ignores vital evidence of an inside job.
Commentary
By Michael James in Frankfurt, Germany
7-10-5
Blair caught a glimpse of himself in the dresser and checked his profile. Carole, his personal image advisor, had told him to soften the pronounced jaw when seated next to Bush. "You're overdoing the Winston thing," she had said pointedly. "Killing people was yesterday; starving Africans and rainforests is now the thing." She was wrong about the killing, of course. The good Miz Caplin would never understand his rites of passage, at least not in the Brethren's sense of the term. And yet something was still bothering him.
The intelligence services had been caught off balance by Mossad's unwelcome intrusion into matters they considered a strictly British affair. Having the headline "Israel Warned Blair Two Days Before Attack" splashed across the front pages of an otherwise complicit print media was something to be avoided at all costs. Binyamin Netanyahu would go ahead with preparations for his press conference and allow himself to be "advised" by Scotland Yard shortly after the first blast. If MI5 were to dally in their attacks on commuters, he would have no choice but to claim that Scotland Yard had warned him prior to the event, and the Blair government would have to hope that the British people would not notice the obvious irregularity.
Back in London, Netanyahu dropped security protocol and looked cautiously out of his hotel window. Reflecting on his long years of experience in helping to finance and organise terror attacks on Israeli citizens to provoke world outrage against the rightful inhabitants of his stolen country, he knew that errors would be made and officials would let their tongues slip when the heat was on. Press reports would have to be altered at short notice and the volume turned up loud until all the world would hear nothing but "al Qaeda, alQaeda, al Qaeda". It had worked before and it would work again. The Goyim, whether American or British, would once more be led by the nose to believe the official version of events. Binyamin snickered inwardly at Eliza Manningham-Buller's chosen title for the fictitious terror group. The nonsensical "Secret Group of the al Qaeda Organisation in Europe" suggested to him that Manningham-Buller had probably spent her childhood reading nothing other than Enid Blyton's "Famous Five" and "Secret Seven" adventure books. Yes, that was it, the Secret Seven on the seventh of July. How apt. How very Qabalah.
Whatever, the British had insisted on bombing close to the venue at which he had been billed to deliver an important seminar, if only to give the attacks, in the words of an MI6 liason officer, "a real whiff of al Qaeda". The Liverpool Street bombing would even lift the hotel in which former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani was staying. The Prime Minister of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, was also close to the epicentre. The British government and their Freemason paymasters in the City of London were sure sending a message to the Americans and Canadians: "We're back in control of the terror game now. This time, the British Crown is playing for keeps."
But the clock was ticking, and still no word. "Hashem," Netanyahu growled softly, "deliver us from the ignorant Goyim and their slow-witted ways."
At 8.40 am, "Mad Dog" Spencer stepped into the third carriage of a subway train bound for Aldgate and Liverpool Street Stations. He knew he would have very little time to leave the package behind in a shabby plastic bag and put sufficient distance between himself and the ten pounds of high explosives strapped to a timer. The latex treatment, which had given him the facial appearance of a down-and-out, was beginning to itch. Such inconveniences would have meant nothing to him back in the days when working in Kabul with his old MI6 friend, Clive Newell. It was Newell who had introduced him to the legendary CIA asset, Osama bin Laden, then known by his American codename "Tim Osman". Those were the days: fighting the Soviets back-to-back with artificial Islamic terror groups financed out of London, courtesy of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International.
Spencer remembered Clive fawning over Osama as "our baby", and his raging against the CIA's unwarranted incursions on the British Crown's right to use the fledgling al Qaeda gang as it saw fit. After all, the British had established the occultic Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt during the 1920s for the express purpose of destroying pro-American Arab nationalism as a counterforce to continued British imperial rule and as a means to defame the world's fastest growing religion. America had paid for her obstinacy on September 11, 2001, although the Bush administration had deliberately left the gate wide open to all comers, including Mossad and the mercenary wing of the British SAS. Bush got what he wanted. Now it's our turn.
Had "J-boy" been telepathic, he would doubtless have been sharing Spencer's thoughts. They were old pals and had been through much the same thing. J-boy scanned the faces of his fellow commuters on the southbound Piccadilly Line train. They will all be dead in less than three minutes, he thought. Still, it all works to the good of Queen and country, and Tony will get his shiny new National Identity Cards. A shame it had to be a "wet job", but his many years of experience in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities in Northern Ireland and on the British mainland had shown him that only the proactive approach toward bringing things to a head delivered the political goods.
The 1974 Birmingham pub bombings. Yes, sir, that was us; and six innocent Paddies went to prison. It didn't stop there. The good times for J-boy only started in earnest when working for the maverick Gordon Kerr. As an operative for the DET 14th Intelligence squad, J-boy had killed both Republicans and Loyalists, changing sides as frequently as was required by both MI5 and the SAS. The slaying of pensioner Francisco Notarantonio was J-boy's finest moment because, in contrast to bombings with a high civilian body count, it required a level of deception unmatched in any previous MI5 assassinations in Ireland and Britain. Sir John Stevens finally ended the fun, despite MI5's efforts to kill him too. But still, Her Majesty's Government saved the day by forbidding the press from revealing any further names. Not that the press requires censorship these days - the mainstream boys do it themselves. It's a cakewalk.
J-boy allowed the package to slip neatly between his feet, and he gently sidled it into the corner of the standing room in front of the double doors to the carriage. When the train pulled into the station, J-boy was gone. He would disappear into the crowd and make an expeditious exit before the explosion would claim the lives of twenty-one "useless eaters", and leave at least one hundred survivors without vital body parts for the rest of their lives.
As J-boy vanished into the back seat of an Astra Cabrio before being driven to an MI5 safe house, Tony Blair entered the foyer of the Gleneagles Hotel with a smile on his face. He knew that the first three bombs had been detonated just split seconds apart. Mentally, he quickly ran through the lines he had prepared the night before. He would say something Churchillian with an allusion to the wartime blitz and the unfailing courage of Londoners. It would be a bravely defiant speech. Nobody would suspect that the bombings were his own handiwork. Still, until such time he would have to play dumb and wait for Jonathan Powell or Ian Gleeson to brief him officially. Powell, he knew, had not been informed, but would know soon enough once John Scarlett had apprised him of the matter.
Sir Ian Blair, London's Chief of Police, tried to sound surprised when informed of the bombings. The transport police had, as agreed in prior exercises, already briefed the press about an unexplained power surge. The rationale for such an explanation would be based on the alleged need to minimise panic and, as a helpful corollary, to maximise any potential casualties at sites where bombs had yet to be detonated. MI5 had quite deliberately misbriefed Sir Ian on the number of detonations they had planned, just to keep him sharp. This was the first time that such a hugely complex operation was known to senior figures within the British executive, Scotland Yard and the intelligence services. In fact, considering the potential for accidental disclosure, it was unprecedented in its scope and daring.
Sir Ian was nervous, and rightfully so. He had wanted to suspend all cell phone network services, but had been overruled by both Eliza Manningham-Buller and Tony Blair, the latter saying that "commuters should be given the chance to digitally record the full horror of the attacks". Yet Sir Ian knew that journalists would be curious as to why services were allowed to continue, given the widely known fact that the Madrid bombings had been detonated by mobile devices. It would be a tough call. He wouldn't, of course, be able to say that he knew well in advance that timers had triggered the explosives. He would just have to HOPE THAT JOURNALISTS WOULD IGNORE THIS SMOKING GUN and fall for the mantra their editors would insist on repeating: "al Qaeda, al Qaeda, al Qaeda." Sir Ian took a deep breath and quietly thanked Moloch in his heart for making real investigative journalism a thing of the past.
Eliza Manningham-Buller discovered a spring in her step. This was the first time she had been allowed to participate in the killing of large numbers of innocent people. It was a great day for England. It meant that she and John Scarlett would regain full control over al Qaeda and all the other terror front groups that had deserted to the CIA following Clinton's symbolic and disciplinary cruise missile attacks on the Taliban. Eliza had also been cleaning house. There were no more David Shaylers around to be blowing whistles on payments made to Osama. No more attempts to expose her protection of British-trained and financed terrorists, such as Abu Qatada, a pro-British, anti-American gentleman with impeccable manners and a heart for the Queen.
Department K had already confirmed that both Spencer and J-boy were safe and in debrief. With the Edgware Road detonation also a success, Simpson wouldn't be far behind. That just left 'Green Eagle', Lawton and Pettigrew. Blair would now have been fully informed and she would take the conference call alone. There was still the matter of the fake al Qaeda website. The DNS was still POINTING TO AN INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER IN MARYLAND, AMERICA. The Israeli intern had, according to one duty officer who speaks fluent Farsi and classic Arabic, done a poor job of the grammar and had even misquoted the ayahs selected from the Koran. MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes was already saying that al Qaeda would never have posted a statement on a secular website and that the claim of responsibility contained give-away errors. The whole thing is phoney, he scoffed. "This is not something al-Qaeda would do," he said.
Eliza, being a perfectionist and the first to laugh at the CIA's obvious home movie and audio productions of fake al Qaeda PR, was not entirely happy with substandard work. The press, however, would be cowed, online bloggers dismissed as nutty conspiracy theorists and the website pulled as soon as it had served its purpose. She could only hope that the ad hoc team charged with planting "clues" and tampering with forensic "evidence" in the subway stations would make a much better job at framing fictitious Islamic extremists. But, darling, no mini-vans full of Korans or miraculously intact Arab passports to be found within the eye of the blasts. Manningham-Buller sniggered into her coffee cup at the crass ineptitude of the Bush administration. British terrorism had always had a touch of class.
Meanwhile, all hell had broken lose in Tel Aviv. Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom had been barking down the phone to Israeli Ambassador Zvi Heifetz, enraged that the British had not acted on his warnings of an attack on the subway system, but had instead failed to communicate that this was an inside job. How dare they endanger Netanyahu's life? Now they're claiming the finance minister was warned before the attacks and are preparing a damage limitation exercise that points to Mossad in the event that things go awry. Shalom had the soon-to-be redacted Associated Press report in front of him:
(Jerusalem-AP) July 7, 2005 - "British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.
"Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said. ... Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.
"The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of his position."
