Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Peace workers denied access Bethlehem

ISM London (ish) | 21.12.2005 12:13 | Repression | Social Struggles | World

Latest news 9pm: lawyer says Israeli authorities will try to
deport the 3 early tomorrow morning before she has a chance to file a court request to freeze the deportation and pursue the
matter in court. Their phones seem to have been taken away and they are incommunicado.

Press release: 20th December 2005

Peace workers denied access to Bethlehem

In the early hours of this morning the Israeli authorities at
Tel Aviv airport stopped a group of international observers who
were en route to a Christmas peace conference in Bethlehem.

After lengthy interrogations, two (UK) were allowed to enter the
country and three were denied entry on ‘security grounds’. The
three (S Africa, Italy, Australia) intend to challenge this
decision in the Israeli courts. Now they expect to spend
Christmas in jail, rather than in Bethlehem.

The group are experienced peace campaigners who were on their
way to the “Celebrating Non-Violence” conference to be held in
the Palestinian town early next week. All five have worked
previously as international observers in the Palestinian
territories.

Spokesperson Charlotte Carson states: “Our colleagues are being
stopped from attending a conference about non-violent activism
because they are non-violent activists. Clearly, Israel is
afraid of the power of non-violence.”

The detained are all members of Access for Peace in the Middle
East, a pressure group that intends to challenge the
criminalisation of peace workers and the deliberate isolation of
Palestinians from international observation and assistance.

Robin Horsell, a UK-based South African who formerly campaigned
against apartheid gave his reasons for making this legal
challenge:

“Israel gives spurious grounds for deportation or refusal of
entry. But the real reason is our support for human rights and
justice. We hope this legal challenge sets a precedent that in
future will allow international citizens full access to
Palestinian lands.”

This campaign is supported by many prominent peace campaigners,
including Jews for Justice for Palestinians, Nonviolence
International, George Monbiot, AngieZelter, Jeremy Hardy and
European Jews for a Just Peace.

Notes:

Since 2000, the Israeli authorities have denied entry to the
Occupied Palestinian Territories to hundreds of international
citizens who intend to work with grassroots organisations such
as the International Solidarity Movement, Christian Peacemaker
Teams, the International Women’s Peace Service, and many other
NGOs that provide humanitarian assistance to the occupied
civilian population.

Israel calls itself ‘the only democracy in the Middle East’, yet
its practice of obstructing the passage of hundreds of observers
and peace activists calls its democratic credentials into
question.

According to the Palestinian Red Crescent organisation (the
equivalent of the Red Cross), during the last five years 3754
Palestinian men, women and children have died from Israeli
military action. The vast majority of these casualties have been
civilians.

For more information, contact: Charlotte: +44 (0) 7768 305897
charlotte {a t} ism-london.org
or Roger +44 (0) 7785 792107 info {a t} ism-london.org

ISM London (ish)
- Homepage: http://www.ism-london.org.uk/

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Misreported?

21.12.2005 15:33

And here I thought I was going to read about the peace activists having already gotten into the occupied West Bank territiries and then being internally blocked from getting to Bethlehem. Or at least that they had been blocked trying to cross over the Israeli patrolled border from Jordan directly into the occupied West Bank and blocked from doing that.

But instead what I read is that they were blocked from entering Israel proper. And reporting that as if they had a RIGHT to enter Israel for whatever purpose.

OK -- they are entitled to a belief that we should have a right to enter whatever country we desire, a belief in "no borders". But in that case, why make a fuss about ISRAEL in that regard? No need to leave home to protest countries insisting on an absolute right to deny entry to whomever is classified "non grata" for whatever reason. One is rather hard pressed to think of any countries that do not insist on that right.

Might I humbly suggest that it would be easier to make the objection clearer to the Israelis by submitting a list of countries which allow "free entry" and demanding that Israel follow the same policy.

Mike
mail e-mail: stepbystpefarm mtdata.com


Securiry - this could be the answer

21.12.2005 16:38

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4545078.stm

"Gunmen seize Bethlehem City Hall"

sceptic


erm, Mike

21.12.2005 17:54

Feels like we're getting into academic semantic bollocks discussions - it is not possible to enter Palestinian territory without going through Israeli border controls, whether from Jordan or at Tel Aviv airport, or Haifa port, or wherever. The best chance to get to a Bethlehem non-violence conference, if you think you might get trouble on entry, is via the airport, because at least you can try and fight it legally, rather than just getting thrown back into Jordan with no chance of getting to Palestine.

People get internally blocked every hour every day by the Israeli army, inside the West Bank, so it wouldn't be any great shakes to report, though it means people dying, miscarrying, losing jobs, studies etc.

Yes some other countries try to stop people entering for various reasons, but they are not trying to stop them entering another country, as is the case here, they give reasons, and it's subject to legal challenge. The only way in this case to challenge it legally is to physically resist being put back on a plane. People stopped by Israel at various borders are not given the reason why they are stopped, nor are they given the chance to appeal it. In this case, all 5 said they were going to do the same things in the same places, but there was selective treatment.

Thank you for your humble suggestion, but Israel, like most states, does not change policy by demanding they follow suit, or whatever.

Michael


Red Herring

22.12.2005 03:35

It's not where they were stopped, but why. Israel doesn't want the peacemakers in Israel, and they especially don't want them in the Territories, those embattled portions of the Palestinian State which still remain.

The Zionists want the two sides as divided as they can be.

Don't Let Them Limit The Debate


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech