©Muhammad Haque/AADHIKARonline 2006

Yet another rant from M Haque accusing an organisation of being part of an evil racist plot.

I'm not disputing that the BBC or the Daily Mail aren't whatever you are claiming they are.

But could you provide some evidence, or direct examples to back it up? Otherwise it just looks like you're making up this stuff from the top of your head.

What specifically has George Alagiah said that's upset you?

His comments in The Daily Mail (which you haven't bothered to quote) included: "I'm convinced the answer lies not in getting rid of multiculturalism altogether, still less in trying to end the diverse flow of people to Britain, but in trying to resurrect its original goal - the mixing of people of different races on an equal footing."

He then goes on to complain that not enough is being done to help young Asian people in the UK from feeling disenfranchised.

I'm guessing from previous posts that you're based in Tower Hamlets. Was it his suggestion that some of the after-school projects in the area, such as after-school Bengali lessons, might be counter-productive to community cohesion?

I'm trying to be helpful here.

norville b
please stop
botherin' me
cant u see
the truth
tho i dont drink
pepsi
i sometimes do
coke
and i have been known to
toke
and it aint no joke
i like ladies and blokes
so dont attack
mohammed haque
no guardianista
get pista
daily mail or bbc
well, wait and see.

This is the first chance I have to make a brief comment following my post about the BBC and the Daily Mail teaming up.

I shall leave for now any follow-up comments about the role that Ruth Kelly has been assigned to perform in reviving for the benefit of the Blairing regime the spectre of a ‘ethnically worrying problem’.

The fact that George Alagiah may have been quoted as suggesting some apparently positive things, does NOT counter the Impression that the teaming up has created. That of attacking the idea of a pluralistic, multicultural broadly pro-civilising society.

If you want to trade quotations, it can be done but it will take up far too much space than would be available here.

What the Daily Mail did on Monday of this week [21 August 2006] was to give the front page splash to a slogan that totally sinks to oblivion any remote suggestion for tolerant society.

The record [that which can be checked in the libraries] of the Daily Mail is one of opposition to a tolerant society. That is the worrying thing. It has now revived that pattern which it stuck to and created over the previous 70 years [during when its title changed - the tag Daily Mail is not from its earlier days].

It is well know that the Daily Mail [and to be accurate, the Times, now controlled by Blaring Rupert Murdoch] was one of the appeasers of Adolf Hitler and his party.

What has happened over the Stephen Lawrence murder is that of all the current London-based ‘British' 'national' ‘dailies, the Daily mail has played a phenomenally posturing trick by appearing to print on its front page ‘MURDERERS’ with the photographs of a group of individual it has repeatedly claimed are the real murderers of the youth.

This has been exceedingly diversionary in creating the impression that the Daily Mail is, after all, a publication that is ‘for’ everything that a multiracial, multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society should be like.

That is a carefully crafted stunt the full details of which are as yet not in the public domains.

But the real role of the Daily Mail has been to oppose a tolerant society, especially to oppose one where people from other continents and backgrounds other than Western Europe are included.

The Daily Mail is the official daily print and now internet organ for the most persistewnt spreaders of racist venom and intolerance.

It is through that publication that the favourite pro-racist surrogates have been launched as being ‘sensible blacks’ or 'sensible ethnics’.


The4 list is very long and the impact has been very bad for the cause of a tolerant, pro-democratic society.

As for my ‘location’, that I don’t need to be located anywhere in particular to have an idea or an ideological position.

By the way, I knew of a shallow, phoney, wanna be journalist called George Alagiah a long while back.

And I told him that he was gouging to cause problems by lying for the racists and fabricators.

Whatever he may have been reported as saying about ‘Bengali’ and ‘Tower Hamlets’, is not what I am commenting about here.

The Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets speak Seelotee. Not Bengali.


And nothing that the local council in Tower Hamlets has done by way of educational service has been addressing any serious side of education. But that is a topic on which I would address Ruth Kelly’s ‘ex cabinet secretary for education’ ‘mind’ on another occasion.

My point about the Daily Mail and the BBC addresses wider space than 'Norville's'



This is the first chance I have to make a brief comment following my post about the BBC and the Daily Mail teaming up.

I shall leave for now any follow-up comments about the role that Ruth Kelly has been assigned to perform in reviving for the benefit of the Blairing regime the spectre of a ‘ethnically worrying problem’.

The fact that George Alagiah may have been quoted as suggesting some apparently positive things, does NOT counter the Impression that the teaming up has created. That of attacking the idea of a pluralistic, multicultural broadly pro-civilising society.

If you want to trade quotations, it can be done but it will take up far too much space than would be available here.

What the Daily Mail did on Monday of this week [21 August 2006] was to give the front page splash to a slogan that totally sinks to oblivion any remote suggestion for tolerant society.

The record [that which can be checked in the libraries] of the Daily Mail is one of opposition to a tolerant society. That is the worrying thing. It has now revived that pattern which it stuck to and created over the previous 70 years [during when its title changed - the tag Daily Mail is not from its earlier days].

It is well know that the Daily Mail [and to be accurate, the Times, now controlled by Blaring Rupert Murdoch] was one of the appeasers of Adolf Hitler and his party.

What has happened over the Stephen Lawrence murder is that of all the current London-based ‘British' 'national' ‘dailies, the Daily mail has played a phenomenally posturing trick by appearing to print on its front page ‘MURDERERS’ with the photographs of a group of individual it has repeatedly claimed are the real murderers of the youth.

This has been exceedingly diversionary in creating the impression that the Daily Mail is, after all, a publication that is ‘for’ everything that a multiracial, multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society should be like.

That is a carefully crafted stunt the full details of which are as yet not in the public domains.

But the real role of the Daily Mail has been to oppose a tolerant society, especially to oppose one where people from other continents and backgrounds other than Western Europe are included.

The Daily Mail is the official daily print and now internet organ for the most persistewnt spreaders of racist venom and intolerance.

It is through that publication that the favourite pro-racist surrogates have been launched as being ‘sensible blacks’ or 'sensible ethnics’.


The4 list is very long and the impact has been very bad for the cause of a tolerant, pro-democratic society.

As for my ‘location’, that I don’t need to be located anywhere in particular to have an idea or an ideological position.

By the way, I knew of a shallow, phoney, wanna be journalist called George Alagiah a long while back.

And I told him that he was gouging to cause problems by lying for the racists and fabricators.

Whatever he may have been reported as saying about ‘Bengali’ and ‘Tower Hamlets’, is not what I am commenting about here.

The Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets speak Seelotee. Not Bengali.


And nothing that the local council in Tower Hamlets has done by way of educational service has been addressing any serious side of education. But that is a topic on which I would address Ruth Kelly’s ‘ex cabinet secretary for education’ ‘mind’ on another occasion.

View part of the exclusive report


 http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnow/today.html

m haque,

you above poem suggests you are bisexual " i do ladies and blokes". is this correct? are you going to champion gay muslims? i think this poetry is on the right line, very brave of you.... also, i would cut down on the coke, but carry on toking, as coke will mess you up... anyway, best of luck.

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street

Demonstration against Crossrail exhibition of lies
Assemble at 2.30 PM

Friday 22 September 2006
Outside Brady Centre
Hanbury Street
London E1

Demo starts at 3PM
against Crossrail propaganda
being staged in Brady Centre

The PRISM disclosures have shown that you were right so many years ago to say what you said.