Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

EU's new IP Law: "You just have to trust us".

FFII (posted by spanner) | 21.02.2004 14:25 | Culture | Globalisation | Technology | World

The EU Parliament's Legal Affairs committee is set to rubber stamp a new text on Monday for the controversial EU Directive on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, despite serious unanswered concerns from across the EU -- including the UK House of Lords. It will have been only six days since the final text, drafted in secret without any public analysis of its detailed national implications, was finally released to the European public.


In the words of one MEP speaking at a meeting in Strasbourg last week, "This is Europe, not London. This is how we do things here. You just have to trust us". [1]

FFII is very concerned that, without better defined safeguards, the Directive will lead to a far more agressive, lawyer-driven legal environment for creative businesses; and having seen how such legislation can be used in the United States, that it may provide the means for agressive litigators holding dubious intellectual property rights to "pull a SCO" and use the powers of the Directive to seriously harass and even inflict lasting damage on small innovative businesses.

WIDENED SCOPE

Originally intended as a measure to stamp down hard on organised criminal counterfeiting and piracy, the scope of the legislation has been widened to apply to all species of intellectual property cases -- including routine commercial disputes, and the American-style pursuit of individual teenage internet filesharers.

Legitimate companies of all sizes are concerned about the unpredictable effects of such an enormous increase in the availability of the so-called "nuclear weapons" of IP enforcement law, to civil legal disputes of all scales, and to states where they have been no part of the legal tradition.

These include measures such as Anton Piller orders (secret court authorisations of raids for evidence by the plaintiff's agents -- Article 8); Mareva injunctions (freezing of assets, even before a case has been discussed in Court -- Article 10.1); new powers to demand the disclosure of very extensive commercial and personal information (Article 9); and the admissibility of denounciations by anonymous witnesses as court evidence (Article 8.5).

In Europe these kinds of investigatory procedures are more usually associated with criminal proceedings with a much higher standard of proof, and are quite alien to the civil (non-criminal) justice systems of most of the member states.

HOUSE OF LORDS

In June an earlier draft of the Directive was examined by a House of Lords scrutiny committee, chaired by Lord Scott of Foscote, the Law Lord who wrote the 1996 "Supergun" Arms to Iraq report, and who was Head of Civil Justice in the UK from 1995 to 2000. The committee noted that "This is an ambitious proposal which may have far-reaching implications for the law of most Member States", and they expressed concern that:

* "We would welcome a detailed assessment on the compatibility of Articles 7-9 with domestic law and the challenges they may pose for human rights".
* "We would like to emphasise the need for the Government to conduct extensive consultations on this important proposal, in particular with the Patent Judges".
* "We request the Government to provide a Regulatory Impact Assessment specifically directed at the implications of the proposal for the UK".

No public assessment has yet been published on any of these points; and the House of Lords committee has so far still declined to clear the Directive.

FFII'S VIEW

FFII fully supports firm action to crack down on organised counterfeiting and piracy. But FFII believes that in its present form the Directive is seriously unbalanced, will encourage opportunistic legal threats, and will create a much more hostile legal environment for small creative businesses.

FFII believes that the best course would be for the directive to be limited to its original proposed scope, namely commercially organised recklessly intentional copyright and trademark infringement.

Above all, FFII would like to see:

1. Disputes about patents and trade secrets/confidential information taken out of the scope of the directive altogether. The draconian measures being discussed are completely inappropriate for such complex disputes.
2. The Directive should only apply where there is intent to infringe for commercial gain on a commercial scale. It should not apply unless there is good evidence of recklessness or a deliberate knowing intention to infringe.
3. Articles 7 to 10 should even then only apply in exceptional cases. It should be clearly stated in the Directive that they are not intended to become automatic standard procedure in all IP disputes.

FFII also believes that to allow proper public discussion and analysis in all the member states, the Parliament should allow at the very least a clear month from the publication of the Council draft text (17 Feb 2004) until the final closing date for amendments. This Directive is simply too important to get wrong.

FURTHER INFORMATION:

Membership of the House of Lords committee, with links to biogs:
 http://www.ffii.org.uk/ip_enforce/house_of_lords.html

Quotes about the dangers to legitimate businesses
 http://www.ffii.org.uk/ip_enforce/legitimate.html

Legislative timetable, and contact details for relevant UK MEPs
 http://www.ffii.org.uk/ip_enforce/timetable.html

Proposed safeguards, and why FFII believes they are inadequate
 http://www.ffii.org.uk/ip_enforce/safeguards.html



Official text of the directive:
 http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/04/st06/st06376.en04.pdf

Foundation for Information Policy Research pages on the Directive
 http://www.fipr.org/copyright/ipr-enforce-plenary.html
 http://www.fipr.org/copyright/draft-ipr-enforce.html


CONTACT:
For further information, please contact:

James Heald,
UK Co-ordinator, FFII
Chilworth Manor, Chilworth, Guildford GU4 8NL.

(01483) 575174 / 0778910 7539
 j.heald@ffii.org.uk

Permanent URL of this Press Release
 http://www.ffii.org.uk/releases/040219_trust.html

[1] Mercedes Echerer MEP, speaking 11.02.2004

FFII-UK ( http://www.ffii.org.uk/) is the UK volunteer group of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII), a Europe-wide non-profit association registered in Munich.

FFII campaigns to promote competition and innovation in the field of software development. We seek a positive environment for the development of information goods, based on copyright, free competition, and open standards.

More than 700 companies and 50,000 registered supporters have entrusted the FFII to act as their public voice in the area of exclusion rights (intellectual property) in data processing; and the FFII/Eurolinux petition against software patents now has over 300,000 signatories.

FFII (posted by spanner)
- Homepage: http://www.ffii.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following comment

slashdot are running this also

21.02.2004 17:00

./


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech