“The story of the Jersey widows and their struggle for the truth deserves to be heard.”
Larisa Alexandrovna, RawStory.com
“An astonishing portrayal of the lengths our public servants will go to in order to protect themselves from any accountability.”
Scott Horton, Antiwar.com
Larisa Alexandrovna, RawStory.com
“An astonishing portrayal of the lengths our public servants will go to in order to protect themselves from any accountability.”
Scott Horton, Antiwar.com
Kleinberg/Van Auken Review of the 9/11 Report
Most Family Steering Committee Questions Unanswered or Inadequately Addressed by 9/11 Commission
Originally released in October of 2004 as part of the Justice for 9/11 Complaint filed with NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, their report is to be re-released at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. at 11AM on September 11th by the producers of 9/11: Press for Truth.
This review of the 9/11 Report was conducted by Jersey widows and Family Steering Committee Members Lorie Van Auken and Mindy Kleinberg late in 2004. They are two of the four who came to be known as the “Jersey Girls” and are featured in the recently released documentary, 9/11: Press for Truth where they discuss the fact that approximately 70% of questions posed by the 12 member 9/11 Family Steering Committee were not answered or adequately addressed by the 9/11 Commission in its final report.
Download the report.
http://911pressfortruth.com/file_download/11
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
Allegations Brought to Inspectors General
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300_pf.html
By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 2, 2006; A03
Item begins....
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said....
Most Family Steering Committee Questions Unanswered or Inadequately Addressed by 9/11 Commission
Originally released in October of 2004 as part of the Justice for 9/11 Complaint filed with NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, their report is to be re-released at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. at 11AM on September 11th by the producers of 9/11: Press for Truth.
This review of the 9/11 Report was conducted by Jersey widows and Family Steering Committee Members Lorie Van Auken and Mindy Kleinberg late in 2004. They are two of the four who came to be known as the “Jersey Girls” and are featured in the recently released documentary, 9/11: Press for Truth where they discuss the fact that approximately 70% of questions posed by the 12 member 9/11 Family Steering Committee were not answered or adequately addressed by the 9/11 Commission in its final report.
Download the report.
http://911pressfortruth.com/file_download/11 9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
Allegations Brought to Inspectors General
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300_pf.html By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 2, 2006; A03
Item begins....
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said....
Homepage:
Comments
Display the following 2 comments