That's how and why the Westminster system is flawed because it's full of clowns who investigate themselves. When will Government, Monarchs and police stop investigating themselves? When the government goes straight!
Prince Charles and his sons William and Harry are said to be devastated by the decision of Royal Coroner Michael Burgess to seek a Scotland Yard investigation into the death of Princess Diana when it is clear as the nose on your face that Charles is guilty as sin?
I feel so sorry for William and Harry to have to question, through the back door, that their father and the authorities could have killed their mother and lied to them about it.
But was it for the sake of a Title? Frustration? Rage? Or Royal Pride? Nevertheless this process will take a long time to be integrated by William and Harry.
My reason to suggest that Charles is guilty? Is that it has taken such a long time to get the Royal Coroner on the job. No matter what the excuse this was an extraordinary death. Then when Scotland was about to go ahead with a Coronial Inquest suddenly the UK jumped up to get the job. This shows how manipulative The Monarchy and The Westminster System can be. Flawed?
In my mind the out-come is clear if this is the way we are expected to believe it will be investigated. After all how could a top UK cop and a Royal Coroner get it wrong? So very convincing?
That's how and why the Westminster system is flawed because it's full of clowns who investigate themselves. When will Government, Monarchs and police stop investigating themselves? When the government goes straight!
Then we have the letter from Princess Diana her self expressing her fears with accurate details of how she was going to be taken out.
The public surely has no confidence in the top dog at Scotland Yard not to do the right thing by the Royals and as for the Royal Coroner forget it he will take his recommendations from Oink Oink!
The fact is police don't solve crime they never have done.
When you read a story about how a cop solved a crime 9 times out of ten the cop fell over it because someone give the offender up. Eight times out of ten police found a prime witness. High profile cases have to get solved for public confidence so 7 times out of 10 they are manipulated events that take a long time to procure under the guise of Noble Cause Corruption.
There needs to be an independent inquiry into the forces behind the scenes that acted for and on behalf of England? The Westminster System?, The Monarchy? Right down to Charles himself because surely they did not act on behalf of the people in their quest for purity.
With respect for Lady Diana? Herself? Diana, who was perceived as mostly kind and graceful by the World and certainly not described as mentally ill, depressed about her new love etc as media reports have suggested. And this is the other reason why Charles is Guilty as Sin? Question the validity of the elements of propaganda purported by those who would otherwise have you believe that it was an accident.
Monarchs, consorts, and, rarely, very distinguished statesmen?
Don't stress out because the Uk's top cop is on the job to investigate? And having no competing interests?
Gladstone in 1898, followed by, in the last century, King George VI [1952], Queen Mary [1953] and Sir Winston Churchill [1965]. In April 2002 several hundred thousand people queued to pay their respects to Queen Elizabeth, the late Queen Mother, as she lay in state in Westminster Hall.
Is the Westminster System flawed?
http://www.geocities.com/gregskables/archive/2002a15.html
THE UN-AUSTRALIAN REPORTS FROM THE TIMES:
The mood at Clarence House, Prince Charles's official residence in London, was described as one of "bewilderment and disbelief" following Mr Burgess's announcement on Tuesday.
The royal family received no warning about the new investigation, learning of the decision through news reports.
Prince Charles is now braced for another 18 months of damaging leaks from the police inquiry and further conspiracy theories about Diana's August 1997 death in a Paris car crash.
There is also no question now of he and Camilla Parker Bowles declaring their intention to marry until after the conclusion of the inquest, which could take 18 months.
A friend of Prince Charles said: "This is so hurtful for the prince and the boys. It is sad for everyone concerned. Diana died in tragic circumstances, which have been endlessly investigated in France.
"The princes so wanted to be able to put this to rest. Now it will be impossible. This new inquiry will legitimise even more lurid speculation because the rumours are now to be the subject of a police inquiry.
"We have a terrible sense of 'here we go again'."
I INTERPOLATE HERE:
How did it hurt Diana? How did it hurt William and Harry? How did it hurt the World losing Diana? And what damage will be done to the Westminster System if they go out of their way to cover it up? What damage will be done if they don't cover it up?
THE TIMES:
Such fears were immediately realised when London tabloid the Daily Mirror named Prince Charles as the person Diana suspected of plotting to kill her, so he could wed Ms Parker Bowles.
Clarence House refrained from any public comment about the allegation which, privately, courtiers regarded as "ridiculous". A spokesman said: "We are not commenting on this, I am afraid, but of course will co-operate with any new inquiry."
The Mirror reported that Diana claimed in a handwritten letter to former royal butler Paul Burrell that: "This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous -- my husband is planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry."
The letter was written 10 months before she died. The marriage had ended two months earlier. The letter was included in Mr Burrell's book A Royal Duty but the name of the individual identified by the princess was blanked out by the publishers.
While the Mirror claimed for the first time yesterday that Diana had written "my husband", the words were once again blanked out by the newspaper in the reproduced letter.
The omission of the phrase prompted the charge from the royal family that the newspaper did not in fact have a copy of the letter in which the two words were spelt out.
Mr Burrell maintained that the letter indicated the "evidence of the state of the princess's mind in the final months of her life".
But even the Mirror admitted in an editorial that the claim against the Prince of Wales would be seen as "utterly preposterous to many people".
There was also disbelief yesterday at Althorp, the ancestral seat of Diana's family. The Spencer family declined to comment but a friend said: "There have been mountains of rumours and speculation, which we would dearly like cleared-up.
"We have always sought to avoid becoming involved in any speculation and are not convinced that a new police inquiry will do that."
Mr Burgess is also conducting an inquest into Dodi's death. Dodi's father, Mohammed Fayed, was present at the hearing.
Outside, he accused the Duke of Edinburgh of being "a racist to the core" but said he hoped that the inquest would unravel the truth.
"It is absolutely black and white; it is a horrendous murder," Mr Fayed said, for the umpteenth time, but still with feeling.
THE DOG: But even the Mirror admitted in an editorial that the claim against the Prince of Wales would be seen as "utterly preposterous to many people" BUT they still printed what 80 per cent of the world believes.
You can't help putting question marks along side these statements because like Pythagoras of Samos Born: about 569 BC in Samos, Ionia and who Died: about 475 BC http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Pythagoras.html
It is my understanding the myth of Pythagoras amongst other things was that he was chained by both hands. Hand in hand in a line together with others linked together facing the front. The image he had seen all his life he believed in.
Suddenly he broke from the chains and turned around to look behind him and what he saw was the truth and what he'd been looking at all his life was a reflection of what he had thought was the truth.
Go on! Break free from the chains and open yourself up there is no other way.
GIVE US YOUR FEEDBACK
IS THE WESTMINSTER SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT FLAWED?
SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATE ITSELF?
I feel so sorry for William and Harry to have to question, through the back door, that their father and the authorities could have killed their mother and lied to them about it.
But was it for the sake of a Title? Frustration? Rage? Or Royal Pride? Nevertheless this process will take a long time to be integrated by William and Harry.
My reason to suggest that Charles is guilty? Is that it has taken such a long time to get the Royal Coroner on the job. No matter what the excuse this was an extraordinary death. Then when Scotland was about to go ahead with a Coronial Inquest suddenly the UK jumped up to get the job. This shows how manipulative The Monarchy and The Westminster System can be. Flawed?
In my mind the out-come is clear if this is the way we are expected to believe it will be investigated. After all how could a top UK cop and a Royal Coroner get it wrong? So very convincing?
That's how and why the Westminster system is flawed because it's full of clowns who investigate themselves. When will Government, Monarchs and police stop investigating themselves? When the government goes straight!
Then we have the letter from Princess Diana her self expressing her fears with accurate details of how she was going to be taken out.
The public surely has no confidence in the top dog at Scotland Yard not to do the right thing by the Royals and as for the Royal Coroner forget it he will take his recommendations from Oink Oink!
The fact is police don't solve crime they never have done.
When you read a story about how a cop solved a crime 9 times out of ten the cop fell over it because someone give the offender up. Eight times out of ten police found a prime witness. High profile cases have to get solved for public confidence so 7 times out of 10 they are manipulated events that take a long time to procure under the guise of Noble Cause Corruption.
