The price of allowing David Blunkett to stay on in the Tiny Blair cabinet despite latest details about Bplunkett's improper behaviour may be to let Blair mount the one attack that he has been unable to do so far: to really violate the people in poverty in a frontal onslaught on all sort of rights that so many people fouight so hard to establish over the past 100 years
Is Tony Blair priming Blunkett for another assault on the people in poverty in the UK?
© AADHIKAR DAILY WORLD COMMENTARY
2350 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 1 November 2005
Tony Blair must have extracted the highest price from david Blunkett in exchange for allowing the disgraced Blunkett to stay on ion the Blared cabinet.
That price is not going to be paid by Blunkett himself. He is by all accounts of all the reports of his ability to make financial gains beneficiary of the scandalous deals he has been engaging in.
The price is going to be paid by the people; in poverty in Britain.
The fact that there are people in Britain who are neither asylum seekers nor illegal immigrants nor criminals by any stretch of the definition of criminality, is the most damning indictment on Tony Blair.
That Blair has lied through his over-flashed teeth through his entire career as the occupant of Number 10 Downing Street is proof positive of his own unsuitability for office of Prime Minister
That he has stayed in that office despite his embarrassing record is not in any way evidence of any moral or ethical or legal claim on his part to stay in that office.
That he has been allowed to stay on in office shows that there is no constitutional democracy in Britain. That there is no moral authority behind the state that is fronted by Tony Blair.
that is why there is no feeling of compulsion on Tony Blair’s part that Blunkett has to be sacked for the final time.
Instead Blair has set in motion the second spin movement to salvage Blunkett in order to mount probably the most phenomenal attack on the people kept in poverty in Britain.
And Blair knows that not one single Blaired MP in the House of Commons will challenge Blair in any significant way whatever that will make any difference in so far as defending the people cast into poverty goes.
With the Maxwellian (as in Robert Maxwell) swindle of the state pensions
provisions, Tony Blair has effectively smashed what sued to be cal;led the welfare state and the people who have been involuntarily poor in the past 30 years are going to joined by those who have been hoodwinked or fooled by the Blair adventures and opportunism and by Blair’s careeristic antics into thinking that at least they are ‘safe with Blair. They are not.
the people who have been cast into Britain during the past 30 years are in for a shock.
Blair is engaged on a war ion the people whop have been pushed into poverty. Blair is going to be as ruthless in violating the people pushed into poverty as he has been in attacking the millions of innocent people in Asia.
Time is ripe for a mass movement of the people pushed into poverty in Britain by Tony Blair to mobilise and to march in even bigger numbers than we have been marching against Blair war on Iraq...
The people in Britain literally cannot afford to be attacked by Blair any more than he has been allowed to do upto to now
© AADHIKAR DAILY WORLD COMMENTARY
2350 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 1 November 2005
Tony Blair must have extracted the highest price from david Blunkett in exchange for allowing the disgraced Blunkett to stay on ion the Blared cabinet.
That price is not going to be paid by Blunkett himself. He is by all accounts of all the reports of his ability to make financial gains beneficiary of the scandalous deals he has been engaging in.
The price is going to be paid by the people; in poverty in Britain.
The fact that there are people in Britain who are neither asylum seekers nor illegal immigrants nor criminals by any stretch of the definition of criminality, is the most damning indictment on Tony Blair.
That Blair has lied through his over-flashed teeth through his entire career as the occupant of Number 10 Downing Street is proof positive of his own unsuitability for office of Prime Minister
That he has stayed in that office despite his embarrassing record is not in any way evidence of any moral or ethical or legal claim on his part to stay in that office.
That he has been allowed to stay on in office shows that there is no constitutional democracy in Britain. That there is no moral authority behind the state that is fronted by Tony Blair.
that is why there is no feeling of compulsion on Tony Blair’s part that Blunkett has to be sacked for the final time.
Instead Blair has set in motion the second spin movement to salvage Blunkett in order to mount probably the most phenomenal attack on the people kept in poverty in Britain.
And Blair knows that not one single Blaired MP in the House of Commons will challenge Blair in any significant way whatever that will make any difference in so far as defending the people cast into poverty goes.
With the Maxwellian (as in Robert Maxwell) swindle of the state pensions
provisions, Tony Blair has effectively smashed what sued to be cal;led the welfare state and the people who have been involuntarily poor in the past 30 years are going to joined by those who have been hoodwinked or fooled by the Blair adventures and opportunism and by Blair’s careeristic antics into thinking that at least they are ‘safe with Blair. They are not.
the people who have been cast into Britain during the past 30 years are in for a shock.
Blair is engaged on a war ion the people whop have been pushed into poverty. Blair is going to be as ruthless in violating the people pushed into poverty as he has been in attacking the millions of innocent people in Asia.
Time is ripe for a mass movement of the people pushed into poverty in Britain by Tony Blair to mobilise and to march in even bigger numbers than we have been marching against Blair war on Iraq...
The people in Britain literally cannot afford to be attacked by Blair any more than he has been allowed to do upto to now
Comments
Display the following 6 comments