Shalom was aware of the political fallout this would cause. The British were trying to spin things their way and his opposite number, John Scarlett, was refusing to take his calls. All this despite repeated warnings from the Israeli side since July 4. Yes, we told them it was going to happen, and TONY BLAIR SAT ON THE INFORMATION AND DID NOTHING.
Shalom knew that AP would eventually redact the news report (and they did: nomorefakenews.com); so he was pleased to read what Stratfor had put out:
"Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned "minutes before" the first attack, unconfirmed rumours in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks "a couple of days" previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.
"The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his failure to deter this major terrorist attack."
Heifetz ended his conversation with Shalom and eyed his liquor cabinet. If the press runs with this, he thought wistfully, Blair will be exposed as a murderer of his own people. You can kill Israelis and get away with it. You can kill Americans and they'll make you President for a second time. But the Brits are made of wiser stuff. They'll hang Blair from the highest lamppost in London.
Heifetz had also been told that Sir Ian Blair had refused to disable the cell phone networks. That's an open admission that Blair knew well beforehand that explosions were not to be triggered by cell phones. Heifetz whistled at the audacity of it all, and wondered if just one curious journalist would push the matter to its logical conclusion. Not any of the media whores from the Murdoch press, of course. Or even from the Fabian socialist Guardian newspaper. The BBC would naturally report the government-approved version of events and any embarrassing questions would be drowned out in the general cry for revenge and increased police state powers.
As reports of bus explosions hit the airwaves, Tony Blair's face animated the live feed. Flanked by Chirac and Bush, Blair went into Churchill mode and began the spin. Trying to look shocked and concerned, but inwardly full of glee, Blair let loose the repertoire he had prepared the night before. He would be returning to London to meet with police and intelligence chiefs, and he would preside over a press and propaganda control operation known as COBRA.
"A co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos," Sir Ian Blair told Sky News in a telltale direct translation of the Freemasons' Satanic motto "Ordo Ab Chao".
The British people had been fooled again. Another war is on the cards.
-----
On Saturday July 10, a British freelance journalist with a wealth of experience in sniffing out illegal MI6 activities in Germany took a stroll along the Muenchner Strasse in Frankfurt and recalled the warm summer evening in 1997 when a gun-wielding MI6 operative tried to shoot him dead: an incident witnessed by several passers-by and still on file with Inspector Werner Dietz at Frankfurt's central police headquarters. The attack only strengthened Michael James' determination to return a popular politician from enforced exile to his homeland in Kenya and to continue on African soil his investigation into the MI6 assassination of Robert Ouko, Kenya's anti-British foreign minister.
The same journalist was mulling a call from a former MI6 agent who, back in 1997, had warned him of the clear and present danger to his life. Even though he already knew that Tony Blair had been informed of the impending attacks on London, what he had been told in terms of Blair's direct involvement sounded almost too fantastical. That Tony Blair enjoyed killing Arab children was a proven fact. But British citizens on British soil? "Then tell it as a short story with the outline of events I have provided, my friend," his confidante implored. "The facts will speak for themselves."
And these are the facts: Tony Blair played a direct executive role in the false flag terror attacks on London, killing over sixty innocent civilians and maiming hundreds, possibly thousands, more. He worked in close cooperation with his namesake and fellow occultist, Sir Ian Blair, and with the head of MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller. Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, was also kept informed of events leading up to the atrocities.
The first expositor that will surely hang Tony Blair came in the form of reports by the Associated Press and the intelligence specialists Stratfor that the Israelis had been repeatedly warning the British government since July 4, and that Blair chose to ignore both Shalom and Heifetz. The AP reports, which were quickly withdrawn from public view, have been salvaged from the Google cache and are on display at nomorefakenews.com, among many other websites. The second is represented by a major blunder in planning and response, namely Sir Ian Blair's decision not to shut down the cell phone networks. That decision was based entirely on his foreknowledge that the explosives would not be detonated by means of mobile phones, as was the case with the equally suspicious events that struck Madrid on March 3, 2004, and his deferring to Tony Blair's desire for graphic images of the carnage. A third expositor lies in the fact that MI5 made a number of glaring and very telling errors in their presentation of the "al Qaeda" website, even allowing a simple DNS trace to a server in the United States.
Another anomaly may emerge in the fact that the perpetrators seem to have somehow escaped being filmed by London's vast network of CCTV cameras - a remarkable feat when one considers that the average Londoner is caught on camera three hundred times a day, and certainly more evidence that these operations were carried out by sophisticated insiders. Without a doubt, a number of Arab men will be rounded up in the days ahead and questioned by police until charges can be made to look credible.
When Tony Blair told the press that the bombings bore all the hallmarks of al Qaeda, he broke with tradition and actually told the truth. The fall-guy al Qaeda network is the bastard child of the British intelligence services and the Freemasonic terror school, the occultic Muslim Brotherhood. MI5, MI6 and al Qaeda are virtually indistinguishable. Yes, Mr Blair, the bombings bore all the hallmarks of MI5 - and you know it, precisely because it was you who authorised the attacks.
It's not the first time that MI5 has been active in perpetrating acts of terror against the British people. Recent exposures have shown that most of the bombings carried out by the Irish Republican Army during its long campaign against the illegal British occupation of Northern Ireland were, in fact, provoked, instigated and executed by undercover MI5 agents posing as Irish patriots.