There needs to be an independent inquiry into the forces behind the scenes that acted for and on behalf of England? The Westminster System?, The Monarchy? Right down to Charles himself because surely they did not act on behalf of the people in their quest for purity.
With respect for Lady Diana? Herself? Diana, who was perceived as mostly kind and graceful by the World and certainly not described as mentally ill, depressed about her new love etc as media reports have suggested. And this is the other reason why Charles is Guilty as Sin? Question the validity of the elements of propaganda purported by those who would otherwise have you believe that it was an accident.
Monarchs, consorts, and, rarely, very distinguished statesmen?
Don't stress out because the Uk's top cop is on the job to investigate? And having no competing interests?
Gladstone in 1898, followed by, in the last century, King George VI [1952], Queen Mary [1953] and Sir Winston Churchill [1965]. In April 2002 several hundred thousand people queued to pay their respects to Queen Elizabeth, the late Queen Mother, as she lay in state in Westminster Hall.
Is the Westminster System flawed?
http://www.geocities.com/gregskables/archive/2002a15.html THE UN-AUSTRALIAN REPORTS FROM THE TIMES:
The mood at Clarence House, Prince Charles's official residence in London, was described as one of "bewilderment and disbelief" following Mr Burgess's announcement on Tuesday.
The royal family received no warning about the new investigation, learning of the decision through news reports.
Prince Charles is now braced for another 18 months of damaging leaks from the police inquiry and further conspiracy theories about Diana's August 1997 death in a Paris car crash.
There is also no question now of he and Camilla Parker Bowles declaring their intention to marry until after the conclusion of the inquest, which could take 18 months.
A friend of Prince Charles said: "This is so hurtful for the prince and the boys. It is sad for everyone concerned. Diana died in tragic circumstances, which have been endlessly investigated in France.
"The princes so wanted to be able to put this to rest. Now it will be impossible. This new inquiry will legitimise even more lurid speculation because the rumours are now to be the subject of a police inquiry.
"We have a terrible sense of 'here we go again'."
I INTERPOLATE HERE:
How did it hurt Diana? How did it hurt William and Harry? How did it hurt the World losing Diana? And what damage will be done to the Westminster System if they go out of their way to cover it up? What damage will be done if they don't cover it up?
THE TIMES:
Such fears were immediately realised when London tabloid the Daily Mirror named Prince Charles as the person Diana suspected of plotting to kill her, so he could wed Ms Parker Bowles.
Clarence House refrained from any public comment about the allegation which, privately, courtiers regarded as "ridiculous". A spokesman said: "We are not commenting on this, I am afraid, but of course will co-operate with any new inquiry."
The Mirror reported that Diana claimed in a handwritten letter to former royal butler Paul Burrell that: "This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous -- my husband is planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry."
The letter was written 10 months before she died. The marriage had ended two months earlier. The letter was included in Mr Burrell's book A Royal Duty but the name of the individual identified by the princess was blanked out by the publishers.
While the Mirror claimed for the first time yesterday that Diana had written "my husband", the words were once again blanked out by the newspaper in the reproduced letter.
The omission of the phrase prompted the charge from the royal family that the newspaper did not in fact have a copy of the letter in which the two words were spelt out.
Mr Burrell maintained that the letter indicated the "evidence of the state of the princess's mind in the final months of her life".
But even the Mirror admitted in an editorial that the claim against the Prince of Wales would be seen as "utterly preposterous to many people".
There was also disbelief yesterday at Althorp, the ancestral seat of Diana's family. The Spencer family declined to comment but a friend said: "There have been mountains of rumours and speculation, which we would dearly like cleared-up.
"We have always sought to avoid becoming involved in any speculation and are not convinced that a new police inquiry will do that."
Mr Burgess is also conducting an inquest into Dodi's death. Dodi's father, Mohammed Fayed, was present at the hearing.
Outside, he accused the Duke of Edinburgh of being "a racist to the core" but said he hoped that the inquest would unravel the truth.
"It is absolutely black and white; it is a horrendous murder," Mr Fayed said, for the umpteenth time, but still with feeling.
THE DOG: But even the Mirror admitted in an editorial that the claim against the Prince of Wales would be seen as "utterly preposterous to many people" BUT they still printed what 80 per cent of the world believes.
You can't help putting question marks along side these statements because like Pythagoras of Samos Born: about 569 BC in Samos, Ionia and who Died: about 475 BC
http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Pythagoras.html It is my understanding the myth of Pythagoras amongst other things was that he was chained by both hands. Hand in hand in a line together with others linked together facing the front. The image he had seen all his life he believed in.
Suddenly he broke from the chains and turned around to look behind him and what he saw was the truth and what he'd been looking at all his life was a reflection of what he had thought was the truth.
Go on! Break free from the chains and open yourself up there is no other way.
GIVE US YOUR FEEDBACK
IS THE WESTMINSTER SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT FLAWED?
SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATE ITSELF?
e-mail:
Homepage:
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
No big deal
08.01.2004 01:52
The behind-scenes controllers with their whitewashing top-dogs have nothing to fear
Hutton is simply warned by Blair - dont do the truth
This is a new game - unlike anything we experienced before
Everything is so clear and evident and in our faces
Time for new slogans as above
dh
But why Di?
08.01.2004 16:26
Afinkawan
There are much easier ways to kill people!
08.01.2004 17:39
sceptic
Murderer!
08.01.2004 23:22
Before her untimely death, Diana Spencer had enough foresight to provide the motive and method for her murder, stating plainly in writing that her husband was planning a car crash, that he may go public with his consort, whom the Prince of Wales hoped with the right PR would be his future Queen, and Camilla could never compete with the popular, humanitarian Princess, alive…
England’s Rose, who had become a thorn in The Firm’s side had to be wrenched out and its delicate petals scattered asunder to allow the Windsor’s, with their protocols, to reclaim the limelight. Now, we have Anne and her killer dogs with a thirst for blood to focus on and Charles, sodomising his servants, but the Royals are above the law, so ‘men in grey suits’ will be working frantically behind the scenes to exonerate the Prince of any blame.
The emphasis of the UK inquiry (in the media) will be on Diana’s “state of mind” and her vain imaginings. The fact that her “paranoid” prediction was realised and she died in the mangled wreckage of a Mercedes, will be dismissed as pure coincidence, while the pansy Prince will be portrayed as an “innocent victim” of press persecution and “conspiracy theories” bewailing; “how much more can I take?”
People don’t want to believe the House of Windsor killed Diana, but it is so glaringly obvious, it will take a weapon of mass distraction to bury the story. The Coroner has postponed the overdue inquest for yet another year, to give Sir John Stevens more time to remove anything or anyone that can further implicate Prince Charles in this murder… Paul Burrell and Trevor Reece-Jones, beware!
If the truth was to come out and the grief witnessed at Diana’s funeral turned to anger, the Royal Family will never be able to appear before their subjects ever again, and it could spell the end of the monarchy as we know it. With the Queen as the figurehead of the New World Order, that can never be allowed to happen, so Diana’s death will go down the memory hole and TV producers will rewrite a rosier Royal history.
Poirot
MURDERER!
09.01.2004 05:01
Why not?
If you were innocent why would you not want the impartiality, objectivity and independents of a tribunal to look into the death and seek the truth FOR YOUR COUNTRY.
Only if you were guilty would you oppose such an option.
Only if you were guilty would you not go on a hunt to find the real truth.
It seems in this case Princess Diana just wasn't worth it. I find that incredible.
Even the French went to get the black box from that plane that just crashed while people were screeming it was no terrorist act.
The fact that they have resisted trying to make their own findings and point the blame tells you something I hope.
For everyone’s sake.
As for SCEPTICAL THAT IS HOW YOU MAKE IT LOOK LIKE IT WAS AN ACCIDENT I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT! IF IT WERE EASY THEN IT WOULD HAVE LOOKED LIKE A MURDER.
AUSTRALIA
So What?
09.01.2004 15:56
Danger
What is What - and today's Times Headline.
10.01.2004 19:02
If she was killed, the most likely reason was to remove her influence from her children, they were quickly packed off to the upper class English indoctination center soon after her death.
Now Fun and Games on the front page of The Times today 10 jan: The Chauffeur's blood test was so full on Carbon Monoxide he could not have walked. It was probably blood from an attempted suicide.
DarkerCloud