Then I remembered what he was in Scotland for: relief for Africa, and it all clicked into place. As that is the hugest fucking hoax lately played on the British people, really more of the IMF/World Bank destructionists "not being able to make omelettes, without BREAKING EGGS" (aka wrecking countries even more), the reason for Mr. Blair's poorly appearance became clearer:

He'd obviously been on the piss with at least the even more "elite" (almost certainly including his bestest buddy George) of the G8 "elite". Might as well, I suppose, it's something to do, there being no real intentions, PR spin aside, to seriously address Africa's largely intentional Western generated problems.

AH! There's the explanation of the old and drawn appearance: A good piss-up can put 15 years on anyone.

How serendipitous (read: lucky bastard) that the hangover induced drawn and off-colour appearance could be put to such good use in his public addresses that day concerning his very own bombs in London.

The Prime Minister gave such a good performance that I feel he's entitled to feel that he deserved those bombs that enabled him to deliver yet more moving speeches; indeed, to feel that the opportunity to deliver those speeches was WORTH the price paid by others in the events that provoked them.

I concur. I also believe that the Prime Minister deserved those bombs.

I mean as opposed to the relatively innocent people misfortunate enough to actually be killed, have limbs or a limb blown off, permanently blinded, made permanently deaf, be otherwise seriously wounded, get lungfuls of dust, or just soot on their faces, or a few scratches or just a speck of dust in the eye. Of course, I could be referring just as well to the huge number in IRAQ that the PM has helped deliver these fates to, as much as the relatively few in London.

Yes, the Prime Minister deserves every one of those misfortunes. Proceeding in reverse order of severity, starting with the speck of dust in the eye, through the whole list, with full recovery allowed between each before proceeding with the next.

THAT would be justice.

I'm conflicted about the final item, chronologically, in this sequence, however, as a fully cognisant though limbless, deaf and blind Tony Blair might only just then begin to comprehend the magnitude and the horrors of the crimes he has helped perpetrate. In this sense, death's too good for him.

Yes, indeed, the Prime Minister deserved those bombs.

Every one of them right up his manipulative, lying, Treasonous, War Criminal Mass-Murdering bony arse.

It's all very well for the Prime Minister to state on the day of the bombings that "they" will not succeed in changing "our" way of life. As he surrounds himself with 5 mile long fences (Gleneagles) and obviously but strangely would feel less secure parading himself around the streets of London, even protected by his undeserved security shield, than Saddam Hussein, with minimal security, did around the streets of Baghdad towards the end of "Mission Accomplished" (hah! hah!), then his way of life regrettably isn't so far particularly threatened. Of course, people killed and maimed in the London bombings, as well as the far greater number in IRAQ have had their ways of life significantly impacted, to say the least. All as a result of the PM's criminal actions. He must know anyway, that in the long term, the Way of Life that the UK's is a small mirror of, the American Way Of Life (as in AWOL from the genuine concerns of most of the rest of the World) really is the problem, being quite unsustainable, irrespective of the extremist bleatings of the IMF/World Bank idealogues, and the like in the circles that Tony frequents - he really should get out more. His descendants, his "market forces" idealogue pals, if not he himself, will end up their days living in fortresses, sustained by huge, but ever dwindling stored provisions - no doubt as heavily guarded as Gleneagles was.

As I said to him in an earlier communication: "Nice World you are helping to make for your children, Mr. Blair; I sincerely wish them happiness in their privileged fortresses.". On reflection I admit I can't remember just how sincere that wish really was, I can't imagine it was very; in any case, it's retracted.

More recently the PM has made utterances concerning "extremist terrorism" or "terrorist extremism", or the like. Of course, there is no more extremist terrorist act than the waging of unprovoked war. Irrespective of the tragedy of two weeks ago in London (the equivalent of a really quiet day in Iraq), and whatever may turn out to be the details of today's events, Prime Minister Blair is the worst and most dangerous terrorist in the whole of Europe, let alone the UK. MI5, and MI6, albeit the latter seems more interested in propaganda targetting "their own" people, when it's not planning to whack the leaders of other sovereign states, should realise this and note it carefully. In terms of this Fishwick fellow episode, perhaps UK "security" services might like to take a cue from fiction, and start thinking Francis Urqhuart, as opposed to GBH. The downside to that fantasy, of course, is that it would comprise more damnable "Government" in secrecy, barring the emergence of a real patriot like Richard Tomlinson at some future date. I wonder what happened to Fishwick; has be been arrested and imprisoned for conspiracy to murder, as he should have been?

Of course, there is the assumption in the above that today's events aren't designed as a result of Tone being dissatisfied with the refreshingly high level of disbelief among the British public in his now tamed press's reiteration of the "no link with Iraq" hogwash. And of course, he gets to parade his fake sincerity on TV again; probably to use to gee up even more anti Moslem feeling in the UK, as he did in one of his speeches on the day of the London bombing two weeks ago.

Also more recently, the PM has proposed the formation of an "Islamic Terrorism" commission, or some such like. This is rich coming from Europe's Terrorist-In-Chief. What is really needed, of course, in all rationality, is a commission to address the problem of Blair's (and his Washington's boss's) much worse terrorism.

I note in passing that MI6's primary disinformation outlet, Con Coughlin, has been geeing up for war against Iran, and ?cleverly? combining that with alleged involvement of that other "Axis of Evil" member North Korea in Iran's nuclear program. So it seems that Tony has signed on for the whole deal. Tut, tut. It seems that Con Coughlin (whose Christian name, by the way, or at least so he told me, is phonetic French colloquialism for "cunt": like father like son, I guess) has come a long way since getting fired from his first, or at least an early "reporting" job for demonstrating his deeply felt devotion to democracy by slinging a brick through a constituency "Labour" Party HQ's window, in all too typical alcoholic stupefaction (never was he more honest). Or was it the window of a trade union office? Perhaps you could check that for me? Or may be not.

Were it other than the American mainstream media, I would be amazed at the coverage Coughlin gets in the US - obviously they haven't bothered to check on or more probably are just not interested in the combined reliability of he and MI6 - such as the pair's sterling work in enabling Moammar Ghadaffi's son, of all people, to win a libel case in a British Court. Not to mention Scott Ritter's testimony (including some in the House of Commons) that MI6's main interest in their interactions with him was sexing up intelligence to make the Iraq War more palatable to the British public.

I mention this, as a bit of an aside, so to speak, as I would like to modestly suggest that if MI6 concentrated less on aiding and abetting the hoodwinking of the British public (who do they think they are? the CIA?), whether or not via Con Coughlin, and more on, well, er, actual, well, er, you know, real intelligence matters, then perhaps there would be more chance in future of avoiding such incidents as the recent London bombings. That's assuming, of course, that such avoidance is actually part of "the plan".

On the other hand, the British mainstream media seem to be mimicking their US counterparts more and more closely these days, as they parrot the Establishment's poisonous bile about Iraq not being related to the London Bombs. Well done, Tony, you seem to have brought them to heel, amazing what a few fake photos planted on the Daily Mirror (probably MI6 being bad boys, again), and in the words of Blair's very own Karl Rove, Alistair Campbell, the effort to "fuck Gilligan" managed to do. The actual truth that British soldiers actually have engaged in torture and beatings (sometimes to death), and that Gilligan was absolutely correct about everything got submerged in all this. More examples of pre-emptive strikes, eh.

Please give my regards to Jack "Iraq had nothing to do with this" Straw (LIAR! as always), and the Court Jesters Bono and Bob "Live Aid never changed a fucking thing either" Geldoff.

Good day.

Some Notes to PM's staff (eyes only - not Blair's ;-):

Are you really happy working for this guy? I know career is important and all that, but have you no conscience? Do your mothers REALLY know what you do for a living?

Now, I wouldn't suggest that you being on the inside of his iron security blanket, so to speak, that you whack him; albeit that would gain the greatest respect of the majority of the World's population - and I would diligently pay respects and lay flowers at your grave every year.

But you might consider whistle-blowing, especially those amongst you who are religious, and consider that you might have the fate of your immortal souls to worry about. On the other hand, the atheist morality of life being, for each of us, the one and only once ever open window on the universe, and just how many have had that window closed prematurely, or enjoyment of it severely curtailed by Blair, should serve just as well. Of course it's understandable that the murky fate of Dr. David Kelly would cause concern here; but I believe he made the mistake of not immediately blasting his first hand knowledge and concerns to every Internet site and other outlet that might have an interest.

At the very least you could resign and take up some HONEST employment.

It's now revealed, on being told the unwarranted aggression against Iraq would be illegal, that Blair said "we have to find a way to make it legal". Boot on the other foot, there's no point in musing if the execution of the PM "could be made legal" - it already IS, under national (Treason) and international law (War Crimes).

He and his dismal cohorts ought to be tried and hung.

It's pathetic and appalling that Blair has chosen to go along with PNAC's re-hash of the several thousand year old path of Empire and foreign plunder for the enrichment of the few at the expense of unrelenting horror for the many. Down this path lies the way of no human progess, or the net result of such there has been being the threat of Bush's/Blair's modern WMDs in furtherance of such Empire, and the dismal but inevitable responses thereto, such as we witnessed in London lately.

Dennis Revell,

Former "Labour" Party member.

Item also HERE:
http://dennisrevell.home.att.net/Politico/NoteToDowningSt200507.htm