This pattern of subterfuge and deception in creating terror to manipulate public perceptions has been a specialty of American and British governments for the best part of fifty years. Diligent researchers and real journalists who aren't fooled by government propaganda and the mainstream media, already know that the CIA, MI5 and MI6 financed al Qaeda during its heyday as the main organiser against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. They also know that Osama bin Laden was, and probably still is, on the CIA payroll, operating under the name "Tim Osman". The business relationship between the mercurial and sinister Bush family and the bin Ladens is well known. All of these facts can now be verified on the public record, thanks to the efforts of independent journalists and truth campaigners. Less well known is the integral role played by the British intelligence services (both MI5 and MI6) in creating, steering and financing the terror network, and also in protecting key operatives from public exposure and arrest.
Blair has obtained the results he wanted: the collapse of all resistance to the imminent introduction of National Identity Cards, the inflaming of public rage against Islam in preparation for an attack on Iran and Syria, and a distraction from the continued illegality of the Iraq war and issues that threaten to overwhelm his administration, such as the Downing Street memo, which evidences fraud and treason at the highest levels of state.
Tony Blair has one other ambition that remains unfulfilled. He has stated that he wishes to become the first ever president of a European superstate, a project recently derailed by the stunning French and Dutch rejection of the proposed European constitution. He also wishes, in his capacity as the new Prince of Europe, to remodel the European entity as a UK-US-Israeli forward base for imperial expansion in the Middle East and Central Asia; and he wishes to stamp this initiative with the imprimatur of the British Crown, forcing the United States to play the junior role in a new world order shaped by international bankers in the City of London.
The attacks on London and the forthcoming attacks on France and Germany are therefore also designed to resurrect the failing European project as the answer to the demands for increased security and surveillance and the continued negation of civil liberties - demands that will now be heard and amplified throughout the European Union by frightened and gullible citizens.
I was the first, long before Harold Pinter, to publicly call for the lawful arrest and execution of Tony Blair for mass murder and high treason, and I would like to renew that call here and now. With a wry nod in the direction of the British Consulate in Frankfurt, which has already tried to nail me for honest journalism, allow me in my capacity as one who possesses pre-degree qualifications in British Law, Constitution and Government to stress that such measures are not only lawful, but are indeed obligatory under the code governing statutes on Citizens' Arrests.
Tony Blair is a dangerous psychopath who must be stopped before he kills and maims again. According to psychologist Dr Paul Broks, his repeated lies and his lust for the blood of innocent people evidence "a plausible psychopath - charming, intelligent, emotionally manipulative, ruthlessly ambitious and self-serving." How much longer do we permit Blair to remain at large? How many more deaths and fake terror attacks will it take before men and women of courage invoke the law and apprehend this monster?
To paraphrase another serial killer, George W. Bush, if we can't bring Tony Blair to justice, we must bring justice to Tony Blair.
-----
References:
Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks
http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/stratfor-london.html
Who's Behind The Bombings In London Town?
http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=3325
See No Evil: Spinning Netanyahu's London Terror Tip-off
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/comments.php?id=2205_0_1_0_C
Al Qaeda Net Site Tracks Back To Maryland
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/alqmaryland.html
Network Not Downed
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13382604,00.html
Zionists finally strike London
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=3314
The Muslim Brotherhood: The Globalists' Secret Weapon
http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/MB.htm
British Intelligence: Her Majesty's Terrorist Network
http://www.infowars.com/pdfs/order_ch.PDF
Fomenting the "Clash of Civilizations" for a New World Order
http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/Clash.htm
Al-Qaida suspect hidden by UK agents
http://guardian.co.uk/ukresponse/story/0,11017,751102,00.html
Britain sheltering al-Qaeda leader
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2115371.stm
British army allowed IRA to bomb Ulster Pub
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm
My unit conspired in the murder of civilians in Ireland
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm
Abandoned for killing their own, British Army officers planted as terrorists appeal to MoD
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm
British intelligence sanctioned 1987 killing of pensioner to protect IRA agent
http://www.serve.com/pfc/fru/fru12022k1k.html
Army 'colluded' with loyalist killers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/2955941.stm
-----
Michael James is a British freelance journalist and translator, resident in Germany for almost 13 years. Permission to republish his work in any media is freely granted.
http://clients.rediff.com/signature/track_sig.asp
Comments
Hide the following 28 comments
Greta Story
10.07.2005 22:53
Tripod
This site is becoming a joke
10.07.2005 23:03
Qwerty
Hurrah for Tripe-odd and Squirty
11.07.2005 00:00
But of course, you're right, its all fiction - the stae is benevolent and cares deeply about us and starving Africans, and anyone who says different should be sectioned.
Thankyou for saving us from the well funded and humane loony bins that our leaders supply for our own good.
BRB
Qwerty the Spook
11.07.2005 01:25
Notice the bonehead does not even try to refute any of the very valid points made.
Crawl back under the spook-slime whence you came, dipshit.
Bubba
They're all conspiracy theories
11.07.2005 10:05
This article seems pretty short on evidence as will all theories since those responsible have probably covered their tracks pretty well. So all we can do is guess, perhaps by asking who had the most to gain. Seems like with the attention on Gleneagles the US have done pretty well of this, particularly their (non) policy on climate change.
steve
Okay, Okay
11.07.2005 10:49
Okay, if he's said this can I have a credible link to it please. I'd like to read it myself.
2. Well done our original correspondent for including links but a considerable proportion of the links are to sources which I think most of us would treat with some caution - fring "conspiracy" theory sites, and so on. Now these may, or may not, be correct but again can we see some credible sourves corroborating the details?
3. "They also know that Osama bin Laden was, and probably still is, on the CIA payroll, operating under the name Tim Osman". Again, can you substantiate this properly?
4. "He worked in close cooperation with his namesake and fellow occultist, Sir Ian Blair, and with the head of MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller. Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, was also kept informed of events leading up to the atrocities
"Fellow occultist". Hmm. Please explain. Would this be the Freemasons, the Illuminati, or someone else?
5. " most of the bombings carried out by the Irish Republican Army during its long campaign against the illegal British occupation of Northern Ireland were, in fact, provoked, instigated and executed by undercover MI5 agents posing as Irish patriots"
I've read the links, and indeed was familiar with a number of the reports already. They do make clear that a number of killings and bombings had at least some links to security forces, but nowhere do I see the piece that says "most", gives numbers of killings, or hard statisitcs. Can I please have the link?
I await these with interest.
Big Bad Boab
Almost a bullseye
11.07.2005 11:26
The aspect I have the most difficulty swallowing however, is that the Israelis, who quite frankly have the most to gain economically, militarily and politically from the one-by-one removal of those who stand against the spread of Eretz Y'Israel, a Jewish state "from the Nile to the Euphrates", would play such a passive role.
In short, I find that impossible to beleive.
The very fact the Netanyahu and Juliani in London, and Wolfowitz at Gleneagles, were present in the UK at the time, speaks reams and should be ringing alarm bells for everyone.
There is also the question whether our spooks, brainwashed to believe the lie of Defence of the Realm more than any other, could act without qualms against their own countrymen.
Traditionally, it's more common to use foreign 'contractors' to carry out domestic hits, for precisely this reason, and also as they can be either whisked away or eliminated with far less notice - eg Dr David Kelly.
In fact it is probable that the bus blast, far from being one of the bomb-placers' targets, was his last surprise - a device even he was unaware of, detonated to tidy up 'loose ends'.
It seems to me more likely that Blair, far from being the great organiser, was simply told that this attack would be happening in order to further the aims of the campaign towards a global fascist superstate, or One World Government.
The only concession he may have been able to wrend was that the devices were relatively small, and therefore the loss of life was minimal.
In my view Blair is a spineless monster and was aware of the plan, but I dont feel he had any choice in the attacks.
I agree with James that this is orchestrated and implemented from within the ranks of Freemasonry, and that much of it is financed and organised from within the Square Mile of the City of London, but what we should not lose sight of is that these are, in motive and means if not composition, essentially Zionist entities, as is the Bush administration and the British establishment.
Britain has after all, long been a bastion of the Zionist movement.
Perhaps James just missing the full reality is a genuine mistake, perhaps his 'informant' has his own agenda.
Or perhaps James would rather those of us capable of seeing through the propaganda smokescreen, dont see too far.
pentos
Fantastic Mr Fox
11.07.2005 11:29
As for all you nasty moles who keep posting here, you know that too many of us are too intelligent and practised at debate to be outdone by your naysaying. Hell, Indymedia isn't even neccessary, nor the internet, to give the British public reason and ability to end this.
Have Fun.
Ex Lex
A WORM IS AT WORK...
11.07.2005 11:34
someone
Rhis post has disappeared from the site
11.07.2005 12:25
repost from alternet | 11.07.2005 12:27
... millions thought it is a US P2OG op.
Posted by: verite on Jul 11, 2005 4:14 AM [Report this comment]
Whether a "stimulating actions" US P2OG type initiated atrocity (to maintain UK troops in Iraq) or not, the effect among an the better educated (than US) population will be to increase demand for withdrawal of UK troops now, as happened in Spain.
https://publish.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/07/317952.html
Right Bob, millions thought it is a US P2OG op.
Posted by: verite on Jul 11, 2005 4:14 AM [Report this comment]
Whether a "stimulating actions" US P2OG type initiated atrocity (to maintain UK troops in Iraq) or not, the effect among an the better educated (than US) population will be to increase demand for withdrawal of UK troops now, as happened in Spain.
http://www.markcurtis.info
Author of the book "Web of Deceit: Britain's Real Role in the
World," Curtis said: "Two weeks before the invasion of Iraq, Blair was
presented with an intelligence report saying that an invasion of Iraq would
increase the likelihood of an attack on the UK." Curtis is also the former
head of the World Development Movement.
Defining that "better educated population" ... Faux news helps us define it thus....
http://mediamatters... org/items/200507080005
Fox News host John Gibson stated one day before the attacks that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) "missed a golden opportunity" when it awarded the 2012 Olympic Games to London because if France had been selected to host the games, terrorists would "blow up Paris, and who cares?" Following the London attacks, Gibson reiterated that the IOC should have selected Paris instead of London because the British should "let somebody else be worried about guys with backpack bombs for a while."
From the July 6 broadcast of Westwood One's The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly, guest-hosted by Gibson:
GIBSON: By the way, just wanted to tell you people, we missed (sic) -- the International Olympic Committee missed a golden opportunity today. If they had picked France, if they had picked France instead of London, to hold the Olympics, it would have been the one time we could look forward to where we didn't worry about terrorism. They'd blow up Paris, and who cares?
From the "My Word" segment of the July 7 edition of Fox News' The Big Story With John Gibson:
GIBSON: The bombings in London: This is why I thought the Brits should let the French have the Olympics -- let somebody else be worried about guys with backpack bombs for a while.
— Media Matters for America Staff
repost from alternet
Homepage: http://www.alternet.org/story/23451/?cID=15350#c15350
Download this article in pdf format
Email this article to someone;
Make a quick comment on this article
repost for alternet
Those Pesky Goverment Stooges
11.07.2005 13:31
Laughing
Hey Pentos
11.07.2005 14:06
Went through BBC's news 24 live footage of thursday morning - last night. Fascinating stuff I recommend it. News 24 switches over to BBC1 for a news flash at almost exactly the same time as the bus explosion happens. While they are doing this the main screen image is CCTV (provided to the Beeb courtesy of the Met) of Euston road at Kings cross pointing towards Euston. This footage is already on a loop. Had the No 30 bus exploded 5-10 mins earlier or been delayed further by traffic... It would have exploded live on TV News 24 right outside Kings Cross station. (The No 30 bus route is down Euston Road past Kings Cross and it was heading into london) In fact I'm certain that the bus which was targeted remains in the looped footage for some time after it was diverted down Woburn Place and blew up.
Seems to me that the explosion wasn't quite timed as well as planned or we would have got nice hollywood footage to watch over and over and over. But then that's probably all just paranoid, delusional rubbish. Isn't it boys and girls?
Who wants to say I'm lying? Anyone? Remember now folks... we've been told the bus exploded at around 9.45 and BBC News 24 has the correct time displayed in the broadcast.
Come on all you moles, deny it, make me go home and capture the footage, compress it and slap it up here for everyone to see, I beseech you.
(that's not all that's on there, wow you guys are sloppy)
Ex Lex
Having a laugh?
11.07.2005 14:23
Holes, dug by little moles, angry jealous spys, got telephones for eyes.
I bet Mr Laughing that my company car is better than his.
Ex Lex
Spook Contempt
11.07.2005 15:34
How stupid do they think we are? Pretty damn stupid that's for sure. But these Eton/Harrow/Oxbridge inbred chinless wonders know only one way to treat the masses - with contempt. And boy, are they giving it to us in spades.
Their time is running out, be sure of that. Can you imagine these psychos when their wealth and money are worthless? Man, are we going to do some skewering then.
Bubba
Hey Lex
11.07.2005 15:42
The underground blasts are said to have occurred virtually similataneously. If this is the case, why then have a fourth (fifth, sixth or seventh, depending on which version of the reports we chose to accept) explosion with different timing.
Also, in terms of psychological impact, it could be argued that 2 detonations at the same location i.e Kings Cross, may detract from the overrall effront to our collective psyche - something the perpetrators would be keen to avoid.
Lastly, if the bus blast was an execution remotely detonated, whoever triggered it, needing to be relatively close by, may have had to wait for an opportune moment.
pentos
Conspiracy theory
11.07.2005 18:07
Anywone else think this could be part of a government conspiracy?
Cold Water Tap
"Should I stay or should I go now..."
11.07.2005 18:09
MI5 don't need to come here to discredit the left/automous. These loons are doing a good enough job on their own. If anything it's more plausible that all these conspiracy posters here are a conspiracy to discredit the site. But I suspect as per usual the turth is more prosaic than paranoia: these people are 100% convinced of the tripe they post!
Between the loons and the mindless yobs, I am wondering if I should just stop coming here!
I would suggest that IM bit the bullet and introduced a more credible editorial policy that at least insisted on corroboration or it will drown in "lizard people" and "mossad".
I mean, these people aren't too extreme for teh Icke forum so what are they doing here. Do they see themselves as evangelists???
And please babbling loons, don't bother with all the usual namecalling. I can see it all in my head in advance about how I am a spy/cop/lizard/psychic vampire/district valuer or whatever.
And no there isn't a "fine line" between free speech and loony ramblings.
ZZZZ
Mr Magoo
Magoo has 20-20 vision
11.07.2005 20:20
Everything the mainstream media tells us is the truth, and anything anyone says which drifts from their unassailable veracity, is clearly deranged.
Thank you for setting us all straight.
pentos
Mr Magoo! How do you do? Barffff
11.07.2005 21:29
-----Erm...Umm...decisions...decisions...Ah yes!...Bye bye, horse-arse.
I have to concur with the people here that are getting sick of all the conspiracy loons here that have turned this site into a joke.
-----Who gives a gnat's gonad whether you concur - ooh - or not. You're getting ideas above your station, boy.
MI5 don't need to come here to discredit the left/automous. These loons are doing a good enough job on their own. If anything it's more plausible that all these conspiracy posters here are a conspiracy to discredit the site. But I suspect as per usual the turth is more prosaic than paranoia: these people are 100% convinced of the tripe they post!
-----Whoaa. Down boy. Left/automous? Is that in the Highway Code? Conspiracy to discredit the site? Nah, we'll leave that to you, tosser. The cretin can't even spell "truth". I've never posted tripe in my life, laddie. Spoils the tatties, see?
Between the loons and the mindless yobs, I am wondering if I should just stop coming here!
-----Between the loons and the yobs - is that near Brighton? Erm, no need to wonder anymore, plonker.
I would suggest that IM bit the bullet and introduced a more credible editorial policy that at least insisted on corroboration or it will drown in "lizard people" and "mossad".
----You dirty reptoid. Probably Khazar, too.
I mean, these people aren't too extreme for teh Icke forum so what are they doing here. Do they see themselves as evangelists???
-----Teh Icke forum? Never heard of it. What's it like?; You naughty, naughty boy.
And please babbling loons, don't bother with all the usual namecalling. I can see it all in my head in advance about how I am a spy/cop/lizard/psychic vampire/district valuer or whatever.
-----No way are we going to please babbling loons. Like you. You can see it all in your head IN ADVANCE! Wow! That's clever, innit? Well, you said - thought - it, matey.
And no there isn't a "fine line" between free speech and loony ramblings.
----Your crudescence, gobbledygook and gibberish here has definitely made you captain of the loony ramblings team. Congratulations, O Chief Head-Honcho LOON!
ZZZZ
-------Well, would you believe it? The sheep has fallen asleep again.
Bubba
When they start arresting people.........
12.07.2005 03:28
Europe's Angry Muslims
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/FA-6_05_RL.html
"Jihadist networks span Europe from Poland to Portugal, thanks to the spread of radical Islam among the descendants of guest workers once recruited to shore up Europe's postwar economic miracle. In smoky coffeehouses in Rotterdam and Copenhagen, makeshift prayer halls in Hamburg and Brussels, Islamic bookstalls in Birmingham and "Londonistan," and the prisons of Madrid, Milan, and Marseilles, immigrants or their descendants are volunteering for jihad against the West.
With the Muslim headscarf controversy raging in France, talk about the connection between asylum abuse and terrorism rising in the United Kingdom, an immigration dispute threatening to tear Belgium apart, and the Dutch outrage over the van Gogh killing, western Europe may now be reaching a tipping point."
But no, it's all a conspiracy! The mossad brainwashed all the children of arabs worldwide with top-secret brainwashing candy and baby formula they gave them as children and now they have activated the london cells so that african debt is not wiped out. You see, the Zionazis are secretly occupying Africa! Palestine is small fry compared to africa, they want the whole continent for themselves, that's why they invented AIDS of course!
Adam
A quick question
12.07.2005 15:57
Just curious.
Xhen
Never argue with an idiot...
12.07.2005 20:07
Life is simply too short to counter every loony point. You'd think given that Indymedia give you the right to post this tripe, you wouldn't complain so much when people point out that it's total bollocks.
If I didn't know better I'd wonder if you lot are some bunch of trolls from some NeoCon site. The sad thing is I know people like you, and I know people that reckon that people like you should be on lithium or largactyle.
Tony Blair, Mossad, the CIA didn't blow up London, and there have been umpteen attempts to point out the weaknesses in these theories. Much as you'd like to twist everything that happens in the world into your egocentric paranoid agenda, you are just going to live up to the fact that most people think you are simply crackers.
To throw your argument back at you: you are unable to meet an argument you don't like by refuting point-by-point. Instead you readily grab for personal attacks.
You get the discourse you deserve!
warren bufty
Never argue with an idiot...
12.07.2005 20:11
Life is simply too short to counter every loony point. You'd think given that Indymedia give you the right to post this tripe, you wouldn't complain so much when people point out that it's total bollocks.
If I didn't know better I'd wonder if you lot are some bunch of trolls from some NeoCon site. The sad thing is I know people like you, and I know people that reckon that people like you should be on lithium or largactyle.
Tony Blair, Mossad, the CIA didn't blow up London, and there have been umpteen attempts to point out the weaknesses in these theories. Much as you'd like to twist everything that happens in the world into your egocentric paranoid agenda, you are just going to live up to the fact that most people think you are simply crackers.
To throw your argument back at you: you are unable to meet an argument you don't like by refuting point-by-point. Instead you readily grab for personal attacks.
You get the discourse you deserve!
warren bufty
You can do better than that, Tufty me old fruit
12.07.2005 21:41
-------I try not to, usually. But, what the hell, in your case I will.
"Life is simply too short to counter every loony point. You'd think given that Indymedia give you the right to post this tripe, you wouldn't complain so much when people point out that it's total bollocks."
----And what would those "loony points" be, kind sir?. Please expound. "Point out that it's total bollocks" - yeah, point out but without any valid agruments whatsoever. I have seen nothing on this site that comes close to refuting the bombings being an inside job. Perhaps you could point me to the topic(s) you're referring to. Hmm?
"If I didn't know better I'd wonder if you lot are some bunch of trolls from some NeoCon site. The sad thing is I know people like you, and I know people that reckon that people like you should be on lithium or largactyle."
----This is beneath you, sir. HAHA! Always the same shite "what you smokin', dude?". You can do better than that, surely?
"Tony Blair, Mossad, the CIA didn't blow up London, and there have been umpteen attempts to point out the weaknesses in these theories. Much as you'd like to twist everything that happens in the world into your egocentric paranoid agenda, you are just going to live up to the fact that most people think you are simply crackers."
----Holy Toledo! Give us your proof, matey! Then we can all relax and live peacefully ever after. "Umpteen ATTEMPTS" is the right phrase. And to borrow a phrase from you, if I may - they are all shite attempts, total bollocks. I don't want to twist anything - all we good, concerned people want is the truth. It's people like you who are terrified of the truth. I wonder why? Most of the people I have met and to whom I've explained the inside jobs of 9/11, Bali, Madrid and London surprisingly, and disappointingly for you, are soon skeptics of the official versions, if not inside-job total believers. And there are more and more of us every day. Relax patrician! No need to be quaking in your boots just yet. But the day will most surely come....
"To throw your argument back at you: you are unable to meet an argument you don't like by refuting point-by-point. Instead you readily grab for personal attacks."
-----And I accuse you of the same, sir, in spades. What point-by-point?. Come on, let's be having you.
You get the discourse you deserve!
----But surely you can do better than you have so far, eh? Bufty, me old fruit.
Bubba
redneck rampage
13.07.2005 09:11
Proof that Blair etc didn't blow up London? You lot are the one's asserting it the onus is one the prosecutor to prove guilt.
You are asking me to prove the non-existence of your barmy theories. It's like asking to prove that God/Father christmas doesn't exist... So, I largely have mere supposition.
Blair has nothing to gain from the attacks in London. It has made a mockery of the ID card system. It has intensified calls for accountability. Blair had to stoop to lying to get any support from his government. And he knows everyone knows that. He also knows that after the IRA no-one in this country is going to piss their pants like the yanks off the back of bombings. Having lived in London for 15 years and having narrowly missed being bombed twice, I can offer that it isn't "defiance" that London resumed business so quickly, it's because no-one was phased to start with.
The Israelis: yeah sure they could indirectly gain from this if they could be sure that it simply didn't make people want to disengage from the Middle East. Which no certainty. If any of you loons bothered to research the very subject you are ranting about before dismissing Al Qaeda as a smokescreen, you would already know why they are not likely to be an Israeli invention- I'll let you do your own research as that way you may actually learn something. A wee clue: try reading Al Qaeda's own statements.
Who else we got? A the CIA/MI5: Well if I were planning a conspiracy, the last thing I'd do is involved a massive sprawling organisation that can't keep its mouth shut.
I'll admit that a lot of things didn't add up with 9/11 and THAT whiffs of conspiracy- and who knows possibly 7/7 too. But I very much doubt simplistic institutional conspiracy in the sense you lot mean it.
Who stands to gain most from all Al Qaeda? The people who are currently raking in billions and trying to plug a black hole in the US economy would be my first suspicions if I were a detective.
The question of direct commsion: Why go to the bother of making it look like someone has been stung on the arse, when all you have to do is poke the hornets nest with a stick??? Why does it all have to read like some bad novel?
Am I denying that governemnts do bad things? No. I am just saying that you are taking a situation and twisting it to your agenda.
The funniest thing of all is if you researched Al Qaeda you'd find out that I agree that the brutal, illegal Israeli occupation of Palestine/US is obviously a major factor in all this business. But that doen't compell me to think every time a Granny is mugged it was Mossad.
Apart from that the "Israeli Waring" story is total cack. The original piece had no substance to it even on a basic information level. If that conversation really took place as you are implying where are the pertinent details? Oh yeah, I forgot, they ran half a non-story by accident...
Until you can corroborate ANYTHING you know as much as I do= shit. Conspiracy loons always latch on to stuff that can't be corroborated. Generally stuff can't be corroborated because it's crap. Not always, but mostly. So if we both know shit, what is the difference in our stances? I am not looking for ways to blame people I dislike for the sheer fun of it.
So shoe on the other foot: where is your corroborated PROOF? Where's the smoking gun?
Warren Beatty
Nights are fair drawing in!
13.07.2005 20:43
;-)
War on Beauty
I love this
14.07.2005 08:01
But guys (James, Ex-Lex and Pentos) - give some respect to the radical muslims. They sacrifice their lives on a daily basis to Jihad the West and moderate muslims. They are ready to blow themselves úp anyday, and you just give all the credit to Zionists, CIA, MI5 and so on...shame on you. Allah hu Akbar!
Can anybody please provide me with the link to James´ theory about how the Israelies launched the great Tsunami in the far East, when they where doing underwater nuclear testbombings with their friends in South Africa?
Blah Blah
Tony,George and the rest of a Gangster8 did it
15.07.2005 20:48
Is about time people of the west wake up and see the truth and stop this government sponsor terrorist act.
We must stop this zionist bastered or they will kill all of us one by one
truth seeker
e-mail: spacecreacher@yahoo.com