy the example of "colleagues" in the USA (or is that criminal collaborators - or even puppet-puppeteers*) - to create a securitypolice/intel CENTRAL" has meant a very new con cept has got into the language.
"we need a radical step. . .we need a seamless approach to the seamless threat . . . to prevent radicalisation"....
"we need a radical step. . .we need a seamless approach to the seamless threat . . . to prevent radicalisation"....
- seamless terrorism
AFTER 911 - in fact, by 9/12 - the ex-chief of the ci a was exhibiting VERY woolley thinking by saying that 9/11 meant we need to develop the tech+tech of "humint", then create a "terror tsar" to whisper his version of everything into the ear of the "Chief"- dragging all the input together - avoiding checking - (as the odd, new"OSP" did - in such a disastrous way - see recent report ) , also shifting people into SpaceComms old place - etc - as the SAT-tech (etc) got a boost under a myriad of other (cost plus percentage) budgets - then, ALSO - for some mysterious reason, saying 9/11 was due to a LACK of humint - so it meant we need to increase the pressure of the tech+tech of humint "modernisation" , to put humint into the global equation . . . .
Odd, when BLT mightnt have got away in 98 when that african government had its offer to extradite him open to the USA government fail due to the "humint" of a certain arm of the USAs "intel" ( - but perhaps of others too - perhaps of a minderbinderesque nature????) . ( "A.A. Mohamed" - out of fort bragg - ex-egypt intel - bits of his record accessible due to the "PBS" websites FOIA ).(witness statement for prosecution in trial also accessible ).
The foundations with afghan interests interests as much as the iraqi expat intel from other institutes fed into "OSP", but its funny the way a few "free market" types seem towant to put all the eggs in a single basket - or is that funny the way a couple of rotten apples want all the other apples . . . .
Perhaps its ironic the way that the ministers same speech mentions that a centre specialising in slave trafficking is opening next week.
WHAT THE HECK IS "SEAMLESS TERRORISM"?
The "war of err err err errorism" looks dodgier all the time.
AFTER 911 - in fact, by 9/12 - the ex-chief of the ci a was exhibiting VERY woolley thinking by saying that 9/11 meant we need to develop the tech+tech of "humint", then create a "terror tsar" to whisper his version of everything into the ear of the "Chief"- dragging all the input together - avoiding checking - (as the odd, new"OSP" did - in such a disastrous way - see recent report ) , also shifting people into SpaceComms old place - etc - as the SAT-tech (etc) got a boost under a myriad of other (cost plus percentage) budgets - then, ALSO - for some mysterious reason, saying 9/11 was due to a LACK of humint - so it meant we need to increase the pressure of the tech+tech of humint "modernisation" , to put humint into the global equation . . . .
Odd, when BLT mightnt have got away in 98 when that african government had its offer to extradite him open to the USA government fail due to the "humint" of a certain arm of the USAs "intel" ( - but perhaps of others too - perhaps of a minderbinderesque nature????) . ( "A.A. Mohamed" - out of fort bragg - ex-egypt intel - bits of his record accessible due to the "PBS" websites FOIA ).(witness statement for prosecution in trial also accessible ).
The foundations with afghan interests interests as much as the iraqi expat intel from other institutes fed into "OSP", but its funny the way a few "free market" types seem towant to put all the eggs in a single basket - or is that funny the way a couple of rotten apples want all the other apples . . . .
Perhaps its ironic the way that the ministers same speech mentions that a centre specialising in slave trafficking is opening next week.
WHAT THE HECK IS "SEAMLESS TERRORISM"?
The "war of err err err errorism" looks dodgier all the time.
Comments
Display the following comment