Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

THE G8 SUMMIT: A FRAUD AND A CIRCUS

John Pliger | 04.07.2005 14:50 | Liverpool | World

The front page of the London Observer on 12 June announced, "55 billion dollar Africa debt deal 'a victory for millions'."

The front page of the London Observer on 12 June announced, "55 billion dollar Africa debt deal 'a victory for millions'." The "victory for millions" is a quotation of Bob Geldof, who said, "Tomorrow 280 million Africans will wake up for the first time in their lives without owing you or me a penny...". The nonsense of this would be breathtaking if the reader's breath had not already been extracted by the unrelenting sophistry of Geldof, Bono, Blair, the Observer et al.

Africa's imperial plunder and tragedy have been turned into a circus for the benefit of the so-called G8 leaders due in Scotland next month and those of us willing to be distracted by the barkers of the circus: the establishment media and its "celebrities". The illusion of an anti establishment crusade led by pop stars - a cultivated, controlling image of rebellion - serves to dilute a great political movement of anger. In summit after summit, not a single significant "promise" of the G8 has been kept, and the "victory for millions" is no different. It is a fraud - actually a setback to reducing poverty in Africa. Entirely conditional on vicious, discredited economic programmes imposed by the World Bank and the IMF, the "package" will ensure that the "chosen" countries slip deeper into poverty.

Is it any surprise that this is backed by Blair and his treasurer, Gordon Brown, and George Bush; even the White House calls it a "milestone"? For them, it is an important facade, held up by the famous and the naive and the inane. Having effused about Blair, Geldof describes Bush as "passionate and sincere" about ending poverty. Bono has called Blair and Brown "the John and Paul of the global development stage". Behind this front, rapacious power can "re-order" the lives of millions in favour of totalitarian corporations and their control of the world's resources.

There is no conspiracy; the goal is no secret. Gordon Brown spells it out in speech after speech, which liberal journalists choose to ignore, preferring the Treasury spun version. The G8 communique announcing the "victory for millions" is unequivocal. Under a section headed "G8 proposals for HIPC debt cancellation", it says that debt relief to poor countries will be granted only if they are shown "adjusting their gross assistance flows by the amount given": in other words, their aid will be reduced by the same amount as the debt relief. So they gain nothing. Paragraph Two states that "it is essential" that poor countries "boost private sector development" and ensure "the elimination of impediments to private investment, both domestic and foreign".

The "55 billion" claimed by the Observer comes down, at most, to 1 billion spread over 18 countries. This will almost certainly be halved - providing less than six days' worth of debt payments - because Blair and Brown want the IMF to pay its share of the "relief" by revaluing its vast stock of gold, and passionate and sincere Bush has said no. The first unmentionable is that the gold was plundered originally from Africa. The second unmentionable is that debt payments are due to rise sharply from next year, more than doubling by 2015. This will mean not "victory for millions", but death for millions.

At present, for every 1 dollar of "aid" to Africa, 3 dollars are taken out by western banks, institutions and governments, and that does not account for the repatriated profit of transnational corporations. Take the Congo. Thirty-two corporations, all of them based in G8 countries, dominate the exploitation of this deeply impoverished, minerals-rich country, where millions have died in the "cause" of 200 years of imperialism. In the Cote d'Ivoire, three G8 companies control 95 per cent of the processing and export of cocoa: the main resource. The profits of Unilever, a British company long in Africa, are a third larger than Mozambique's GDP. One American company, Monsanto - of genetic engineering notoriety - controls 52 per cent of the maize seed in South Africa, that country's staple food.

Blair could not give two flying faeces for the people of Africa. Ian Taylor at the University of St Andrews used the Freedom of Information Act to learn that while Blair was declaiming his desire to "make poverty history", he was secretly cutting the government's Africa desk officers and staff. At the same time, his "department for international development" was forcing, by the back door, privatisation of water supply in Ghana for the benefit of British investors. This ministry lives by the dictates of its "Business Partnership Unit", which is devoted to finding "ways in which DfID can improve the enabling environment for productive investment overseas and... contribute to the operation of the financial sector".

Poverty reduction? Of course not. A charade promotes the modern imperial ideology known as neoliberalism, yet it is almost never reported that way and the connections are seldom made. In the issue of the Observer announcing "victory for millions" was a secondary news item that British arms sales to Africa had passed 1 billion. One British arms client is Malawi, which pays out more on the interest on its debt than its entire health budget, despite the fact that 15 per cent of its population has HIV. Gordon Brown likes to use Malawi as example of why "we should make poverty history", yet Malawi will not receive a penny of the "victory for millions" relief.

The charade is a gift for Blair, who will try anything to persuade the public to "move on" from the third unmentionable: his part in the greatest political scandal of the modern era, his crime in Iraq. Although essentially an opportunist, as his lying demonstrates, he presents himself as a Kiplingesque imperialist. His "vision for Africa" is as patronising and exploitative as a stage full of white pop stars (with black tokens now added). His messianic references to "shaking the kaleidoscope" of societies about which he understands little and "watching the pieces fall" has translated into seven violent interventions abroad, more than any British prime minister for half a century. Bob Geldof, an Irishman at his court, duly knighted, says nothing about this.

The protesters going to the G8 summit at Gleneagles ought not to allow themselves to be distracted by these games. If inspiration is needed, along with evidence that direct action can work, they should look to Latin America's mighty popular movements against total locura capitalista (total capitalist folly). They should look to Bolivia, the poorest country in Latin America, where an indigenous movement has Blair's and Bush's corporate friends on the run, and Venezuela, the only country in the world where oil revenue has been diverted for the benefit of the majority, and Uruguay and Argentina, Ecuador and Peru, and Brazil's great landless people's movement. Across the continent, ordinary people are standing up to the old Washington-sponsored order. "Que se vayan todos!" (Out with them all!) say the crowds in the streets.

Much of the propaganda that passes for news in our own society is given to immobilising and pacifying people and diverting them from the idea that they can confront power. The current babble about Europe, of which no reporter makes sense, is part of this; yet the French and Dutch "no" votes are part of the same movement as in Latin America, returning democracy to its true home: that of power accountable to the people, not to the "free market" or the war policies of rampant bullies. And this is just a beginning.

First published in the New Statesman - www.newstatesman.co.uk

John Pliger

Comments

Hide the following comment

'Make obscene Wealth History!'

06.07.2005 21:17

The economic issue is the heart of the matter; too many people in Britain have struggled on in want and relative poverty for far too long. If those who claim they are genuinely concerned about economic disparity in Britain are genuinely concerned, they will be prepared to accept that for some economic parity in Britain, there must be a change in wage structures, tax structures, state pension structures, a general lowering of prices for basic goods and services, re-nationalisation of public transport and a levelling of wage disparity between the well off middle classes and the poorer working classes, amongst other things. Any thing less than this, will not bring about economic justice. You have to be prepared to put your money were your mouth is. The reality is that to wipe out poverty in Britain, wealth has to be more fairly distributed, and in many ways. This is the stark reality; poor people don’t want charity, they want a fair chance to prosper and get on like everyone else. ECONOMIC JUSTICE, NOT CHARITY!

Increased taxes must be placed on the wealthy, landowners, judges and politicians and the like, and especially vastly wealthy corporations and international businesses. The increased tax on the wealthy is just, simply for the reason that those who are already wealthy will not miss an increase in tax on their already high incomes or full banks accounts. Even this tax must be just and fair and not punitive or punishing, though. And, and I feel I get to the nub of the jist here, some serious emphasis needs to be placed on the fact that most poverty IS artificial in Britain as elsewhere, and could be seriously ended if people were prepared to live within their means. That means that the poor could aspire to a decent living, the middle class on the high salaries could be content and not continually wanting more and more, and the wealthy must pay a higher level of tax. Living within means is the duty of every right-minded person.

Sooner or later, if we want to write the debt off for Africa, we will need to ask when are we going to write off the debt for the poor in Britain, and of course other wealthy developed countries. And we might also ask, why if we challenge poverty in other parts of the world, do we not challenge the growing poverty in wealthy countries?

There is too much pretension about poverty in Africa. Africa has become the ‘Philosophers Stone’ of poverty, no matter how much money is poured into it, we know that all poverty will not be ended there. However, we must tackle the worst of poverty in Africa, and be honest about tackling it. But I feel that for too long, Africa is used in some way so as to ignore the basic problems of poverty in Britain and elsewhere, and that shouting about Africa, means that poverty in Britain is drowned out or shouted down. This is not acceptable. Is ‘Make Poverty History’ only applicable to Africa, or do the concerned and the demo marchers and the anti-capitalists at Gleneagles want to challenge poverty everywhere? Do we want to challenge economic injustice in Britain, or isn’t this ‘on the agenda’? I wonder. It is true that poverty in Africa and the rest of the undeveloped world is far more savage and life threatening than in Europe and the US, but there has to be a balance of concern, and justice must prevail in Africa as well as elsewhere.

It has to be understood, and understood clearly, that the same people controlling masses of wealth in Africa are kindred to the same people controlling masses of wealth in Britain and the West. In one part of town, there is unemployment, poverty, want, unfulfilled aspirations of every kind and even lack of basic amenities, and in another part of town there is wealth, privilege, opulence, and people living well beyond their means, and having more money than they could spend in 10, 20 even a 100 or more lifetimes. If we saw one person at a table, a table full of very kind of wonderful food, and we knew that that one person could not possibly eat all the food without becoming sick or ill, would we not invite others to at least have a bite too? This is the picture of wealth and poverty in the whole world. When will more of us be allowed to sit at the table?

I address this letter to everyone who is genuinely concerned about poverty and economic injustice. If even one other person is moved after reading this, to really think about global poverty, and to see global means global and worldwide, it has achieved its purpose. Don’t think about how much you can take, think how much can you put back.

Curious


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech