I was very impressed by all the trouble a brutal dictator like Hitler would go through to create fictitious justifications for invasions. It illustrates that even in a fascist state, where people are under repressive control, those in power are still very concerned about public opinion. In a country like the United States with many democratic institutions, one would think that the leaders would be even more worried about public opinion and create even more elaborate excuses than the Nazis. Here are some of the excuses for wars used by the United States: eliminating weapons of mass destruction, stopping ethnic cleansing, liberating people from oppression, bringing them democracy and free markets, stopping communism, protecting American lives in foreign countries and fighting terrorism. Ostensibly, Panama was invaded to catch a drug dealer. Sometimes, the United States, like the Nazis, uses fabricated incidents like the fictitious Gulf of Tonkin attack by the North Vietnamese, which was concocted to enrage the American public and allow the US to invade South Vietnam. The truth is only permitted to come to light years later, when it no longer matters. Another fabrication was the report of Iraqi troops throwing babies from their incubators during the invasion of Kuwait.
Why would the leaders of capitalist countries lie continuously and prolifically and fabricate incidents to justify wars of aggression? The answer is that they simply cannot tell common people that the real reason for all these wars is to make the world safe for the Fortune 500 and enable corporate control over natural resources and cheap labor. Most people are not willing to have their sons or daughters die or come home disabled for such a goal. Therefore, capitalist governments must use all their imaginative powers to fool the ordinary people into thinking that the war is actually defensive in nature or for some noble purpose like preserving democracy and freedom
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
A good concise article.
03.10.2003 05:48
Redkop
Iraq is now free though
03.10.2003 10:27
If the British left truely upheld democracy, human rights and freedom then they would have been fully behind the war to oust Saddam. Saddam was tyrant who stood for everything that the left is against!
Rockwell
Good article
03.10.2003 17:31
redfish
Cambodia for Rockwell
03.10.2003 23:40
http://www.tarpley.net/bush14.htm
"Chapter -XIV- Bush in Beijing"
If pressed for time read up the para 'Target Cambodia'.
An absolute must for Rockwell/IMC censor who deleted my previous comment.
Iraq is another potential Cambodia in the making.
Hallmarks -- prolonged war since 1991 featuring the Bush dynasty.
ram