But what does it matter the first time or the second time "since the illegal and degrading war on Iraq"? Incidentally, a war, that killed, maimed and injured over 100,000 innocent men, women and children? It only matters I suppose to get the second part of the paragraph into this article.
No help from the "Opposition" to stop the war, in sight
AUSTRALIA: PART-5- PRIME minister john hoWARd will meet US president george w buSHIT, British prime minister tony blair and queen 'imperialism' herself during a 10-day visit to the United States and the UK next month.
Australian Chronology June 05:
First, we had the Aust-Pakistan Accord? June 14 05.
Then, Gov't-Opposition Advocate Troops To Afghanistan? June 16 05.
Followed by, Houses raided over 'possible' political attack plans? June 23 05.
Then, hoWARd, ruddock, ellison, keelty and news ltd plotted chaos, June 24 05.
And next month, Howard's off to US, UK - Do you follow the pattern? Well, maybe all the dictators of this world are all lining up just to get down to some trade deals? But more likely than not this is agreement time for the Coalition of the Killing!
Similar, I might add to the final resolution handshake made before the illegal and degrading war on Iraq. Including the terrorist allegations made in Australia and abroad prior that war.
A pre-emptive strike here in Australia that could help bolster national security support for the war on terror on the other side of the world somewhere.
This war packed' though also appears to include, Pakistani "Presumer of trade talks", pervez mu-'sheriff'.
So it looks like Australia will be sending more troops off to war in Afghanistan after all - regardless of public opinion - in an alleged democracy.
And considering hoWARd bribes the corporate media giants already and that he now owns the Sin-ate! I 'd like to know where the opposition to the government is, besides the rapidly growing peace movement?
And correct me if I'm wrong in today's Un-Australian News this morning, back full circle at 6.06 am - More troops possible for Afghanistan. All low key mind you and didn't make the front page! In fact the original article about sending troops to Afghanistan June 16 05, was hardly seen at all and mentioned only slightly amongst the corporate media giants?
Unlike the 'alarm and affront' brought to the nation as front-page news this week about the terrorist raids in Melbourne and Sydney.
A ploy to no doubt boost public opinion that we have to do something about our national insecurity and 'the fear of being terrorised' from people on the other side of the world, somewhere!
No help from the "Opposition" to stop the war, in sight
Incidentally if you read the article - Gov't-Opposition Advocate Troops To Afghanistan? 16 June 05.
You will note another similar pattern in that article to -
Today's article from the US: Democrats make cowardly retreat on Guantanamo torture.
The Democrats seek not to curb this dangerous growth of militarism, but rather to compete with the Republicans in promoting it. Thus, their principal fire against the administration over Iraq has been directed not at ending the war, but rather at increasing the number of troops and providing them with better arms and equipment.
Sound familiar?
It will be the first time hoWARd has met bushit and blair since all three were re-elected following the Iraq war says, the Daily Terror.
But what does it matter the first time or the second time "since the illegal and degrading war on Iraq"? Incidentally, a war, that killed, maimed and injured over 100,000 innocent men, women and children? It only matters I suppose to get the second part of the paragraph into this article.
hoWARd will visit the US from July 15 to 19 and the United Kingdom from July 20 to 24.
Ambiguous
"These visits will provide important opportunities to advance Australia's foreign and trade policy interests through discussion with the leaders of these two key allied countries -- both of whom who have been re-elected in recent months," hoWARd said in a statement.
At this point he makes it sound just like the Aust-Pakistan Accord up to now it's all about trade?
But don't count your chickens before they hatch!
In Washington, he will meet bushit and senior members of his cabinet, including vice-president dick 'chain-gang' and secretary of the failed State 'condasleezza rice-cream' or should I say creampuff?
She loves us?
hoWARd: "In those discussions 'I will seek to continue our close coordination on the war against terrorism', including through our commitment to the 'rebuilding of Iraq', and our shared efforts to address regional security challenges, including 'North Korea's nuclear weapons program'," he said.
Oh! I see, is that how we "advance Australia's foreign and trade policy interests"? A right-winger wouldn't even buy the second paragraph unless it included the first bit, and the last bit about North Korea's nuclear weapons program makes his trip seem worthy to some I suppose? But if you read between the lines it's all about WAR!
hoWARd: "This will be the first opportunity to meet the new members of the US administration following President Bush's election victory in November 2004."
Notice how he mentions the "first" opportunity like it came from the article above, from the daily terror, first? Or is that just a pro-government right wing media giant trick?
Trade - war - trade - war - she loves us - she loves us not - she loves us?
hoWARd will also take part in a meeting of the International Democratic Union and meet congressional and business leaders to promote trade and business opportunities emerging from the Australia-United States free trade agreement.
"In London, I will hold discussions with Prime Minister Blair and other senior members of the British government, including Foreign Secretary (Jack) Straw," Mr Howard said.
WAR- She loves us - She loves us not!
"These meetings provide an important opportunity to discuss major bilateral and international issues of interest to both governments, including 'progress on economic and social reform', continued close cooperation in international efforts to combat terrorism and weapons proliferation and our shared commitment to assist Iraq's reconstruction."
She loves us?
hoWARd will also have an audience with the Queen and meet British business leaders to encourage further strengthening of trade and investment ties between the two countries.
Well I guess you can make up your own mind about the trip, after all.....?Your guess may be better than mine! But I'd sure hate to be a refugee in Afghanistan I don't mind telling you.
Related:
PART-1 Gov't-Opposition Advocate Troops To Afghanistan?
AUSTRALIA: Australia's federal imperialists are again considering sending troops back to Afghanistan by early next year, allegedly to help stabilise the country and continue the war on terrorism. At least that's what we're led to believe.
More:
http://www.geocities.com/publik15/archive05/2005b71.html
PART-2 Aust-Pakistan Accord?
General Musharraf is not an apocalyptic zealot like Osama bin Laden, an erratic recluse like North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Il, or a public vilifier of America, like Iran's ruling clerics. But neither is he a convinced or convincing ally in the struggle against radical Islamic terrorism, nuclear weapons proliferation and destructive dictatorship.
More: http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92651.php
PART-3 Houses raided over 'possible' political attack plans?
"Furthermore, nothing is reasonable about a raid on people's homes because for an alleged possibility. For those sorts of enquiries one should approach a 'soothsayer' and if you get the all clear only then should they approach people via the front door with the appropriate warrant to search one's home. A warrant based on concrete evidence that has been filtered by a juge or magistrate of the court to see whether the material is frivolous or vexatious."
More: http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92886.php
PART- 4 hoWARd, ruddock, ellison, keelty and news ltd plotted chaos
Now they go on in the article to describe themselves as intelligence officials? But I'm sorry to say that any group of people who ask another group of people to believe what they believe based on no evidence is amongst the most unintelligent and lost group of people the world has ever known.
More: http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92907.php
Democrats make cowardly retreat on Guantanamo torture
The Democrats seek not to curb this dangerous growth of militarism, but rather to compete with the Republicans in promoting it. Thus, their principal fire against the administration over Iraq has been directed not at ending the war, but rather at increasing the number of troops and providing them with better arms and equipment.
More: http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92942.php
Zarqawi tape 'magic'
Zarqawi, whom the US has declared is their 'demon' in Iraq, is used as an excuse for the killing over 100,000 innocent men women and children, simply described as 'Collateral Damage' by the US and its allies, who failed to count the dead.
More: http://houston.indymedia.org/news/2005/05/40279.php
Lying and bullshitting the same thing
Australia: The Un-Australian Newspaper: "AS well as all the bullshit in politics, there's even more in our metaphoric and colloquial language.
Bullshit is the subject of serious philosophical inquiry in a little book called On Bullshit, published by the 'highly respected' Princeton University Press. To the surprise and delight of the author, it's stampeding out of bookshops all over the world."
More: http://www.geocities.com/publik15/archive1/LBST.pdf
Australian Chronology June 05:
First, we had the Aust-Pakistan Accord? June 14 05.
Then, Gov't-Opposition Advocate Troops To Afghanistan? June 16 05.
Followed by, Houses raided over 'possible' political attack plans? June 23 05.
Then, hoWARd, ruddock, ellison, keelty and news ltd plotted chaos, June 24 05.
And next month, Howard's off to US, UK - Do you follow the pattern? Well, maybe all the dictators of this world are all lining up just to get down to some trade deals? But more likely than not this is agreement time for the Coalition of the Killing!
Similar, I might add to the final resolution handshake made before the illegal and degrading war on Iraq. Including the terrorist allegations made in Australia and abroad prior that war.
A pre-emptive strike here in Australia that could help bolster national security support for the war on terror on the other side of the world somewhere.
This war packed' though also appears to include, Pakistani "Presumer of trade talks", pervez mu-'sheriff'.
So it looks like Australia will be sending more troops off to war in Afghanistan after all - regardless of public opinion - in an alleged democracy.
And considering hoWARd bribes the corporate media giants already and that he now owns the Sin-ate! I 'd like to know where the opposition to the government is, besides the rapidly growing peace movement?
And correct me if I'm wrong in today's Un-Australian News this morning, back full circle at 6.06 am - More troops possible for Afghanistan. All low key mind you and didn't make the front page! In fact the original article about sending troops to Afghanistan June 16 05, was hardly seen at all and mentioned only slightly amongst the corporate media giants?
Unlike the 'alarm and affront' brought to the nation as front-page news this week about the terrorist raids in Melbourne and Sydney.
A ploy to no doubt boost public opinion that we have to do something about our national insecurity and 'the fear of being terrorised' from people on the other side of the world, somewhere!
No help from the "Opposition" to stop the war, in sight
Incidentally if you read the article - Gov't-Opposition Advocate Troops To Afghanistan? 16 June 05.
You will note another similar pattern in that article to -
Today's article from the US: Democrats make cowardly retreat on Guantanamo torture.
The Democrats seek not to curb this dangerous growth of militarism, but rather to compete with the Republicans in promoting it. Thus, their principal fire against the administration over Iraq has been directed not at ending the war, but rather at increasing the number of troops and providing them with better arms and equipment.
Sound familiar?
It will be the first time hoWARd has met bushit and blair since all three were re-elected following the Iraq war says, the Daily Terror.
But what does it matter the first time or the second time "since the illegal and degrading war on Iraq"? Incidentally, a war, that killed, maimed and injured over 100,000 innocent men, women and children? It only matters I suppose to get the second part of the paragraph into this article.
hoWARd will visit the US from July 15 to 19 and the United Kingdom from July 20 to 24.
Ambiguous
"These visits will provide important opportunities to advance Australia's foreign and trade policy interests through discussion with the leaders of these two key allied countries -- both of whom who have been re-elected in recent months," hoWARd said in a statement.
At this point he makes it sound just like the Aust-Pakistan Accord up to now it's all about trade?
But don't count your chickens before they hatch!
In Washington, he will meet bushit and senior members of his cabinet, including vice-president dick 'chain-gang' and secretary of the failed State 'condasleezza rice-cream' or should I say creampuff?
She loves us?
hoWARd: "In those discussions 'I will seek to continue our close coordination on the war against terrorism', including through our commitment to the 'rebuilding of Iraq', and our shared efforts to address regional security challenges, including 'North Korea's nuclear weapons program'," he said.
