Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

The British are here with Arafats approval

Oi! | 17.03.2004 22:53 | Analysis | World

I know this is a straight rip from "mainstream" media however it has escaped media coverage in the west what with Madrid, the budget or any other distraction you wish to mention filling the pages.

 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/405498.html

The British are here, with Arafat's approval
By Ze'ev Schiff

With grudging consent from the Americans, the British are now setting up two new operation control rooms, one in Ramallah and one in Gaza, for Palestinian security organizations. The money that Britain is spending is earmarked for the purchase of a new communications system, ancillary equipment and vehicles. The new operations room in Ramallah has already been completed and the facility in Gaza will be completed soon.
What is the reason for the British involvement? Aside from a desire to wield influence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the British are afraid that implementation of the disengagement plan could lead to Palestinian loss of control in the territories to be evacuated, and to ensuing chaos.

Essentially, the new installations are part of a comprehensive British-Palestinian security plan, of which construction of the operations control rooms is only part. While the Egyptians are hedging their bets on their involvement in the Gaza Strip in the event of an Israeli withdrawal, the British have jumped in. The Egyptians are ready to train Palestinian security forces if and when Israel pulls out. Conversely, the British are prepared to intervene even before the IDF withdraws or the settlements are evacuated.

The British involvement will go well beyond technical-operational aspects, and bears a diplomatic flavor. A British representative recently met with Yasser Arafat in order to report details of the plan to him. Arafat has his conditions, of course, which he has not been able to win from the Americans; he wants everything to be handled his way. When Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia visited London last week, the British-Palestinian security plan was one of the issues raised by Prime Minister Tony Blair at their meeting. Qureia was familiar with most of the operational details, as Palestinian representatives have been holding talks with the British on the subject for some time, except that Arafat forbade him from dealing with security matters. Qureia - as opposed to his predecessor, Mahmoud Abbas - is more disciplined, and avoided getting into any trouble with the boss.

The American go-ahead for British involvement was granted reluctantly and on a limited basis, and only after Blair's personal appeal to President Bush. At first, the British had a hard time getting an unequivocal answer from Israel, until the British Foreign Office submitted a semiformal application to Israel, through what is called in diplomatic language a "non paper." Israel then replied that it would not cooperate with a program directed by Arafat. The request related not only to the operations rooms but also to a more detailed security program. The reasons for the Americans' and the Israelis' unwillingness to cooperate with the Palestinians on this issue are basically identical: Arafat's direct involvement in implementing the plan, and his condition that nothing happen without his say-so.

Experts in Israel believe that the British have sincere intentions, but harbor immense suspicion of the Palestinians. It is strange that Britain is prepared to cooperate with Arafat on security matters, since he has declined to take a single step toward implementing reforms in the Palestinian security organizations (among other things, reducing the number of men under arms, and ensuring their genuine subordination to the prime minister or the interior minister). The fact that he is the boss and that everything has to go through him, including all security matters, does not justify cooperation with him under these conditions. If the postponed meeting between Qureia and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon takes place and Qureia raises the matter, he will presumably be met with a negative answer to the proposal for cooperation, in the same way that were he to request that he be consulted on the disengagement plan, this too would be turned down.

It is altogether possible that nothing will come of the current British or Egyptian attempts at involvement, before the implementation of Sharon's disengagement plan begins. But if and when the disengagement does begin, we will begin to see increasingly more involvement of foreign countries in the area. For example, the Americans head the international observers force - the MFO - that oversees demilitarization of the Sinai. At least in theory, the strip of land through which the "Philadelphi" route passes (at the southern edge of the Gaza Strip) lies within its jurisdiction. If Israel withdraws from the route, it would be only natural for the international force in the Sinai to be involved. Because the withdrawal is unilateral and not in the framework of an agreement, it is doubtful that Israel could prevent the Palestinians from steps such as inviting international representatives, unless the step could be considered as an act of war.


Oi!
- Homepage: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/405498.html

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech