9/11 INSIDE JOB, where are our academics on 7/7?

So the UK is catching up with the rest of Europe and the US in terms of the media coverage of 9/11 truth...

In additon to the Hate Mail article the Gruniad ran this yesterday:

Who really blew up the twin towers?
As the fifth anniversary of 9/11 nears, Christina Asquith finds academics querying the official version of events
Tuesday September 5, 2006
 http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1864524,00.html

And some local rags are reporting on local truth campaigns:

'OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY CHALLENGED
A GROUP of Sussex people – concerned at 'anomalies' surrounding the official story of the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 – have invited the chairman of the Britain and Ireland 9/11 Truth Campaign to give a presentation at All Saints, Lewes, on Tuesday, September 5.
 http://www.seafordtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=509&ArticleID=1741597

And David Ray Griffin is on Heaven and Earth on BBC1 Sunday 10:00am - 11:00am to, no doubt, talk about his book, "Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11" that has been rejected by Amazon in the US
 http://www.911blogger.com/node/2479

Though it is available in the UK:

 http://www.amazon.co.uk/Christian-Faith-Truth-Behind-Reflection/dp/0664231179/

The 'scholars for truth' have been confusing people with the 'explosives in towers'/'wtc 7 pulled'/'missile hit the pentagon' rubbish for far too long. Their speculation is very damaging, albeit not as harmful as the speculation that 'Osama did it'.
The real scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have almost all the answers:

 http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

The earlier full report is up there too -  http://wtc.nist.gov - however, the FAQ tells you all you need to know when it comes to debunking the idle 'scholars' speculation. That said, the NIST reports do not answer the question regarding whom it was that was piloting those planes. Note that 757/767's are not 'fly by wire', and that it was 757/767 planes that were hijacked that day, not 777's or Airbus, i.e. 'fly by wire' planes.

Here are a few statements of fact regarding that day:

9/11 was the opening day of the DSEi arms-trade fair in London's Docklands.

The first people to speculate that it was 'the bloke in a cave' worked for Jane's Information Group - the same company that promoted that arms-trade fair.

When it comes to showing some care and consideration for all those that had their lives ruined or lost on that day, you might want to ask whom it really was that sabotaged the Pentagon (arms) and pulled down the World Trade Centre (trade), on that very opening day of that arms-trade fair. You might also want to wonder why it was that the 'aviation experts' from Jane's Information Group failed to mention threats made in advance by the small, 'insurrectionary' group 'disarm-DSEi' to disarm the arms-traders on that very day.

Thankyou.

Many companies benefited from the 9/11 "attack". One company, an armstrader named Raytheon, saw its stock saw immediately after the attack. One of their best customers is the CIA . For further details visit www.911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html

For those of you who've not yet seen it, heres an interesting film regarding the 9/11 "attack". http://www.loosechange911.com/

On 7 June, 2001 the UK 'Labour' government secured a second election victory, losing only six seats overall since the 1997 election. Tony Blair was due to present a speech to the conference of the Trade Unions Congress (TUC) on September 11, 2001. The unions had become increasingly angered by Tony Blair's actions and somewhat of a showdown was expected. From the unions' perspective, having helped elect Tory Bliar and the 'Labour' government, they expected some benefit. The unions and the Labour Party had always been on the same side. What had happened? They might have felt that the Labour Party had been hijacked and now they wanted it back.

Blair addressed the TUC conference along the lines of "Can't stop. There have been terrible atrocities in the States. Got to go."

Blair did not address the TUC conference again until September 2004 having been busy arranging chaos and disaster in the Middle East. With an election expected in May 2005, the unions' hands were tied. "I'm back", says Blair, smiling.

Could Blair have survived without these wars based on lies? I think not.