Dr Nick Kollerstrom, a disgraced holocaust denier who lost his fellowship at UCL last year after his views were made public, was to appear at a talk at Conway Hall next Tuesday 30th June, however, Conway Hall appear to have now cancelled the event after a barrage of complaints.

Kollerstrom was due to talk about his views about what happened during the 7/7 London bombings. He has recently had a book published on the subject.

Please read the following about 7/7 which has resurfaced in the comment section of the previous posting about Kollerstrom:
Ref:  http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/06/433062.html

The following has been posted as a comment attached to this posting:

Kollerstrom is an idiot to have views like this; what a waste of an otherwise thoughtful, inquisitive, investigative and insightful mind. However, his recent book on 7/7 is also flawed for, though thoroughly researched, he makes too many broad based sweeping statements which only go to discredit any contrary view to the official narrative. I recommend people read Nafeez Ahmed's well researched and non-hyperbolic book on 7/7 entitled 'The London Bombings', instead. Sticks to the facts simply, without veering off on one. The intelligent rreader can make up their own mind on why Visor Consultants where running a mock-terror drill the same morning at exactly the same 3 stations (KingsX, Adldgate & Edgware Rd).

Also, check out:  http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=17444
Also:  http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/
&: Film: 7/7 Ripple Effect:
 http://www.livevideo.com/video/CTCC/A4C62936F0294BE4BD69B7E235E65B67/7-7-ripple-effect.aspx


7/7 evidence of inside job
25.06.2009 02:57
Consider the following:

1). How Visor Consultants were running a terror drill at exactly the same 3 stations where the bombs went off at exactly the same time on the morning of 7/7/2005.

2). How the 'Stratfor Intelligence Agency' reported that the Met Police gave Benjamin Netanyahu warning the bombs were going to happen 10 minutes before they happened. The Met police then denied they had informed Mr Netanyahu and that they had prior knowledge of the attack, and 2 weeks after, Mossad Chief Meir Dagan admitted he had informed Mr Netanyahu of the bombs ten minutes before they exploded at 08.40am on 7/7/2005.(This could be explained by factthat Mossad simply have better intelligence - though it doesn't corroborate easily with the explanation of Visor Consultant's chief exec at the time Peter Power, who claimed that a group of rich Jewish businessmen wanted them to carry out the drill).
Ref:  http://www.livevideo.com/video/CTCC/A4C62936F0294BE4BD69B7E235E65B67/7-7-ripple-effect.aspx

3). Reports state that there were no witnesses who verified that they saw any of the alleged bombers or unattended backpacks in the carriages where the bombs went off, and that there were holes in the floor of the train after the explosions and that metal on the track where the bombs exploded was pointing upwards after the blast (witness - Bruce Lait from Cambridge) . The bombs were comprised of military grade explosives, yet the bombs were reported to be homemade explosives, which would not cause the same amount of damage (testimony of French anti-terrorist expert Christophe Chaboud, brought in the advice Scotland Yard).

4).The mysterious lack of cctv footage at any of the tube locations or the no.30 bus and the fact that bus engineeers claim that a security company came to repair the cctv in that same No-30 bus the day before the bombing (06/07), and the fact that the workers doing this took more longer than usual working on the job they were doing.

5). The mysterious re-routing of the No.30 bus, and witness statements that there were 2 separate explosions on the No-30 bus which varies from the official version of what happened, as reported by Miss Marie Oates-Whitehead, employee at the BMA and who was described as a herionne who assisted the injured after the explosion, and who died unexpectedly at her home 11 days later.

6). The mysterious witness statement of a man named Richard Jones who was on the bombed No.30 bus (who managed to give interviews to a range of tv, print and web media after the event shortly after the bus) who said he got off the bus shortly before it exploded and displayed various inconsistencies in his description of what he saw (ie: his description of the clothing and facial characteristics of the person he claimed had the backpack).