Because of working at an old concept of magnetic field I needed to know how a body falls or accelerates under different thermal conditions. By looking for experiments or mathematical data I have noticed that nobody has ever tried it. So I tried myself and as usually if you check the event you get the big surprise:
The hottest has a faster acceleration, making the Law of falling body WRONG, and also all the other laws related to it.
The hottest has a faster acceleration, making the Law of falling body WRONG, and also all the other laws related to it.
Law of the falling bodies:
Each body increases its speed at the same rate. Not matter its weight.
THE MOVIES ARE (posted on my storage site) 42 SECONDS, SO MAEBY IT WILL TAKE A LITTLE TO UPLOAD. BE PATIENT
http://download.xdrive.com/s/3503269035HZh1INxyZlhYkavtO5&partner=plus http://download.xdrive.com/s/350326969wFGFHjW4Cyd8qsNuj9U&partner=plus The ironic fact is that I'm a student in Vedanta philosophy, which in order of better articulate its concepts tree years ago started also to study physic.
I'm working at the Vedic concept of magnetic field and a month ago a started to check for the falling body under different thermal condition and I soon realized that nobody has ever tried it.
I'll make it clearer:
IN MORE THEN 350 YEARS NOBODY IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMUNITY HAS EVER TRIED THE FALLING BODY EXPERIMENT WITH ONE OF THEM HAVING DIFFERENT THERMAL CONDITIONS.
( Just control it yourself on any search engine, it takes few minutes to get it:
www.google.com
www.yahoo.com
www.msn.com
look for any kind of INFORMATION related to the falling body EXPERIMENTS OR MATHEMATICAL DATA, with one of the bodies hotter. Do not exists)
So I have tried it myself. The first time you see it working differently it is very touching because you just realize that motion it is different then described. It just reacts differently from the beginning.
The above has been a big surprise but not the biggest. That comes with the gaseous elements:
ANY TWO GASEOUS BODY (BALOONS OF IT) SAME ELEMENT DIFFERENT SIZE, THE BIGGEST MASS HAS A FASTER ACCELERATION.
According to the gravitational law that shouldn’t happen.
The above it is just an opposite reaction, because the biggest mass should be attracted more and consequently be slower. Or at list both bodies should have the same acceleration as stated by the law of falling body. But that doesn't happen.
The only possible explanation is that the order of motion in the MACROCOSM it is not attracting but repelling.
Mostly it is opposite.
I know that it is not easy to get it, PEOPLE WENT ON THE ''MOON'' AND LATELY ON ''MARS'' WITH THE GRAVITATIONAL LAW, AND ACCORDING TO OBSERVATION IT IS NOT POSSIBLE.
Here in Bharat we use direct knowledge in these situations. We just do it.
Bring two solid bodies same size and element warm one of them up till it gets very hot, then drop them from the roof of a building (at list 5 floors to enjoy the view) , and you will see that motion it is different then described on physic books.
After that it will be really easy just to take your partner out to any amusement park and just buy two balloons of different size, drop them and observe the OPPOSITE REACTION which makes the motion to be REPELLING.
THINK ALSO THAT THE ABOVE BRING IN FEW CONCLUSIONS:
a ) The law of falling body must be redefined. So gravitational law,
b ) Galileo observed that bodies moving under the only influence of a gravitational field acquire an acceleration that does not depend upon the material or the physical state of the body. Einstein "realized" that this property of gravitational fields implied equivalence between gravity and accelerating frame of reference.
"" This equivalence became the base"" for the famous General theory of relativity.
Mostly physic must be observed again with calm. It is not easy to get how reality really works.
What it is very mysterious for me is the fact that by constantly experimenting how a body falls you automatically know if the EARTH magnetic or "gravitational " field has modified its state. VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE PLANET, and it has never been done.
Mostly seems that motions on our planet it is influenced by temperature. Maybe because the SUN it is just 99.8% mass of the Solar system and as mass it is a THERMAL MASS.
On my site ,
http://vayu61.tripod You may find also a different way to analyze the SOLAR SYSTEM data, by following the path of “”all”” the planet opposite motions and combine them you will have a very very interesting picture of it.
Best regards
Vayu
e-mail:
Homepage:
Comments
Hide the following comment
to test a physical law
02.10.2004 13:59
Hi
Having read the article you wrote I want to bring to your attention you have to test it in a controlled environment to be able to proove your claim that certain laws of physics are wrong .
You should test it preferrably in a vacuum environment, because the right books on physics state that material objects no matter their mass ( what you refer to as weight but there's a difference between mass and weight : weight is a force in relation to gravitational acceleration and can change for the same amount of mass when gravitational acceleration changes , with height or i.e. on the moon or other planets ) or their volume or outer form (size) will fall with the same acceleration when nothing else or no other force gives resistance or a further acceleration to the objects .
So testing it in the air in our atmosphere by throwing two objects from a height is no proove because there is air resistance, there can be wind as an incoming force and by using heath on an object in the air, you also brought in more energy resulting in force that also changes the resistance of the air around the object. You can get more on that by taking into account the basic teachings of thermal physics and the physics you also learn in basic chemistry , in how heath changes the behaviour of particles to begin with ( atoms , molecules ) , also in gas or heterogenic mixtures of gas such as the air we're living in .
Testing it in the air is obsolete because as you know a leaf and a grain will not reach the the soil simultaniously , that's why you can also see a bird that can stay in the air quite some time without clapping the open wings .
In the air and in nature and the environment we live in there's so much things at work in terms of force and energy , that you can't use that environment to test a law of physics in a simple way accurately ( and in any environment you have to take into account inperfections in measurement , calculation by using rounded measurements and also in controlling a test environment ) .
Greetings
Bart
Bart
e-mail:
BartS_@msn.com