Oh! I see, is that how we "advance Australia's foreign and trade policy interests"? A right-winger wouldn't even buy the second paragraph unless it included the first bit, and the last bit about North Korea's nuclear weapons program makes his trip seem worthy to some I suppose? But if you read between the lines it's all about WAR!
hoWARd: "This will be the first opportunity to meet the new members of the US administration following President Bush's election victory in November 2004."
Notice how he mentions the "first" opportunity like it came from the article above, from the daily terror, first? Or is that just a pro-government right wing media giant trick?
Trade - war - trade - war - she loves us - she loves us not - she loves us?
hoWARd will also take part in a meeting of the International Democratic Union and meet congressional and business leaders to promote trade and business opportunities emerging from the Australia-United States free trade agreement.
"In London, I will hold discussions with Prime Minister Blair and other senior members of the British government, including Foreign Secretary (Jack) Straw," Mr Howard said.
WAR- She loves us - She loves us not!
"These meetings provide an important opportunity to discuss major bilateral and international issues of interest to both governments, including 'progress on economic and social reform', continued close cooperation in international efforts to combat terrorism and weapons proliferation and our shared commitment to assist Iraq's reconstruction."
She loves us?
hoWARd will also have an audience with the Queen and meet British business leaders to encourage further strengthening of trade and investment ties between the two countries.
Well I guess you can make up your own mind about the trip, after all.....?Your guess may be better than mine! But I'd sure hate to be a refugee in Afghanistan I don't mind telling you.
Related:
PART-1 Gov't-Opposition Advocate Troops To Afghanistan?
AUSTRALIA: Australia's federal imperialists are again considering sending troops back to Afghanistan by early next year, allegedly to help stabilise the country and continue the war on terrorism. At least that's what we're led to believe.
More:
http://www.geocities.com/publik15/archive05/2005b71.html PART-2 Aust-Pakistan Accord?
General Musharraf is not an apocalyptic zealot like Osama bin Laden, an erratic recluse like North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Il, or a public vilifier of America, like Iran's ruling clerics. But neither is he a convinced or convincing ally in the struggle against radical Islamic terrorism, nuclear weapons proliferation and destructive dictatorship.
More:
http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92651.php PART-3 Houses raided over 'possible' political attack plans?
"Furthermore, nothing is reasonable about a raid on people's homes because for an alleged possibility. For those sorts of enquiries one should approach a 'soothsayer' and if you get the all clear only then should they approach people via the front door with the appropriate warrant to search one's home. A warrant based on concrete evidence that has been filtered by a juge or magistrate of the court to see whether the material is frivolous or vexatious."
More:
http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92886.php PART- 4 hoWARd, ruddock, ellison, keelty and news ltd plotted chaos
Now they go on in the article to describe themselves as intelligence officials? But I'm sorry to say that any group of people who ask another group of people to believe what they believe based on no evidence is amongst the most unintelligent and lost group of people the world has ever known.
More:
http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92907.php Democrats make cowardly retreat on Guantanamo torture
The Democrats seek not to curb this dangerous growth of militarism, but rather to compete with the Republicans in promoting it. Thus, their principal fire against the administration over Iraq has been directed not at ending the war, but rather at increasing the number of troops and providing them with better arms and equipment.
More:
http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/06/92942.php Zarqawi tape 'magic'
Zarqawi, whom the US has declared is their 'demon' in Iraq, is used as an excuse for the killing over 100,000 innocent men women and children, simply described as 'Collateral Damage' by the US and its allies, who failed to count the dead.
More:
http://houston.indymedia.org/news/2005/05/40279.php Lying and bullshitting the same thing
Australia: The Un-Australian Newspaper: "AS well as all the bullshit in politics, there's even more in our metaphoric and colloquial language.
Bullshit is the subject of serious philosophical inquiry in a little book called On Bullshit, published by the 'highly respected' Princeton University Press. To the surprise and delight of the author, it's stampeding out of bookshops all over the world."
More:
http://www.geocities.com/publik15/archive1/LBST.pdf 
e-mail:
Homepage:
