This version posted on the indymedia site at 0820 Hrs GMT
Thursday 16 February 2006
Crossrail hole Council in Tower Hamkest in desperate bid to cling on to power
Who conned UK Crossrail hole Bill Minister Alistair into making a secret, creepy trip to the Brick Lane area?
This question goes to the heart of the battle to defend the Brick Lane London E1 area against the Crossrail hole attacks. And against the Blairing cabal that has been in control of the key resources and the powers of the local Tower Hamlets Council as far as those have been applied in relation to the relevance of the Crossrail hole programme aimed at decimating the Brick Lane London e1 area and other parts of the ordinary Tower Hamlets.
It is that cabal of self-serving, reactionary, ultra-careerists that has defied local democracy, has practically disenfranchised the voice of the people on the formally elected Tower Hamlets Council
This is the question that is being publicly put to Alistair Darling by Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane London E1 area campaign against the Crossrail hole.
This follows our coming across additional evidence of how the name and the remit of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council were again abused by the unaccountable cabal who wanted to keep pushing for the Crossrail hole plans at a secret meeting they staged for Alistair Darling to be seen in posed dialogues with the community.
Why?
Why was Alistair Darling in the area?
The answer includes the fact that only days before darling made the secret trip, khoodeelaar organiser mUHAMMAD haque disclosed evidence to a campaign against the crossrail hole meeting that showed that Alistair darling was involved in shielding the corrupt clique that is controlling the tower hamlets council. muhammad haque exclusively showed the meeting documentation that Darling’s department for transport (dft) had been engaged in undermining the rights of the local community in tower hamlets in London’s east end and in protecting the corrupt clique on the tower hamlets council which the government was using as an instrument to push through the crossrail hole plan in the area.
According to details KHOODEELAARonline gathered on Wednesday 15 February the secret Alistair Darling meeting was organised by the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets council. That was to muddy the waters and to create a fake scenario suggesting that the Khoodeelaar movement against the Crossrail hole attack on the community is smaller than it is.
That strategy is a product of the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council. That clique is desperate to cling on to power after the scheduled council elections in May 2006.
That they are desperate cannot be a secret though.
Every day evidence is emerging in the Brick Lane London E1 area of the meltdown occurring within the Blairing clique that controls the Tower Hamlets Council. In the past 25 months, Khoodeelaar has published evidence of the lies that that clique has been telling as part of the clique’s service to the Crossrail hole interest and against the interest of democracy and against the safety of the local community.
Three members of the current Tower Hamlets Council, all elected as Labour Party candidates, have referred to evidence of how anti-social, how anti-democratic the Blairing clique has been. They have promised to disclose further details of how corrupt and undemocratic the Tower Hamlets Council is. This they have said will be done nearer to the May 2006 polls for a new Council in Tower Hamlets. Some of these councillors are expected to stand as independents against their former Labour Party colleagues. "We are doing this to help the local community rid itself of the corrupt clique”, said a supporter of the three former Labour Party councillors
However, Khoodeelaar is NOT taken in by anything any member of the Blaired Tower Hamlets Council has to say. We have not heard anything yet that any of the reportedly rebellious former Labour Party councillors has any more commitment to the defence of the community than is applicable to the current Crossrail-hole-Council leader Michael Keith 'has'. [To be continued]
Comments
Display the following comment