Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Anti-Lydd Airport demo-report

pirate | 27.08.2005 12:41 | Globalisation | Social Struggles | Technology | South Coast | World

A protest against Lydd Airports expansion plans was held Aug 27th.


Around 40 or so people protested outside the entrance to Lydd Airport on Romney Marsh today. The demo had been called by a new coalition in the area - Keep The Marsh Special Alliance- to help raise awareness of the grave dangers to the local environment and the wider threat to climate change from continued airport expansion projects such as Lydd.

Vehicles passing were around 2.5 to 1 in support of the anti airport demo.

(A mere 'clack' of 10 or so assembled opposite to feebly support the airport.)

People from the local area along with members of the Shepway FoE, Kent and Shepway Greens and Shepway Lib Dems joined coalition partners Lydd Airport-No Expansion in a noisy and colourful demo with a variety of banners.

Anyone looking in on the BBC South East region (esp Kent). There should be a report on the local prog at around 5.30pm (after the footie results/Main news) tonight.
----------------------------------------------------------

In brief response to posts under the demo alert posted on the 25th Aug

There is a great deal of already established evidence of the damage to the climate from air travel. It is ranked second only to car emissions as a producer of excess CO2.

The arguments that this airport would help relieve congestion elsewhere are absurd given that EU Jet collapsed at Manston and people are increasingly taking the Eurostar to Europe ( takes nearly two thirds of people to the EU etc and is set to increase as/when the new CTRL link is finished) That's how people can travel instead of by polluting air.

Despite so called Gov statements about any 'need', it really is a non starter for any further air expansion. The very latest evidence on global warming has climate scientists revising their figures on temp levels and sea level rises both upwards and sooner. It is increasingly urgent that strong action against those factors that contribute to it are curtailled NOW.
Romney Marsh is very likely to start flooding far sooner than most think.

Further the ever rising price of oil and the eventual need to tax aviation fuel and other parts of the industry make the economics unviable- espcially for anyone trying to invest and or expand. The person who bought Lydd Airport is very likely to find it becomes a millstone if he keeps trying to get it expanded and maybe even kept at or near present levels.

Kent County Council has already thrown out the idea of an increase to 2 mill passengers a year as again unlikely and unviable.

Alternative employment on Romney could easilly come from improving tourism to the area (which would be driven away by noise from aircraft), Possibly making microgeneration units at a factory on the old Dungeness N power stn. biocrops , cottage hospitals and many other ideas that have and are being advanced.
----------------------------------------------------

www.lyddairport-noexpansion.co.uk

see also (for general info)
www.foe.org.uk

and

www.airportpledge.org.uk
(the campaign alliance against UK airport/transport expansion- FoE/Greenpeace/People&Planet/Transport2000/RisingTide).

-----------------------------------------------------

pirate

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

So the yes camp are complacent and the no camp don't exist

27.08.2005 15:33

So it was a pretty poor turnout on both sides then. The no camp can't gather even a fraction of the people living under the flight path, the yes camp don't bother to demonstrate because they know they will get their way. Not quite Manchester second runway or Heathrow T5. Of the 40 whi turned out, how many are genuine local prople and how many are FoE, Greens, Lib Dems etc who oppose every construction project for the sake of it.

There is no scientific consensus on the causes of climate change. For every reputable scientist who believes in the CO2 theory there is an equally reputable one who dosn't. In any event, modern aircraft used correctly can be more fuel efficient than motor vehicles. The quantity of fuel used by aviation is dwarfed by that used by the motor vehicle. If you're concerned about the oil supply or CO2 you would be better campaigning against Americans doing their shopping in huge 4x4s. The price of oil is a function of politics and unnecessary wars, not supply. There are many reserves of oil we have not even considered tapping yet.

You may be unaware whilst AVTUR (jet fuel) is exempt from duty, AVGAS (aviation gasoline, used by prop driven aircraft) is subject to duty at GBP0.2895 per litre. This is something the general aviation community, who generally use smaller aircraft, are most unhappy with.

Tourism will benefit from improved air transport, as would small business using the microgeneration units you propose. Small business would also benefit from being able to supply the airport - this is where some of the 7000 jobs which will be created come from.

Mi


Usual promotors bleating

28.08.2005 09:53



Climate change. There are NO reputable scientists who are now denying global warming.
Previously there were far fewer deniers than those agreeing anyway.
Even Lomborg (who's own tutor trashed his claims) now accepts that it's happening.
Bellamy has recently been exposed for pinching dodgy 'evidence' from an even dodgier
US website run by Lyndon La Rouche and has now 'retired' from the debate.
The evidence is in and the science proven beyond disagreement by corporations/polititians
(however they may try to continue to deny or spin their way around/out of it - ie: Bush and
oil giant Exxon etc plus, it seems LyddAirport)


Numbers.
Many on the Marsh were probably on their weekend break- but those just leaving in their vehicles appeared to be largely suppostive, I only heard 4 cars passing in support.
It is also typical of protests that only the committed turn up but they represent a much larger
constituency. In this case the anti's trounced the proponants by 4 to 1.

The proponants of the airport are using the 'me,now' short termist view that has brought the
world to it's current parlous state economically and environmentally.

Construction.
It is simply not true that NGO's etc oppose something merely for the sake of it. Green groups oppose only those constructions that would genuinely be damaging to the environment both in the short and long term. If others agree with us, then they join in.



pirate


Mi??

28.08.2005 11:05

"There are many reserves of oil we have not even considered tapping yet."

Please do tell us where these are Mi, I'm sure we're all very interested.

interested


sad thing is...

30.08.2005 12:11

...that Mi is not even in the pay of the oil/aviation/etc industries!

Rubbish title, rubbish arguments that had already been answered in post before you, if you can be bothered to read it. If you can't please don't keep repeating yourself.

Just 'cos people are part of an interest group doesn't mean they're not local. And anyway, the future of the planet shouldn't just concern local people! Bogus argument award to you.


I want a future


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech