Trouncing the Demon Bush Cabal

Trouncing the Demon Bush Cabal

Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal matters, Legal Aid
is not required to lend assistance on the grounds that I'm not co-operating with
the system as it operates through professional Barred representations. [I am
eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of assistance I am
requesting] Considering the complexity of my judicial matter, I would request
legal assistance from the Court in these following areas.

1. National Security Issues

I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our national
security services are obligated to practice under, to insure our national
security matters are being truly defended in my respect. No change in summation
of my character was altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify
it was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers denied their rights
to speak freely, then as the Court knows, instead of doing what they argued to
grant such privilege to infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than
perfect law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored no
criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on the rights of any
child. For I challenge; it does not serve Canada's interest (in particular our
teen soldiers) to knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious
failures of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting cry to
hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with evidence and everything,
President Bush's business partner, (who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working
on the top secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin
pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing children - done all
for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's
"mastermind" "ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have
notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried employees, have
done practically nothing to serve Canada's interest in this respect. While
Canada's CSIS does not have the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding
the criminal transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature of
CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with by trying. A CSIS
officer told me, many were completely aware of President Bush's criminality
regarding his hugely treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do
practically nothing about it outside of filing the reports with the federal
government, or maybe anonymously sending something to CBC, with no promises that
anyone would actually read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags
contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his friends in the
ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine as a threat to all of Canada's
Honorable police officers and Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's
appointed head of the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is
genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take a stand on this
issue, [if he even received said reports] on behalf of honorable police officers
and soldiers everywhere, in defense of the human race, risking everything,
considering he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians where
he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids to war for whatever
Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg ("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the
public assets so let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know
the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top secret reason they
have not perused Justice for the sake of Canadian soldiers who bravely put their
lives on the line, of which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian
would tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide for
themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few Canadians have died
thus far, but when will the sacrifice of Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon
to be Iranians with the Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries
officially marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bushite terrorists, be
more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly reported repeatedly in European
press, Mr. Sattler ordered the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as
first strike targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely"
report that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal more from America
in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's command, they proceeded to
monstrously murder more than two hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering
the region in radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a
scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth is what un-
arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all living things. God included. An
aside: Did you know the commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'
Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took up the job at the
request of the Bush junta, and subsequently left near 170 tons of plastic
explosives unprotected for looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he
commanded to leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad, with,
I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he replied, he just wanted to let
us know he was there. "We just wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In
Basra, the coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 130 known
weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con peenacker gang can't
steal everything without a stupid man war going. Left continuing unattended
without national discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent victims
of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that instead of me seeking to find
where it is written, that the RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine
eleven, perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national CBC radio
forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international press release acknowledging
briefly our failures to communicate in the past, and politely request where
Canada could go through open line discussions on these very serious matters. We
must not allow our soldiers to be made misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to
bravely with honor, defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to
consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP spokesperson?, a
paid consultant for my expertise in recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll
go out there, and win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we
stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war criminals, we all will be
the better for it. Now, take me to your leader.

2. Local Police Issues

As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the previous motions,
through considering the charge that was brought against me, (where no criminal
intent in alleged, and nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is
already at least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still without
my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child exploitation unit is not
operating in a manner that would effectually reduce the proliferation of truly
illegal materials. They have included images to demonize me that they must know
are left legal to distribute, or for those couple images categorized as for
sure illegal unto themselves, are left publicly unhindered when it comes to
Police questioning in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.
Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously operating in a
nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer gears to sell as sadomasochists
who enjoy seeing lovers of life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but
come on, something seriously needs to be done in how things there are run. I
believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal fears officers have of the
information universe; for to acknowledge information sharing through p2p
networks or Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the score
going corporately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty for high treason in God's
America for example, Iraqi church goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers,
women raped by "freedom fighting" GIs, the sex slave trade, or that VLT's are
being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4) with a math game
scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but not the "Free Press" editor, or
commercial savvy CJOB's --------. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our
dying universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know he's
guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to formulate their own
conclusions through our media on why we have laws. Anyway, I need to have some
one to cross check the "illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to
see which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what if any
attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found providers. I suspect many
providers they would claim they can't do anything about, are so not because a
crime is occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal conduct
would be required before an internet provider, server, or site owner could be
recommended for censorship. Not this, twenty year olds look like they could be
ten year olds, or that, simply naked children being human should not be viewed
in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.

To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain transparently coded
checksum program checker to automatically recognize, known illegal materials
made available free, with a downloadable database updated by the work of one or
two officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic -
classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the country. This
action is good to take despite my personal innocence or fraudulent guilt, for
media labelings are completely impossible to designate content/control, but as
such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where possibly actual
hugely offensive content is being distributed through. With volunteer co-
operation of programming, a user, server, or internet service provider could
be warned of material almost in their possession as expression is classified
criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on. I'm confident such Police
planning with open for public appeals to fine tune further, would end putting
the hugely profitable exploitation units across the continent almost completely
out of business. Now, who truly wants that?

3. Constitutional Challenges

This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto guilty to lose all
their stolen computer gear through fraudulent demonization of the innocent
included, is a for sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public
inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is needing to locate
only a small few arguably illegal depictions, then trumping up a lot of
fraudulent totals. Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting
individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when witnessed, people
might begin to ask, just how much money is the unit taking in sold stolen
merchandise? Perhaps 50,000 dollars in a single case where the business owner of
said stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense! No troublesome
Court appearance required to protect your public business image even! Generally,
in cases that do reach trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts,
and at the "professional" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a small sample
is only offered. [The professional naked people person they have in my case I
suspect is lost somewhere in bushville as the clinically insane, or just
extremely helpful to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has
worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense wouldn't generally see
a connection. For only one freely available image that you couldn't see until
you already had it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian, in
prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such convictions insist
irrationally that the guilty must also be sexually deviant and require
professional counseling. The law enforced absent criminal intent needs to be
Constitutionally challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as
being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual assault for
comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault that was never truly made?] So,
as a result, I need the assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide
me consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant Constitutional
questions regarding this specific challenge. And maybe co-operation with the
Crown or Police chief to tally records and total sales figures on cases under
similar circumstances to consider the exploitation unit for re-evaluation.
[Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance argument given by all similar units,
is that nothing can be securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently
ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have a real hidden
problem here regarding their/our intelligence gathering capabilities.] While
maybe supporting public discussions on how to even improve further, the
valuable work that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere I'm
sure to operate for our interests. We may together have to overthrow CJOB with
our human skills at demanding some space to talk about bettering our lives by
communicating without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening up
the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much from us as the
clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so who's talk radio station is it anyway?

4. The Crown's Crown

I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our community asks a Crown
to bravely achieve. One, would be to pursue Justice for the principled
betterment of our society. It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our
corporate media managers have decided for one fear or another, that such noble
reaches must be left from the grasp of Canadian soldiers and their loving giving
families. This place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be
treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had murdered in America
under these left silenced demands for a true accounting by good police work
completed already. The fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when
proudly defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus far, absent
in support of Justice for Johnny. When I read statements from the Crown stating,
John's legal arguments against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown
hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an unjust and blind
totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted uncertainty is forsaking the
innocent lives of Bush's continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown
has a responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely suspect I
don't hold the best of intentions towards life with everything I am. However,
the Crown's summations of my character will never change the official FBI's
conclusions arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real murder
scene, to discover who personally is still escaping arrest for mass murder of
our good friends in New York City on 9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators
obviously faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate continuous
failures by our Crown to serve our public interest. For whatever reason, my case
documents a corporate news agenda of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice
for ourselves as the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all
Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC standards. Canada
is being left not defending honorable American police officers, doing their jobs
to the best of their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown
unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our names.) So, I would
ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out for Canada, while fighting to silence
my cries with an unjust as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for
obstructing Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of
first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this... I'm not sure. Perhaps the
Court's assistance of aid in the form of one or two Crown offices from a
different province in Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm
more up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has tricked my
nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into excepting Canadians can not
hear the silenced screams of global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need
to die for Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be Canada,
a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal Justice always. Just ask
US.

Your Friend,

John W.

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN W.

I, JOHN W., in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.

The facts articulated in the accompanying motion, the Seeking of Friends Amicus Curiae Application,
contain I swear only facts as I know them, and the legal positions I wish to obtain assistance from our
court, are listed there by numbered statement also..

2.

The two lawyers I’ve had previously representing myself through Legal Aid, I parted company with
under amicable terms. Mr. S-------, a great lawyer and friend who over the course of my case,
moved himself into a private practice where the money was much better. Mr. F-------, a quick on his
toes, knowledgeable lawyer, who I’m sure adequately represents his numerous clients with the utmost
professionalism and skill, found after reviewing with myself this complicated criminal matter an
understanding on how I would like to progress, found both of us comfortably agreeing, that I would
be better to go at this on my own discretion as self represented.

3.

I used to do a fair amount of extra work in Hollywood movies out of Winnipeg up until
about six months ago, and I’ve performed principally in no less than thirty theatrical productions over
the years in our fair city, but work for me in that respect has since dried up. I take the odd jobs here
and there when I can, and have a small part time job lined up assisting in the transcription of letters
that will be part of a book soon to be published.

4.

I spoke to the Executive Director of Legal Aid by phone, and he confirmed Legal Aid’s stance that I
received by letter on self defended individuals. In a complicated case such as mine, I would need to
make a direct appeal through a Court motion for Judicial assistance.

5.

It was Constable C-------, who during the preliminary, told the Court of the business owner, who by
committing no criminal offense, needed to make costly legal efforts if he ever thought he could
expect his computer equipment to be returned without a fight from those who had plans to sell it all to
the highest bidder. It was an employee, at the company with thousands of dollars in computer
equipment they nabbed, under perhaps legitimate circumstances, or perhaps not. Unjust laws make for
good cops gone awry.

6.

I have seen the Crowns access a lap top to peruse ready access info. While I, have near a two foot
high stack of papers and we’re just getting started. With the use of a lap top, or the return of my stolen
computer equipment, along with transcriptions provided in digital format like the Crown has, I too,
could readily access the same info just as easily.

7.

Desmond Morris, History’s most widely published as recognized human behaviorist, who has a
number of world wide best sellers, states in his five part TLC TV series "The Meaning of Love", that
juvenile attributes to natural expressions between two adult lovers occurs frequently in private
settings. Something along the lines of naturally nurturing and protecting a healthy monogamous love
life. And of course, sexuality is a normal part of being human, as is curiosity. Well, generally,
curiosity is not a popular attribute to those who support Bush irrationally in their blind beliefs
suffering under his self inducing delusions, and as a result, as like self flagellating blind cult members,
often support warring innocent others or to torture my Humanity for being intelligently
communicative as the truly loving of God and family.

8.

I was provided most of the evidence on the regressive toll the Manitoba Lotteries take on our lives
here in Canada, by none other than the Honorable ---- ---- himself. He provided me the paper work
but informed me he couldn't publicly challenge the operation directly for good reason, but told me to
see what I could do on my own. I contacted the RCMP several times, but finding someone who could
understand the simple math skills wasn’t easy. But finally, I made some headway with one late night
officer I was speaking to, who after reviewing over the phone what I was saying, stated our RCMP
would likely refuse to investigate enforcing the criminal code, unless the ---- ------- made a
formal motion to act judiciously on the matter in Parliament. I already knew that wasn’t going to
happen. In frustrations I wrote "Stand Together or Don’t". Now, I’ve contacted Constable ----
---- at least five times on this huge national security issue, and, since she did allege top
secretly to a Judge I was anti-government by excluding any principled legal points I was making, I
figured her response would be telling. We’re still waiting. I will include the named artistic paper on
how the very serious costly crime with many real victims in Canada is secretly operated, to let our
Court consider my support for true accountability through effective police work.. Beckoning again to
call, just what does "Section D" do for us anywho?

[These next 11 points of fact are duplicate reiterations made previously, but done again for sake of
attempting completeness in support of the accompanying motion, "The Seeking of Friends Amicus
Curiae Application", in support of my request for legal assistance against the Crown’s subterfuge of
Justice.]

9.

Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta.
Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01,
Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the
wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering
reporter Daniel Pearl in February 2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC
News they've now tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to
accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also
reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN,
10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order must have preceded June 2000,
since that's when Atta and others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money ($109,910 is
received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June 19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]

10.

On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had received anonymously, top
secret presidential war strategy documents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from Condolezza's
office, outlining a strategy to invade Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but
providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only
workable if Laden pleads innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to
"justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving
Enron. ["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been
sufficient to have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had offered [as
others of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow up on the intelligence,
deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just society.

11.

RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin
Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of State, Colin Powell,
the United States has enough evidence to try bin Laden in an American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.

12.

[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States - 4 October 2001

http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden in a court
of law."

The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?

13.

Investigating the Investigation

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did the vice president call you
and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he
did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast meetings
repeated the request." ...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. Bush
four days later, but "on other dates following" as well.

14.

ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations

http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3

http://argentina.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/attilla.mp3

"Holy Christ.."

Get bush for 9/11 and all our problems will be solving.

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of Muslim
fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to persecute
the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had officially
done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene leads at the
real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret plot.

---

http://www.guerrillanews.com/headlines/6891/A_Gestapo_Administration

/ / /Bush has actually declared it treasonous to reveal his illegal behavior! His
propagandists, who masquerade as news organizations, have taken up the line:
To reveal wrong-doing by the Bush administration is to give aid and comfort
to the enemy. \ \

---

Canada: The time to speak on Khadr is now

http://www.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=11604

But the national radio and TV managers loyal to al-CIA-duh would
forbid such communications, like a publicly participated hearing of
his Canadian defense we would naturally want.

---

Pentagon propaganda program orders soldiers to promote Iraq war while home on leave

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=THO20051230&articleId=1682

/ / Clark wrote entries describing the company's commander as a "glory
seeker" and the battalion sergeant major an "inhuman monster". His last
entry before the blog was shut down told how his fellow soldiers were
becoming increasingly opposed to the US operation in Iraq. \ \

Dying American soldiers denied their rights to speak godly.

---

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7918.shtml

/ / [...] a Pentagon operation dubbed ``Operation Homefront,''
ordered military personnel to give interviews to their hometown
newspapers, television stations and other media outlets and praise the
American war effort in Iraq. \ \

This is not freedom for my America.

---

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4021

/ / Upon stealing the $10,000 that were in his coat pocket the troops that the
Americans are so proud of and support, found that he did not have any weapons
or explosives and then they dumped his body at the local hospital and walked
away with his money.

My cousin is a resident physician at the local hospital. \ \

I would have all enemy bushite arrested for trial.

---

/ / Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said NSA's inspector general should not be
conducting an investigation if the office has played a role in approving the
program. \ \

He would be the criminal actually. He's already admitted knowingly
to breaking the law for Bush. What more do we need to know about
America's weakness with an "unopposed" tyrant war mongering dictator
leading it's charges fraudulently?

---

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/National_Security_Agency_spied_on_Baltimore_0110.html

/ / "The NSA must be spying on us from the federal post office right across a
small street from the AFSC," Allwine said. "It's the only place that gives
them enough of a view to see our cars/license plate numbers." \ \

---

http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060110140308828

/ / This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is
buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice
Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in
prison. [...]

A law meant to annoy?
FAQ: The new 'annoy' law explained
A practical guide to the new [GEORGE BUSH] federal law that
aims to outlaw certain types of annoying Web sites and e-mail. \ \

This is serious bushite tyranny for America if you continue to
go silently wasting as forbidden to speak freely. George Norrie sucks!

-----

/ / "The dead included women and children whose bodies were recovered in the
nightclothes and blankets in which they had apparently been sleeping. A
Washington Post special correspondent watched as the corpses of three
women and three boys who appeared to be younger than 10 were removed
Tuesday from the house." \ \

How about we try the culprits responsible for ordering the strike, along
with bush bitch bomb dropper? Then after the case is
successfully prosecuted, we thank god for our perseverance, then,
continue on with the rest nazi bushite dumfuk enemies?

----

/ / It's like the Twilight Zone or some parallel universe.....a bad dream that
upon waking makes no real sense.... \ \

---

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m19457&l=i&size=1&hd=0

As Iraqis say; "If Al-Zarqawi is not dead, he is happily living on an American base".

---

‘‘In a free society, there's only one check on political speech
and that's the judgment of the American people,'' the president said to
applause from a friendly audience, a gathering of Veterans of Foreign Wars.
‘‘So I ask all Americans to hold their elected leaders to account
and demand a debate that brings credit to our democracy.”

The estimated cost to Iraq over the life of the new oil contracts is $74 to
$194 billion, compared with leaving oil development in public hands.

---

The Iraqi Resistance is not an "insurgency". Insurgency is an organized
rebellion aimed at overthrowing a legitimate and constituted government by
force, such as the Contras, a U.S. proxy terrorist gang used against the
legitimate government of Nicaragua in the late 1980s. There is nothing
legitimate about the U.S. Occupation and its puppet government in Iraq.

---

In that context, I would like to think that there may be millions of
movie-goers who learned from The Lord of the Rings saga the lesson that even
Hobbits --i.e. little people, who have no great eagerness for battle or for
heroics, who like nothing better than to live their own comfortable, decent,
bourgeois lives-- have it in them to rise up and confront and defeat the
awesome and repellant power of entrenched and organized evil.

---

It is noteworthy to remember that the Iraqi Children Care Organization (ICCO)
has reported during 2005 year only, no less than 71 (seventy one) cases of
rape undertaken by the debased and degraded US soldiers against Iraqi
children under ten.

---

The Panopticon: A Mass Surveillance Prison For Humanity

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/110106thepanopticon.htm

/ / A once free people are being totally enslaved and they have no idea as it
brazenly unfolds in front of their very eyes. \ \

---
I would think everybody would be on board for not killing. But our government
also exploits our fears; they try to demonize people and marginalize people,
so many people in my country don't believe that when we kill an Iraqi baby
that that's an innocent human being. It's like back in the Indian Wars when
Sherman said, "The only good Indian is a dead Indian." So I just can't
believe that my views are extreme because we are supposed to be a civilized
society.

President Clinton shelled Baghdad and killed an Iraqi painter called
Laila Alataar--who was the leading Iraq painter of the Middle East--and all
of her children.

----

http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3

/ / You have no rights. He'll tell you who is guilty without
any evidence to form your own conclusions, and if you disagree
with him, he'll call you the enemy, the terorists who aren't
with him on his blanket assertions against God as the innocent.
he blames for crimes while shutting down criminal investigations.
that would normally persue the actual evil doers. \ \

http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3

/ / And yet these are the guys that will fight for the demon
anti-Christ. Demanding certain people are unaccountable to
a rule a law. You know, South African death squad goons
that murder my black brothers. Bush says they can't be held
accountable to Iraqi law, and they can't be held accountable
to American law. But American tax payers are going to pay them
more than a thousand dollars a day, as a reward for being able
to think, that all super stars in America don't have the
humanity within themselves to speak in outrage on that fact
alone. \ \

---

"the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also make
clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating."

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/schwartz.php?articleid=8338

/ / This is terrorism by definition – attacking the
civilian population to get it to withdraw support from the
enemy. The change in strategy, therefore, represents the
embrace of terrorism as the principle tactic for subduing
the Iraqi resistance. \ \

DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/006455.php

/ / TALKING POINT: The illegal spying was required to
monitor "calls from very bad people to very bad people who
have a history of blowing up commuter trains, weddings and
churches"

FACT: False and false. If this were true, where is the
list of people who blew up commuter trains, weddings and
churches? Why are these monsters being hidden from public
view and why were they only "monitored" and not arrested
and deported from US soil? \ \

Naybe this is why..

/ / In addition to Gertz, other journalists who feature
prominently in the database include Seymour Hersh of The
New Yorker; author and journalist James Bamford, James
Risen of The New York Times, Vernon Loeb of The Washington
Post, John C. K. Daly of UPI, and this journalist [Wayne
Madsen]. \ \

DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR2005122201101.html

/ / Daschle wrote. "This last-minute change would have
given the president broad authority to exercise expansive
powers not just overseas -- where we all understood he
wanted authority to act -- but right here in the United
States[!], potentially against American citizens. I could
see no justification for Congress to accede to this
extraordinary request for additional authority.
[Congress] refused." \ \

DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD

/ / The National Security Agency, the top-secret spy shop
that has been secretly eavesdropping on Americans under a
plan authorized by President Bush four years ago,
destroyed the names of thousands of Americans and US
companies it collected on its own volition following 9/11 \ \

DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD

/ / The NSA ended up giving its raw data to then Under
Secretary of State for Arms Control John Bolton on at
least 10 different occasions since 9/11 \ \

DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD

/ / DNC Chairman Howard Dean pegged the total amount Bush
received from Abramoff at $100,000. Abramoff attended
three Hannukah receptions at the Bush White House -
Hannukah? What happened to fighting the War on Christmas?
- but Bush denies knowing him. "The president does not
know him and does not recall meeting him," said White
House spokesman Scott McClellan. \ \

DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD

/ / The President, according to Charley Savage of the
Boston Globe, issued a "signing statement" -- "an official
document in which a president lays out his interpretation
of a new law" -- in which he "quietly reserved the right
to bypass the [McCain] law under his powers as commander
in chief." \ \

DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD

http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/framing_bin_laden.htm

/ / The Taleban offered to turn Bin Laden over to a
neutral party if the US provided any evidence to them that
he had anything to do with the 1997 US African embassy
bombings or the 9-11 attacks.

The evidence was never presented to the Taleban for two
reasons:

1. There was never any evidence, not even circumstantial \ \

"The future of our country is at risk. We cannot continue
on the present course."

Impeach Bush and Cheney Now!
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES

http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0103-05.htm

/ / "The Bush Administration blocked an independent probe
into 9/11 while making fraudulent statements about the
reasons for invading Iraq, and now admits that it spies on
American citizens in disregard of legal limits. What more
does Congress need before it says enough is enough?" Ms.
Garrett added. \ \

/ / DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the
buying and selling of young women and children. While all
of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract
to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is
now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine
Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy
of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic
in women and little girls? \ \

/ / NSA lawyers advised the agency to immediately destroy
the names of thousands of American citizens and businesses
it collected shortly after 9/11 in its quest to target
terrorists in this country. \ \

/ / Saddam told the lawyers that he did not demand massive
revenge for a failed assassination attempt in 1982 in the
village of Dujail -- the basis of his current trial. He
said he just signed death warrants that judges had passed.
"I never asked about the Dujail case since I left that
place," he said. \ \

/ / Paradoxically the gravest concern the US troops in
Iraq face is not the Iraqi Resistance, but depleted
uranium, which has already killed 11000 troops
participating in the first Gulf War and disabled some
320,000, a number increasing by 43,000 a year, meaning
that soon all the US troops in the first Gulf War have
become casualties, and not only them: also their
girlfriends have been contaminated too, and their children
born with malignancies. \ \

/ / One caller, for example, said, "My father served in
Vietnam in 1961 and 1962. Is there a way he can find out
if he was exposed to Agent Orange?" The VA's response,
according to the VA memo: "He should know if they were
spreading that chemical out then. He would be the only
one to know. OK (hung up laughing)." \ \

/ / In addition to arbitrary arrests, inhuman treatment, violation
of residents’ rights and the theft of their belongings they shout
upon entering towns in the Province “The army of AlHusain is here
to break the noses of the Sunnis”. This is a simple indicator of
the sectarianism and hatred of such groups which was not familiar
to either Sunni or Shia Iraqis and is a further clear indicator of
the treachery of the parties that entered from beyond the borders
of the Iraqi people. \ \

/ / ABON — ABRAMOFF ARRANGED MEETING WITH BUSH FOR A FEE: Abramoff
“asked for $9 million in 2003 from the president of a West African
nation to arrange a meeting with President Bush and directed his
fees to a Maryland company now under federal scrutiny, according
to newly disclosed documents. \ \

/ / Bush told reporters after visiting wounded troops at Brooke
Army Medical Center. "I think most Americans understand the need
to find out what the enemy's thinking." \ \

/ / The International Committee of the Red Cross has noted at
least thirty locations in Basra that contain abandoned munitions
and unexploded ordnance (UXO). Most of these weapons were
abandoned by Iraqi forces, although some UXO were fired by
coalition forces. None of these sites has been secured by the
British forces occupying Basra. \ \

/ / Does anyone really believe there are thousands of legitimate
Al Qaeda targets to monitor in the U.S.? If so, just who is left
for the U.S. to allegedly be hunting in Afghanistan? The entire
Al Qaeda terrorist apparatus, and probably Hamas and the Red Army
Faction, must have moved stateside to come up with those kinds of
numbers! \ \

http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/57068

It did seem odd that the [bushite enemy] US forces
went into the neighborhood warning people about a
potential car bomb in the area, then used candy to
lure the children out into the open.

Using Zionist tactic, American troops bulldoze five houses in Hit.

The "Shock and Awe" Gallery©

http://www.marchforjustice.com/shock&awe.php

/ / "The children seem to be the most openly enthused.
They are getting a chance at a future the likes of which
would never have been possible under the oppressive
regime..." \ \

/ / Instead, DynCorp is "very disappointed in the tribunal's
ruling," and the company is considering an appeal. Is this denial
or yet another indication of where this company stands on human
slavery? If so it assuredly makes one wonder why the
Virginia-based Missing and Exploited Children organization
continues allowing its logo to be displayed on DynCorp's Website. \ \

/ /But the main question that has to be asked, and which is so
bewildering, is what it takes to get disqualified as a federal
contractor. Are lawmakers, who appropriate hundreds of millions
of taxpayer dollars to DynCorp, oblivious to the sexual outrages
tolerated by this federal contractor, and would taxpayers approve
of such enormous expenditures to a company that even appears to
excuse or protect such behavior? \ \

/ /There are many U.S. and international laws for
prosecuting torturers and all other civilian and military
criminals who commit cruel crimes. "While civilians may
not generally be tried in military courts for violating
U.S. laws, at least three [U.S.] federal laws provide a
means for prosecuting non-military personnel, including
[the Vice President for Torture, Bush-Cheney junta,] CIA
officials and civilian contractors, for criminal activity:
the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000;
the War Crimes Act of 1996; and the Torture Act of 2000,"
according to Human Rights First (HRF), formerly the
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. \ \

----

Censorship is the tool of tyrants, exercised through the
irrational bush whore thieves who fear open
communications, intelligence, because we make them look as
they truly are in the light of this day: profoundly
ignorant as the ungodly, and oh yeah, truly evil. [this
is why they volunteer as cowardly liars dying to commit
war crimes against defenseless children in Iraq and
Afghanistan as enemies to US all. All being Jesus, Allah,
Hillel, Buddha, or who have you.]

See the bushite, you kill it for America, you kill it for
Christ, you kill it for the hundreds of thousands of
innocent people that have been murdered in Your name.
Victims that the bushite boasts bombing indiscriminately,
to further steal and torture from openly. Do the right
thing by saving some innocent People their lives by
bagging a bushite for a loving Humanity that actually
really does exist. I love Humanity so much, I'd kill
bushite until every last anti-American torture supporter
was put in it's rightly grave.

By exercising your right to perceive representations of
that which is freely available, is of in itself, important
to the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of
course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our
shared reality. Perceptions of our dying world war
criminals fight by promoting censorship as our enemies to
escape found accountability.

HERO

http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3

http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3

/ / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,
"oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have
the two documents of question. \ \

----

"leveraging the lives of American soldiers in that
process to be sacrificed as fodder, So all the while,
(as again Senator Kennedy told US,) bush's business
partners, these war profiteers can literally siphon
billions of dollars from the undefended American tax
payers."

"Is that an American?"

http://www.nancyredstar.com/newslinks/iraqkids.htm

/ / The biggest story [forbidden by CNN and CBC] of the Iraq
war is about the torture of Iraqi children. \ \

http://rantburg.com/index.php?HC=1&D=7/21/2005#124578

/ / We confirm that the American occupation in Iraq and its
collaborators are the real killers of the Iraqi children and
civilians in al-Musayyib and in Baghdad in the last few days.'' \ \

/ / Mr. Tice intends to report to Congress probable unlawful and
unconstitutional acts conducted while he was an intelligence
officer with the National Security Agency (NSA) and with the
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). These acts involved the
Director of the National Security Agency, the Deputies Chief of
Staff for Air and Space Operations, and the U.S. Secretary of
Defense \ \

-----

I am contacting you in hopes you will consider the threat of my
false imprisonment here in Canada, an issue that You will assist
me in gaining a fair defense from.

I am welcoming Humanity to consider becoming involved in my case,
to provide myself advice on defensive measures unknown for my lack
of experience on such legalities. Feel free to contact us at your
earliest convenience to inquire further with any questions not
remedied by this e-mail, or other obligations I must meet to
insure our help on this serious criminal matter. Feel free to
forward or publish the affidavit and two motions present in this
public notice.

These following two Motions and Affidavit I am sending you have
been filed at the Court of Queen's Bench here in Winnipeg, and
also as Constitutional Challenges. I am hoping I can interest you
in realizing that this challenge is not only important to me as a
free citizen, but also for ourselves as the concerned world
community.

[the motions and affidavit have also gone to federal offices
(Constitutional challenges) and the Provincial]

Thanks for your consideration.

Synopsis: I had been writing critically of the Bush
Administration, when, the Secret Service top secretly
requested I be arrested quietly for threatening the life
of George W. Bush. They tentatively planned to have me
arrested under the Mental Health Act to avoid a public
criminal proceeding, but however during the process, I
managed to speak convincingly to the Honorable RCMP, and
the Secret Service, along with publicly speaking on local
Manitoba radio for no less than forty hours regarding Bush
in total, and was also well known throughout my community
involvement in live acting man theatrical productions I've
been a part of for more than a decade.

-----------------

http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/psychological-warfare_.mp3

http://sydney.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/t-timebig16.mp3

http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3

http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/canadian_radio_broadcast_interview_with_j._wizard.mp3

http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/guilty_of_innocence.mp3

/ / So, here I will offer you something I created, a Johnny
Wizard pencil drawing in jpg format. Enjoy! \ \

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/11/119755.php

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/07/268441.shtml

/ / Instead of murdering our own families as war criminals for bush
to pilfer the undefended wallets of our grandparents, why don't we
all smarten up, and just kill the unarrested demon bush instead as
something truly Patriotic? \ \

/ / "I absolutely confirm there were no terrorists in this house,"
police chief Colonel Sufyan Mustafa told Reuters. "Even if there
had been, why didn't they surround the area and detain the
terrorists instead?"

The Baiji strike was one of 58 air missions the U.S. military
carried out Monday over Iraq.

/ / "You can't have a corrupt lobbyist
unless you have a corrupt member (of Congress) or a corrupt staff.
This was a team effort," Gingrich told a Rotary Club lunch in
Washington on Wednesday. The implications are overwhelming. \ \

/ / Whether or not the targets were insurgents, the disregard for
the lives of civilians trapped inside the buildings demolished by
air attacks is part of a larger pattern articulated by an American
officer to NY Times reporter Dexter Filkins early in the war:
"the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also
make clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating." \ \

-----------------

AFFIDAVIT

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD

I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.

Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about $100,000 to
hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed
by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal, 10/10/01, AFP,
10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed
Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl in February
2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News they've now
tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to accounts
held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also
reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000.
[CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order must have
preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening bank accounts and
receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June
19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]

2.

On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had received
anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated September 9th, 2001,
originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade Afghanistan premised
on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up the allegations,
thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads innocence to a
crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American
GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron. ["The Dahbol
Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been sufficient to
have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had offered [as others
of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow up on the
intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our public
devolvement of a just society.

3.

RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban for proof that
Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary
of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try bin Laden in an
American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.

4.

[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
4 October 2001

http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden
in a court of law."

The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?

5.

Investigating the Investigation

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did the vice president
call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly
contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 the president
himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request."

...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. Bush four days
later, but "on other dates following" as well.

6.

ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html

Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop investigations into a
suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11
attacks...

`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'

7.

October 9 2001 - The Times of India

"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former ISI [the
"Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being
superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed here on
Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India produced to show his
links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.
authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC
hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the
instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have confirmed that
India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money transfer and the
role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they said that
Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the FBI in tracing
and establishing the link."

8.

No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So according to Bush's
official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no
part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink of starvation, Laden
agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied
to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs. Once the
indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the country of
Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to defend US
innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all fake
video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking remotely like Laden,
but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in
proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully shocking for some, the actor
doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on
CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the Internet.

9.

former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill

"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and
the role played by Saudi Arabia."

10.

Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow

"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop Al-Qaeda. They
threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he knows."

11.

Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete innocence
with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty."

12.

www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14

" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the Sept. 11 hijackers
were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also
included information relating to their financial activities. "

13.

The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can not be understated
as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to
save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.

From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz

" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy Task Force
meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be taken to remove the
Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the United States
controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999 and have known
since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit in US
District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration
settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the United States
Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas."

14.

From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
York), 25 May 2002:

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an
assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody
there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women and
children to kill them."

15.

Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of
Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"

by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire

When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village of Chowkar-
Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a
Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted them dead." The
reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the Chowkar incident,
Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village."

16.

US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS

http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm

"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians - some of whom
are entirely innocent.

And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the Pentagon's
spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma
when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger."

The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction, however, it is in mine as a
expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny
that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and false imprisonments.
An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s
children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that too?

17.

Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml

18.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm

"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no weapons, but that
with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran."

19.

http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872

CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating the Internet of two
Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who are
giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in English that reads, "Lcpl
Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!"

(Link to photo:

http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)

20.

Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated"
[this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]

This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC reporter no more that
thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news
report on it.

21.

INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.

INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.

"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It poisons the
grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it gets
into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity and heavy
metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic
alterations."

[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals, oxidized to
microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been deposited in our airspace,
however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically measurable
extremely serious health concern issue..]

22.

Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary power to use military
force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."
Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the torturing of
innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify
his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter."

23.

The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally
signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
(See original at

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)

24.

U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'

"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes and that forcing
Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal.

He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey, who is
expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis,
including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."

25.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html

that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees, ordering Defense
Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence
of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."

26.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml

A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly retaliating against him
for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the
White House's pre-war position.

27.

``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does, kill people, and I
had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act of
violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''

28.

Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light him up!" the
sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed
man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over which of them had
scored Company C's first kill.

29.

It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio, precinct that tallied
4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted.

30.

http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970

http://wallofhate.com

Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is
about to die

"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of about 10. She's behind the
embankment, scared to death."

"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be
killed."

31.

US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery rounds on Monday,
said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one
building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on the neighborhood
overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's northwest.

[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all TRUE accounts
of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,
exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]

32.

The Bush Administration
In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST

By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the
White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and
the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had requested a CIA
briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion
this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to the side" appeared to be
contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin
planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."

[ And...]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White
House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the
Taliban."

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of Muslim
fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to persecute
the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had officially
done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene leads at the
real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret plot.

33.

Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that Iraq had failed to
comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441.

HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform professional no-notice
inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..."

With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush Administration
pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to
bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being sacrificed for no better
good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to
bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the Bush Administration
starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped
19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent back.

34.

Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several weeks ago after
releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not
support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government story.
It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not struck by an
airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers.

Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with the heating
by high explosives.

Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"

The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies, and
also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion.

..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum temperature of 1517
degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel, when the melting
point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it becomes a molten
liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:

- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
- and the American Free Press newspaper

35.

"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have
suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."

Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee

36.

The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.

At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There he delivered the
bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader
Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its allies.

Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were reported as a
"failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a shred of eidence was
part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a military intervention
which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the main justification for
waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold. Nor would the ready
to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top
secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had been "fully
implemented"

38.

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country
who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the
leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and
denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." --
Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II

39.

On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a victim, thou shall
not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander"

SWORN before me
in the City of Winnipeg,
Province of Manitoba,

[this affidavit was sworn in federally and provincially as a massive
Canadian Constitutional challenge]

----------------

THE QUEEN'S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE

NOTICE OF MOTION

For an Order of Production

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

and

JOHNNY WIZARD

Accused.

This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed to
the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the Crown
holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following
arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall be
deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with
the principles of fundamental justice."

R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to
disclose all relevant information."

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as any
legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a
Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown's case.
Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return my
legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by
contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally
working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge
against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two:
that I don't already have the silent moral support of every honorable top
secret intelligence officer this world over.

Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in
Relation to Maher Arar"

"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are criminal
investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the
presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism."
[Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the
irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian
jurisprudence.]

Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown
holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her criminal
allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown
holds any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance the
false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where
specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes her
defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my computer,
deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written
texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal philosophy.
As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense against
fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being compromised,
can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge in
relative context to the personal life of the accused.

R. v. Sharpe

"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an
"educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the
material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the
possessor actually holds it."

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be backed
firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A
defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional
conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent blind
"overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of "overreaching"
are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of
individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being
managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where the
"offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it's all
going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth
of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America
recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off of
one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause before
then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for whatever,
to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly
legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the
weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for
the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her
possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a
popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly
impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty,
until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do
practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make
off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no
allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise,
not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the
criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we want in
our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling,
promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the
exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made
freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist,
concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our
shared reality.

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are personally
responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent
children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American tax
paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in
on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of cluster
dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our children
indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable
damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp's just
released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked national
child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating
factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our public's
right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I
articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings on who
orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along
with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General Mahmoud
Ahmad.

[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched the
Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be quested for
at www.globalresearch.ca]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html

http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm

The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass
murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all
children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the betterment of
the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public
truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General Hillier is
referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his nationally
broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of
Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under
the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?, and who
outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women? Women
who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear
burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would suggest her
ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those
children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to protect.
So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the hiding
in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of these
proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can be
sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, unto
it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled
character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury and
comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning of
each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the Crown
argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for
making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence the
Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood,
still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind support of
indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to
Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. While
myself, am a well documented public defender of children's rights and a
studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the
field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the
chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when not
terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's alleged
criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as
treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's expressions,
of some managed images, or some strewn texts.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting
just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes proudly
the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push
US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an
enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal self
contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community's
Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on
my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A honorable
defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate on
Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a
bushite's favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as
documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through the
mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know knowing any
better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any
factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts unchallenged
nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors
in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately
murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000
missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound bombs
containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved napalm
and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate age
range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by
the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in jeopardizing the
lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare public
cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised
world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe decision
allows this defense to be made on our behalf.

By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by my false
accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as
"collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my computer,]
while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so
I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's confusions, is
nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me
the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create an undue
hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.
Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of thousands
of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, and
a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know, I
have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly nature
when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening
vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew
their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W.
Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would leave
me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with good
coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the
evidence I demand the fair right to contend.

I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've made for
near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything. The Crown
has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not
granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she don't
want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the Crown's
crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise her
relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society.

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as
public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to consider
such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this
serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed by our
law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as
sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know mean a
great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the community,
to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is surely
what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against the
Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I need to
establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I can
establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's
Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a
criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by made
available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge]
Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court, because
usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff actually.
And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police
agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence for first
degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little Jewish
man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under
Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be
Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the
Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But this
innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me is
just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, the
Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by
following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and you.
So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to
our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against the
un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor criminal,
911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]]

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images to
sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown's
faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture.

I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms by
mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating systems,
and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here considering.
I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding
general media managements.

I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge sharing
web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by my
specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest
collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using such
services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very least, they
are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's standing
accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those responsible for
distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the
infraction against the public's interest can be compromised, but the
exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial interest
in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered
through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.]

I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for indicative
examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown's own
relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding my
for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings surmising the
faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals,
as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan despairingly
of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.

If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her
criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error of
her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to
try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move that
the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts help me
make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while
communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out
nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true money man -
Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so secret any
longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of
thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.

I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed programs to
access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides.

In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was at, by
indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our Court,
my TRUE intent as motive on this matter.

Yours truly,

JOHNNY WIZARD

------------------------------------

THE QUEEN'S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE

NOTICE OF MOTION

for the Crown to Stay Proceedings

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

and

JOHNNY WIZARD

Accused.

The Validity of the Law

While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually explicit
child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the impressionable, being
in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the public
body. It is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my
computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor, importantly,
can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already in your
possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you're already guilty on
nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too
late to point fingers elsewhere.

It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing through
the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed behind by an
arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead that some
completely unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the window,
leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record "Yeah, I saw
the, left to go on his own "stranger" do it. And it's a crime in this country
don't you know to be found in simple possession? Now, where are the keys to
the trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit crack head
loser?"

The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to prove a
criminal intent to do her things.

See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to
obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible
public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as
could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying world is a
setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing
content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your
home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least, already in your
possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the faulting
Crown, unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession charge,
but for by myself against the Crown's secret bushite crew for aiding and
abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City.

An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such materials are
expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as testaments
to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of sexually
exploited children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of seriously
cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five year prison sentence is
being made because the Crown has made included, condemnable interpretations of
the public's free expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own.
Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these prison term
perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew to be legal,
originated. If the Crown's case remains standing, why shouldn't we expect the
child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely
Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be shamed as
criminal through threatened public Court proceedings regarding your alledged
deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god honest,
testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could
leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your unseen
character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units distributing truly
illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who could be made
found only in simple possession of the accusers relative perception?

For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well over eighteen and
had her own legal website, don't matter for indictment, cause the expert of
expert experts they have in my case, a double full time professional computer
porno viewer, states with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic
wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or twelve. You're for
sure either normal being human, or guilty of thinking their bad thoughts
punishable with real prison sentences. As a result of course, I'm now
demanded to divorce my life of other critically important responsibilities, to
prove my complete innocence on these deliberately planned top secret schemes,
they didn't want You, the public to know of. A near criminal attempt, (as
documented by the now disclosed once top secret warrant), to silence my cries
for the arrest of the publicly established factual 911 masterminds - Our Mr.
bush Jr., General Ahmad, rumsfeld, myers and cheney, along with almost the
entire senior staff of disclosed as flagrantly criminal propaganda
proliferators, The Office of Special Plans.

The Warrant details by exclusion, a deliberate top secret plan on the Crown's
part, a deviant anti-government plan to silence my calls for accountability
through my world wide public addresses on the FBI answers still surrounding
the murder of thousands of American Citizens. The Crown, as an attempt to
undermine Liberty by thwarting me off my one chosen career path of Universal
Speaker, and fictionalized demon slayer - leaves you instead, this quickly
passing opportunity to stand up for the rights of another being cheated for
real, and in so doing, we'll find together, that true freedom is justice for
US all. Law stands strong for good reason, so too, does tyranny rule by
censorship for false imprisonment. Do not allow my voice for freedom's reign
to be silenced unjustly, by those who would have us falsely believe, Bush
personally didn't do the crimes we all easily now know the evidence of.

An unjust Law enslaves all Religions, for reason is beautifully Just through
your will to conceive, that God's interests are as naturally too, your own
included. My commitments to equal rights for all have never changed, and
Humanity's true commitment to defend Iraqi children to the last cowardly
murderous thieving bushite enemy, will carry on, despite the corrupted Crown's
attempt to stop real Justice from continuing. When one views public
photographs of rumsfeld's un-arrested mercenary soldiers raping an Iraqi
woman, are our rights being further violated with every passing witness? How
about witnessing that Guantanamo's torture victim Moazzam Begg, was running a
girl's school program with his wife under the female loving Taliban? [You
know, Moazzam Begg, the one and same British Citizen depicted solely by heroin
pushing donald "sexy cluster dud land mine dropper" rumsfeld, as one of our
Lord's most dangerous criminals?]

The Crown alleges in truly contemptuous silence, she's not interested in
defending the rights of those children, or victims of mass murder, while
voicing publicly in Our Court, that I, am infringing on the rights of children
somewhere else because, even though no body is perceiving the data located
anywhere on my hard drive, it still magically constitutes a personal
violation, on its own by itself, of an unjust law that others have been
demonized, robbed, then falsely imprisoned on. This irrational demand on
behalf of the Crown to Your Court, where she states her private viewings do
not infringe on children's rights, while EVERYONE else's does somehow, even if
you didn't see at all the picture judged as the reflecting mind of a true
sexual deviant, is US ALL being the auto-guilty anyway, and not firstly
innocent as it should be. See, the Judge could say to a Jury, "Your job is
not to judge the injustice committed with these blind and broken laws, but
that solely, did Top Cop Johnny have this one single picture on his computer?,
and if he did, then the bushite liars who fight our systems of accountability
through Justice to further escape real rapists, torturers, and documented
treasonous war criminals like those who for sure committed 911, get to put him
in Our prison for half a decade."

However this issue requires much for further study. It turns out my two
primary accusing officers who deal with real sicko child porn every day full
time, also support death squads against innocent families in Afghanistan to
protect the demon lies of George W. Bush, and they'd almost tell the jury
that too as blind devote disciples of the self hating bushmob cabal of neo-con
peenackers, if the Crown wasn't there to forbid the truth from being spoken.

The two abusers, the two anti-cop officers of question, lied to me, then
censored my agreement they had their word on, then, attempted to twist my
comments into something clearly I didn't mean.. and that's not even the half
of it. So, don't tell me I'm being over critical of their naked wicked evil.
If an image was an offensive act witnessed, why then is it that a genuine
concern is not with a possible victim all the time? The shocker to the
uninitiated in the battles of good against evil in these child exploitation
units, is that rarely do they have a real monetary care to follow though with
the details. - "Oh, the girl is really a woman, and the web address on the
digital image is of a server acting completely within the confines of our law,
nudist campers are nudist campers, and as for the beautifully naked young girl
taking a bubble bath smiling, er.. I mean the one looking seductive...
drat." Examples: I have many texts willfully ignored by the Crown that
articulate irrational praise for one heinous crime against God or another of
the un-elected neocon war wankers, that I, as a human, certainly don't find
myself in automatic, no free thought agreement with., right? And my objective
as Human defender isn't to censor the known criminality of the, murder
innocent people for the war profiting bushmob liars, but to expose the true
injustice committed against our better selves - US all dying slavishly
censored through Our corporate international communication network of good old
ideas left long gone dead and buried. Hammurabi's Code of Law: it's first
sentence, of his first paragraph, the number one most important Law as
example. - Here's the translation - The public figure blaming someone else
for a capital offense, such as terrorist, who uses NO EVIDENCE for PROOF, to
murder in Your name as Citizen, is the FOR SURE ENEMY, always, EVERY TIME.
And in the next four thousand years that single law has timelessly stood
unbroken, not one person has been capable to declare a true, wanting
disagreement.

The corporate news mandate is to take You for granted - without any given say
so. Our sold as sworn public defenders, CBC, CNN, et al, hold no opinions of
our Humanity on the needless indiscriminate bombing of populated cities, the
torturing of men women and children by un-arrested as openly confessed
complete psychotics, the thieving of hundreds of billions from America and
Iraq, and as such, tyrannically support [don't call us, will call you] commi
censorship, all done in to assist the "escape" of those truly responsible for
the crimes of 911.

When the Crown argues that disturbing images simply in your possession
constitute an absolute evaluation of your punishable character, while
denying\forbidding a Court to know what you do in your life with our time is
faulted. I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've
made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything.
The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are. This
insistence on behalf of the Crown on what we all perceive individually by
judgment is determined solely by media content - is a foolish falsehood
forwarded by Our Great Lord's, Supreme Court of Canada. Example: Does not
the public videos of rumsfeld's, defended from YOUR LAW bushite soldiers,
gunning down women and children running for their lives from a mosque, or
where hundreds of unarmed defenseless families are huddled together, then
bombed by a bushite enemy grunt, a grunt who on VIDEO TAPE, moans itself to
orgasm when they all die as the innocent murdered with "ah.. dude" just speak
for itself? Sure, the celebrating bushies repeatedly depicted have no honor,
or courage, only a fascistic hatred for their fellow man - openly thieves who
die without a fighting cause for Freedom, nor a true commitment to Law - but I
would ask if We had a voice to cry in Your Court, what do You see in this
corporate World that leaves my stand professionally unworthy for
deliberations? The Crown's concern remains silent on the DOCUMENTED and
easily verifiable murder issues, when she has her regular huddles with a local
corporate reporter, discussing on who, from the community, was in Our court
challenging, a sexually dysfunctional sadomasochistic label. For the Crown to
witness and know first hand of such barbaric criminality, such as the true
perpetrators of 9/11 found revealed by THE FBI stinger, along with the rest of
the evidence trail that all leads directly to the Whitehouse, is a Crown who
does not hold Canadian's freedom in check, or a care for our soldier aged sons
and daughters conflicting near death. But to side instead, as they are hiding
behind the honorable Crown's position, a small group of four or five dim
blips, attempting they are to silence these calls for real freedom for the
masses. I am a proud and honorable man who objects to furthering bush's war
crime aims with this lifeless corporate tyranny of enslavement through whoring
for the dark foreboding wills of Our Mr. bush Jr.. Censorship is the tool of
tyrants, while I beckon a new light for peace by communicating. Please, I beg
you, do not allow them to silence my objections to have us unjustly
imprisoning myself, while bringing great hardship to my immediate family by
denying the truth be spoken publicly in my defense on why I'm in the Court
room, and what is documented irrespective of their spin doctoring and label
pasting.

Where is the violation of a child's rights, specifically, when the Crown's
crew gleefully ponder images she'll use to silence the words of Johnny Wizard
by prison sentence? Where? No, where?

Commanding our public indignation for those who disrespect human rights she
will use as her weapon, all the while, hidden from the jury, and the judge, a
secret contempt for thousands of innocent murder victims denied my
unchallenged demands for real Justice. No officer of our laws anywhere have
found fault with my PUBLIC summation, documented fully, on who, and how, 9/11
was truly orchestrated. A Crown stuck committed to global bushite tyranny Vs.
a Truth seeker of the highest order. Come to the trial! Tell your friends!
Tell your neighbors! The People vs. an overburdened unjust Crown, and a near
treasonous national security officer, who wrote in the original top secret
warrant nobody was suppose to see, it'd be so much easier to help bush escape
arrest by avoiding the public accountability process entirely. The once top
secret Johnny Wizard Warrant is freely available with most names being
detracted, to protect the innocent until proven guilty. A traitor to God and
Country the Crown and one National Security officer potentially is in this top
secret bush administration conspiracy endeavor, to serve by bushite criminal
decree up here in defenseless Canada. For as potential accessories to first
degree mass murder, they are stuck attempting to undermine Canada's National
Security Services, the FBI, the People, US, all to further unjustly sacrifice,
more of our uninformed sons and daughters for further bounty, as substantiated
real world criminal, bushite evils. I say no. Help me get public recognition
through talk radio, take a stand for your fellow man, and help a Jury in
Winnipeg learn of who I am, and why they are forbidden to know what's truly
going on, and you'll be helping yourself to a better future. My principle
allegations against George W. Bush require a qualified and adapt security
officer no more that forty three minutes to verify. Namely, bush's business
partner, General Ahmad funded 911's "mastermind" "ringleader" Atta, and was
also sent, the General was, from the Whitehouse on behalf of bush to the
Taliban stating, no evidence will be brought against Laden as the accused,
therefore an innocent man in Christ. And, that as MSNBC reported of the top
secret documents provided to themselves anonymously from Condoleezza Rice's
office, George had a confidential plan at his desk on how to invade
Afghanistan dated September 9th, 2001 that he didn't want anybody in America
to know he was working on during his "vacation". His confessed publicly to
MSNBC, as "fully implemented" Afghanistan strategy, demanded that he not
pursue the true 911 evil doers, for it would upset his made before hand,
guaranteed plan. That had soldier grunts moving out to get ready just before
the event. All premised on blaming Laden as a terrorist without a shred of
evidence, for a crime that hadn't yet taken place, but that bush was
personally prepared as closing investigations on. To secure criminal invasion
he would refuse to follow the evidence trail - and as a result - NOT apprehend
the have to let go - falsely accused bin Laden. [cowardly soldiers who didn't
speak up as real Patriots would have much earlier, who were ordered to let
Laden go on his way in Torra Borra, have now all mostly fallen quietly dead.,
by fluke mishap or something like the sort it is said.] All set in play, this
plan of Our Mr. bush Jr's, top secretly with General Ahmad riding gun shot,
just days before thousands of American People were still left unaccountably
murdered. See? Mr. Bush would need such an event to happen unhindered as a
requirement to galvanize world sentiment. Providing no evidence substantiated
would guarantee his needed invasion for American pension thievers Enron, and
that is exactly what HE planned, what HE did, and who HE is. Evil is the
deceived disguised. What more do you need to know buddy?

I, armed with only the facts, demand the arrest of those who participated in
the murder of children to protect the demon lies of George W. Bush, while the
Crown's case, on top of alleging that the simple possession Law [no criminal
intent to express or obtain is alleged] states a child's rights are being
infringed on due to the content by itself, ALONE, appears ready to fight for
disallowing a jury, to freely witness, this fishing expedition was
intentionally started to stop me speaking my outrage that bush hasn't been yet
arrested for committing 9/11 with General Ahmad, so according to the
unmentionables in the no longer top secret Warrant. That this Crown would
officially state holding our virtues while attempting to condemn me to a long
prison sentence, shows her possible personal true contempt for the value of
Your human life my friend. I have written extensively on defending the rights
of children, and the psychology of sexually dysfunctional sadomasochists, I
have studied this world to create some thing greater than average, some thing
better than nomal, a world where all children are respected, including those
of Iraq who have been purposefully denied safe drinking water, because
negroponte needed to STEAL the emergency funds for his new embassy. See?, she
would argue that those real world crimes aren't relevant to my case in her
hands, those REAL children like perhaps your own don't concern her, nor do the
lives of Canadians lied to by corporate command for criminal sacrifice. The
Crown convinces us irrationally, with her only excuse being, because the
specific broken Law she's decided to singly exercise, (with the exclusion of
all others, like thou shall not murder,) stupidly says she can, and you
dummies can't do anything at all about it yourself. Why? Because you wont
speak out for anyone else's rights to be heard publicly - the bushite enemy
trust to figure. Justice is Freedom, and to have a real concern for another's
lost rights to freely be, is to be truly concerned with your very own in
serious jeopardy. I wouldn't lie to you. Believing, as the bushite do,
willfully deceitful corporate news propaganda excuses the Bush
Administration's rampant criminality against the innocent as God is, truly,
excuses nothing, especially if I have something to say on the subject of
accountability.

This final Court challenge against my Freedom to be myself, that the bush
administration attempted firstly to do top secretly, has now been laid
publicly at our door step as a blatant threat to everyone of us as a member of
the Canadian Public. Will you help me politely address my false accusers on
our public airwaves? Will you help speak for freedom from tyranny is this
question riddled, or will you deny yourself my generous helping?

The reasons why such abhorrent behaviors continue unaddressed in our Police
Force actions will be documented fully with remedies offered during the second
part of the third phase of the upcoming Question Period press conferences -
press conferences running during the available down times of The Trial of

JOHNNY WIZARD

------------------------------------------------

A for real guitar god

http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/big-package.mp3

COMMENTARY FROM JOHNNY

http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/yeah-yah.mp3

Johnny Wizard's "Time.mp3"

http://michiganimc.org/usermedia/audio/11/TIME.mp3

/ /And that of course gives the bushites and CBC and CNN their
implausible deniability, where they can say their remaining
neutral, by not providing us the facts to allow us to decide for
ourselves. Because otherwise, we wouldn't kill ourselves to profit
the bushmob cabal of God haters. Who victimize innocent Christians
for no other reason but for to profit off our suffering.

[...]

Think of all those people in that situation as God. And these, the
bushite nazi grunts, have positions that are completely irrational,
they're making no sense, your fuking up. It's like a cancer that
God of that whole situation, is inflicted with. They're lying to
themselves. If your there to fight on behalf of Iraqis, you take a
position to demand all the money that has been taken through this
Iraq Development Fund, be returned. \ \

--

/ / What is particularly disturbing is how the
administration misused intelligence information to make
its case for war and failed to plan competently for the
postwar period. \ \

What seems even more disturbing, to me, and PBS'
FRONTLINE, is that there was a "State" plan, the ORHA
plan to prevent looting and carnage, but it was
sabotaged by rumsfeld and franks, so the bushmob could
try to make some sense of needlessly bombing the country
for our labored dollars, while robbing the central bank
and museum by mopping up the mess with the bodies of
American Patriots still dying as dumfuks.

-----------------

Former NSA Intelligence Analyst & Action Officer Urges to be Heard by
Congress Regarding Unlawful Conduct by NSA

---------

Sleep Walkers

http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/sleep_walker_-__our_enemy_traitor_mr._bush_jr.mp3

http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/sleep_walker_-__our_enemy_traitor_mr._bush_jr.mp3

HERO

http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3

http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3

/ / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,
"oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have
the two documents of question. \ \

What is the Coast to Coast radio network Head talking
about tonight?, the re-re-re-hashing of the "Allaways
Interslinging" Bigfoot phenomenon? Where was I...

Look, you're not going to go to hell for not giving me a
couple of dollars to further my cause, but it sure
couldn't help to leave me without any support here
whatsoever.

--

White House keeps dossiers on more than 10,000 'political enemies'

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7625.shtml

---

hi everyone..

Well, it would seem, I was foolishly mistaken. It doesn't cost me
anything to submit my Motions, for, in criminal matters, they waive
the charges. As for Family Law, Bankruptcy Court, and the like,
they're still out of luck. While, the Constitutional Challenge
remains still gridlocked, it may only end costing me a total of a
few bucks in bus fare.

---

Hail Hail line of Judah

Again, to destroy treasonous enemy bushite nazi vermin, is
to fight to truly defend, Humanity as the freedom loving,
innocent and godly. A bushite slave would steal it's own
grandparent's pension, and give it to the thieving neocon,
thoughtlessly all to please the god hating demon
antichrist they fall down dead in cowardly praise to.
While I, Johnny Wizard, am just looking for a few good
honorable men, real American Patriots, who are truly
committed, to helping us fight the most wicked evil of
evils to ever threaten mankind's existence. Listen UP all
you People - here comes a King Johnny Wizard STANDING LAW:
Torture is a criminal act warranting a life term sentence
to those who commit such an irrational offence, and an
automatic death sentence to those who caused the murder of
what is more like always, a completely innocent person
denied their equal rights with such barbaric action. And
if sorrowfully, Johnny's America contains no good
honorable men to enforce this Standing Law, leaving still
our great Humanity as Creation in contempt of this Court,
I, the Lord, will hunt the bushite down and destroy them
myself.

In the game of Life I am born sworn to defend all that is
godly as the innocent. By attempting to communicate
eternally indivisible wisdoms, I hope that soon, Americans
will finally know, torture is already illegal in 50
States, and if that doesn't work in this toxic waste land
bereft of intelligent open communications, a land where
tyrants who advocate mass murder campaigns are corporately
celebrated as repeatedly broadcast internationally, we'll
all then, have to get much more serious about this enemy
to all of Life itself american/bushite business. I will
try my level best to settle the American frontier in
respect for America's truly Great Fathers. A nation that
has now forgotten it learned already when championing the
rights of the individual - were what America is as founded
upon. Now, in bush-ville, who gives a fuck about goodie
goodie gum shoe Johnny going to our society's prison, or
anybody else besides denied their rights to be truly free,
right?

All I ask you do is get on the talking radio waves and ask
why don't we invite Johnny Wizard on for a lively debate
with the facts for a change? Is that too much for me to
ask of You stranger? Won't you please help us face our
false accusers?

Above all kingdom's of evil,

Johnny Jesus rules forever

---

The United States of America v. Adam Vaughn

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.10/kidporn.html

He was a stand-up Marine, a beloved cop, and a local hero

/ / Vaughn was accused of possessing child pornography on
the basis of images in his browser cache and downloaded
photos he had deleted from his hard drive long before the
accusations.

J. Wizard

Trouncing the Demon Bush Cabal

Publish

Publish your news

World Topics

Kollektives

Encrypted Page

IMCs